Rajasthan Court August 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Wg. Com. H.K. Lal Vs. Dr. Satish Chand and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-1996
Reported in: 1996WLC(Raj)UC3; 1996(2)WLN87
Arun Madan, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties and also perused the Impugned order dated 8th May, 1996 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No. 4, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Suit No. 165/86. A very interesting question has arisen in this case for consideration of this Court relating to the amendment which has been allowed by the learned trial court in respect of a previously instituted suit on the grounds of default in payment of rent and bonafide and reasonable persona] necessity of the previous landlords/owners of the property in dispute who have been arrayed as respondents Nos. 1 and 2 in this revision petition. Respondents Nos. 3 and 4 are the subsequent purchasers for consideration of the said property from plaintiff-respondents Nos. 1 and 2. The petitioner-defendant was admittedly a tenant in the residential premises which was previously owned by the plaintiff-respondents No. 1 and 2. Earlier dispute had arisen between the petitioner and respondents Nos. 1 and...
Rajendra Prasad Yadav Vs. Prem Lata
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1996
Reported in: II(1997)DMC614; 1996(3)WLC505
R.S. Kejriwal, J.1. This revision has been directed against the order dated 7.9.1994, passed by learned District Judge, Alwar, whereby the said Court allowed the application submitted under Order 9, Rule 13 read with Section 151, C.P.C. filed by the respondent and set-aside the ex-parte decree of divorce dated 25.9.1986, passed in Civil Misc. Case No. 36/199/85.2. The brief relevant facts of the case are that the petitioner filed an application for divorce against the respondent. Notice of the said application was sent to the respondent by registered post. On the basis of an endorsement of refusal, the learned District Judge, Alwar, found that the service on the respondent was sufficient and proceeded ex-parte and an ex-parte decree was passed against the respondent on 25.9.1989. On 30.3.1988, the respondent filed an application under Order 9, Rule 13, C.P.C. for setting aside the ex-parte decree with the allegations that she never refused to accept the notice. She came to know only on...
Devi Das Vs. NaraIn Das
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)WLC529; 1996(2)WLN16
Arun Madan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 22.5.96 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge No. 4, Jaipur City, Jaipur whereby the appellate court upheld the order dated 22.5.96 of the trial court determining the provisional rent of the property in dispute at the rate of Rs. 1650/-per month and also the arrears of rent for the period from 1.1.93 to 30.4.96 amounting to Rs. 66,000/- pending the hearing and final disposal of the appeal. The appellate Court had also directed the appellant to deposit the aforesaid amount towards provisional rent as well as the arrears for the aforesaid period (i.e. for 40 months) and the interest of Rs. 5,909/- on the aforesaid amount in all amounting to Rs. 71,909/-. The appellant was further directed to deposit the said amount within 15 days of the said order in the Bank account of the respondent or pay in cash to him or deposit the same with the Court. He was also directed to deposit the further rent at the same rate by 15...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›