Rajasthan Court February 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shanti Devi Vs. Mathura Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-07-1995
Reported in: I(1995)DMC486
Rajendra Saxena, J.1. Heard, Perused the record of the lower Courts.2. This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 4.12.93 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tonk in Criminal Revision Petition No. 11/93, whereby, while rejecting the husband non-petitioner's revision petition against the order dated 3.11.91 of the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Tonk, whereby under Section 125, Cr.P.C., he granted maintenance to the petitioner at the rate of Rs. 400/- per month w.e.f. 9.1.89, was affirmed, but the lower Court's order was modified to the extent that the amount of maintenance granted in favour of the petitioner under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act shall be adjusted in the maintenance granted by him. It has been strenuonsly canvassed on behalf of the petitioner that the learned Additional Sessions Judge while exercising the power of revision was only empowered to look into the legality, correctness and propriety of the learned Magistrate's orde...
Pukhraj Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-07-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)WLC734; 1995(1)WLN238
N.K. Jain, J.1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to quah the order (verbal) passed by the respondent No. 3 by which the nomination paper of the petitioner was rejected.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner is the member of Jodhpur Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Jodhpur (respondent No. 2), As the term of the Board of Directors has already expired, by notification dated 10.11.94 (Annex. 1) published in daily newspaper 'Rajasthan Patrika'. election of Board of Directors was declared. Pursuant to the election programe. the petitioner filed his nomination paper. After scrutiny, on 18.11.94, the nomination paper of the petitioner was rejected on the ground that in his account Rs. 500/- was not maintained for two years. This writ petition is directed against the rejection of the nomination paper.3. This writ petition has been filed on 21.11.94. While issuing notice on 25.11.94, this Court ordered that in the meanti...
Nirmal Nahar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-07-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)WLC353; 1995(1)WLN265
N.K. Jain, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to be issued to the respondents to allow the members referred to in Anx. 1 to participate in the election scheduled to be held on 26.11.1994 and any action prejudicial to them may also sought to be quashed. It has been prayed that the respondents may also be directed not to allow those persons whose names have been mentioned in Anx. 4 and the same may be declared illegal and void.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case as alleged by the petitioner are that he along with 475 members applied for the membership of respondent No. 2 Jodhpur Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Jodhpur (hereinafter referred called as Bank). It is alleged that they completed all necessary formalities for becoming the members and deposited the requisite fees and share money according to rules, so membership of the petitioner and 475 persons mentioned in Anx. 1 was unanimously accepted in the meeting held on 5.2.1994. It is also alleged that election...
Devi Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-07-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)WLC144; 1995(1)WLN271
N.K. Jain, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to quash the order passed by the respondent No. 3 Election Officer rejecting the nomination paper of the petitioner. It has been prayed that the petitioner's nomination paper may be declared as legal one and valid.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case as alleged by the petitioner are that he is the member of the respondent No. 2 Jodhpur Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) and also remained the Director of the respondent Bank. It is alleged that he filed two nomination paper for the post of member of Board of Directors on 17.11.1994 and 18.11.1994 in pursuance of the election programme issued by Notification dt. 10.11.1994 published in Rajasthan Patrika dt. 11.10.1994 (Anx.1). It is also alleged that his nomination paper was rejected in the scrutiny and the order of rejection was also not supplied. On enquiry he was informed that since he stands as a guarantor for M/s. S.V. Construction an...
Kailash Talkies Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-06-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Raj30; 1996(1)WLC231
ORDERR.R. Yadav, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the impugned assessment orders dated 7-9-89 Annx. 1 to 5 for the month of April, 1988 toAugust, 1988 along with order dated 1-8-1992 Annexure 8 to the writ petition passed by the Addl. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Rajasthan, Jaipur (respondent No. 1) in exercise of his revisional powers under Rule 29 of the Rules framed under Rajasthan Entertainment (And Advertisements) Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rajasthan Act No. 24 of 1957).2. Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of the instant writ petition lies in a narrow compass. The Commercial Taxes Officer, Shri Samrath Lal Panwar made inspection on 30-8-1988 at 7.45p.m. of the petitioner's Picture Hall known as Kailash Talkies, Kapasan Dist. Chittorgarh in the presence of Shri Jagdish Prasad Borgama, brother of one of the partners and found that at that time, the picture 'Parwana' was exhibited. The Inspecting Officer al...
Suresh Kumar Rawat Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-06-1995
Reported in: (1998)146CTR(Raj)399; [1995]216ITR137(Raj)
1. Mr. R.K. Yadav for Mr. N.M. Ranka submits that Mr. Ranka has no instructions from the assessee. None appeared for the assessee. In an application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal was directed to refer the following questions for the opinion of this court :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was right in holding that the business in the name and style of Rawat Electricals at Ramganjmandi belonged to Sri Gulzarilal Rawat and not to Shri Suresh Kumar Rawat ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was right in holding that the amount of Rs. 8,000 was not an investment made by Sri Suresh Kumar Rawat in the concern of Rawat Electricals at Ramganjmandi and was made by his father, Gulzarilal ?' 2. In pursuance of our direction, the Tribunal has referred the abovesaid questions with a statement of case along with the annexures.3. The Assessing Officer in the year 1974-7...
Modern Woollens Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-06-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)WLC607; 1995(1)WLN233
R.R. Yadav, J.1. The petitioner compnay has filed the instant writ petition for quashing the impugned order dated 24 9 91 which was communicated to the petitioner company on 5.10.91 Anx. 2 to the writ petition passed by respondent No. 2 District Level Screening Committee, Bhilwara refusing grant of eligibility certificate under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Deferment Scheme for Industries, 1987 framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-Section on (2B) of Section 7 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (in short 'the Sales Tax Deferment Scheme, 1987').2. The factual matrix of the case for disposal of the instant writ petition are that the petitioner company of the Modem Worsted Sinners was constructed on the land situated in khasra Nos 3411, 3412 and 3413 The State Govt. also accorded the sanction for change of this land from Ware Housing Godown to Industrial purposes and orders have been passed for the change In the proposed draft master plan The relevant documents in support of the a...
Central Ware-housing Corporation, Sriganganagar Vs. State of Rajasthan ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-03-1995
Reported in: AIR1995Raj180
ORDERR.R. Yadav, J.1. The petitioner-Corporation calls in question assessment and imposition of tax amounting to Rs. 22,248/- by the Assistant Collector, Land and Building Tax Department, Sri Ganganagar under Section 6 Of the Rajasthan Lands & Buildings Tax Act, 1964 in respect of the land and Building situated in District Sri Ganganagar.2. The factual matrix of the present writpetition lies in short compass. It is alleged inthe writ petition by the petitioner thatAssistant Collector, Land and Building TaxDepartment, Sri Ganganagar (respondentNo. 2) issued a notice under the provision ofthe Rajasthan lands and Buildings Tax Act,1964 (Hereinafter referred to as 'the Act ofl1964) to the properties of the petitionersituated in Sri Ganganagar. The petitioner-Corporation did not file any return butappeared before respondent No. 2 in responseto the notice issued by him and urged beforehim that the land or building of the petitioner-Corporation cannot be assessed under the Actof 1964. Respond...
Prabhu Dayal Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-03-1995
Reported in: 1995CriLJ2565; 1996(3)WLC729
B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 31-3-87, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Sri Ganganagar, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the accused-appellant for the offence under Sections 302 and 380, I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo six month's rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 302, I.P.C.; and five years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo six months' rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 380, I.P.C.2. Appellant Prabhu Dayal, who was the husband of deceased Smt. Bhajno, was tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar, for committing the house lurking trespass in night and committing the murder of Smt. Bhajno in her house by inflicting grievous injuries. He was, also tried for committing the theft of the gol...
Tej Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-03-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT(Cri)3; 1995CriLJ1944
B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21-9-1989, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bali, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted accused-appellant Tej Singh for the offences under Sections 302 and 324, I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo three months' rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 302, I.P.C. and six months' rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 324, I.P.C. and directed that both the substantive sentences shall run concurrently. He, also, convicted accused Kesar Singh for the offence under Section 302/34, I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo three months' rigorous imprisonment.2. Appellants Tej Singh and Kesar Singh were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bali, for the offences under Section...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »