Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramavtar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan

Ramavtar Sharma vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 03, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/770795

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6026 of 2002
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 438--Anticipatory bail--Offence alleged under Sections 167, 218, 420, 423, 466, 467, 468 and 474, IPC--Bail already declined by Sessions Judge--Hence bail application--Held, since the person Sarpanch who issued the Patta to the main accused is already on bail, it is just and p...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramavtar Sharma

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
2003(2)WLN381

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 438--anticipatory bail--offence alleged under sections 167, 218, 420, 423, 466, 467, 468 and 474, ipc--bail already declined by sessions judge--hence bail application--held, since the person sarpanch who issued the patta to the main accused is already on bail, it is just and proper to enlarge the present accused on bail--bail granted.;bail application allowed - labour & servicesappointment: [shiv kumar sharma, ashok parihar & k.s. rathore, jj] merit list rajasthan secondary education act (42 of 1957), section 28 & rajasthan board of secondary education rules, rule 20 - held, improved marks obtained by candidate after re-appearing in examination can be considered for drawing the merit list of candidate for appointment to post of teacher. circular issued by the director of primary & secondary education ousting such candidate from consideration in merit list is illegal and without jurisdiction.a.c. goyal, j.1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned public prosecutor and perused the case diary. it was argued that govind ram who as sarpanch is said to have issued patta in question is on anticipatory bail by this court and the allegation against the present accused petitioner is that he got this patta. learned public prosecutor opposed it and contested that he is the main accused. i have considered the submission. keeping in view the fact that govind ram has been enlarged on bail by his court. it would not be proper to deny the bail to the present accused petitioner.2. taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under section 438, crpc.3. therefore, the sho of police station sanganer sadar is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner ramawtar sharma s/o madan lal in fir no. 206/2001 of aforesaid police station be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 20,000/- (rs. twenty thousand) with one sound surety of rs. 20,000/- to the satisfaction of concerned sho on the following conditions:1. that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required:2. that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and3. that the petitioner shall not leave india without previous permission of the court.

Full Judgment

A.C. Goyal, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the case diary. It was argued that Govind Ram who as Sarpanch is said to have issued Patta in question is on anticipatory bail by this Court and the allegation against the present accused petitioner is that he got this Patta. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed it and contested that he is the main accused. I have considered the submission. Keeping in view the fact that Govind Ram has been enlarged on bail by his Court. It would not be proper to deny the bail to the present accused petitioner.

2. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it is just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 438, CrpC.

3. Therefore, the SHO of Police Station Sanganer Sadar is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Ramawtar Sharma S/o Madan Lal in FIR No. 206/2001 of aforesaid police station be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. twenty thousand) with one sound surety of Rs. 20,000/- to the satisfaction of concerned SHO on the following conditions:

1. that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required:

2. that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer; and

3. that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial