Rajasthan Court March 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajasthan Council of Diploma Engineers Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-16-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN506
ORDERP.C. Jain, J.1. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is about transfer of Government servants, particularly Class III and IV, which are being effected indiscriminately unjustly and frequently without any definite policy or guide-lines, which has resulted in demoralising the employees and harassment to them.2. The petitioner is a Union registered under the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926. It is a trade union of all the diploma-holder-Engineers belonging to the PWD, PHED and Irrigation Department. The Union has filed this writ petition on behalf of its members and other State employees in public interest. The contention of the petitioner Union in this writ petition is that though the service conditions of the members of the petitioner Union are governed by the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India, and also by the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1958 and also there are other rules deali...
Shashi Kant Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-16-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN429
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The question raised, point agitated and the relief sought against in this writ petition is the negation of the (quality to the persons similarly situated, by fixing a specific date September 2, 1972 in the definition of the term 'deceased Government Servant' in Rule 2(e) of the Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying While in Service Rules, 1975(here in after to be referred as 'the Rules') through a Notification viz., Department of Personnel (A-II) Notification No. F.3(6) Karmik/Ka-II/75, dated September 29, 19,5 by which the benefit of recruitment to the members of the family of the deceased under the Rules was limited only to the members of the family of the Government servant dying on or after September 2, 1972.2. The brief facts of the case as disclosed in the writ petition and the reply filed thereto, are that petitioner Shashikant's father Manoharlal, a constable in Police Department, posted at Pali, while going in a Jeep of the Poli...
Smt. Kamlesh Vs. Prem Prakash
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-16-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN698
N.C. Kochar, J.1. Smt. Kamlesh, the appellant, has filed this appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (here in after referred to as 'the Act') against the judgment and decree dated 21-7-1982) passed by the learned District Judge, Sri Ganganagar allowing the petition filed by Shri Prem Prakash (the respondent) and dissolving the marriage between the parties on the ground of curelty.2. The cases set up by she respondent in his petition filed by him on 11-5-1972 was as under:3. The marriage between the parties was performed according to Hindu rites about 6-1/2 years prior to the presentation of the petition and three sons, who were then aged about 6-1/2 years, 3-1/2 year and 11 months, were borne of the wedlock. The appellant had been short tempered and was of quarrel some nature and from the very beginning wanted the respondent to leave his parents and to start living in Gorakhpur but on appellant's not agreeing to the same she left to matrimonial home twice and went to l...
Jawahar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-15-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)103
M.B. Sharma, J.1. The second bail application was only dismissed by this Court on March 2, 1989. The first bail application was dismissed as far back as on March 14, 1988. Thus, the second bail application was filed after almost a year of the dismissal of the first bail application.2. The third bail application has been filed on the ground that the prosecution evidence has not concluded. Earlier an application under Section 319, Cr.P.C. was filed on the basis of the statement recorded in the trial court to take cognizance of offences mainly against four accused persons against whom the Police earlier had not filed charge-sheet and charge-sheet was filed only against two accused persons including the petitioner. It was given out that investigation in respect of other four accused persons is going on.3. While dismissing the second bail application under order dated March 2, 1989, it was brought to my notice that the application under Section 319, Cr.P.C. was dismissed on January 4, 1989....
Mohanram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-15-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)169
A.K. Mathur, J.1. Heard learned Counsels. The accused has been convicted Under Section 9 of the Opium Act and sentenced to 1 year R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo 3 month's, R.I.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenging the conviction and only prays that sentence should be reduced as the accused is 60 years of age, therefore, sentence may be reduced. Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case that incidence is of the year 1981 and accused is 60 years of age, therefore, I am inclined to reduce the sentence of the. accused petitioner from 1 year R.I. with a fine of Rs. 500/- to 6 month's R.I. without fine.3. In the result I allow the revision petition in part, conviction of the accused petitioner is maintained Under Section 9 of the Opium Act. How ever, his sentence is reduced from 1 year R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- to 6 month's R.I. without any fine....
Hemnath Vs. Jalam Singh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-15-1989
Reported in: 1(1990)WLN(Rev)590
N.C. Sharma, J.1. This second appeal was filed in this court on October 4, 1976 by Premnath and Durganath against the decree of the Addl. District Judge No. 2 Jodhpur dated March 23, 1976 affirming the decree of Civil Judge Jodhpur dated March 27, 1974 where by plaintiff's suit was dismissed.2. Facts leading to the filing of the second appeal are that on June 1, 1967 Mst. Poorannath institute Civil Suit No. 232 of 1967 in the Court of Munsif, Jodhpur against Jalam Singh respondent for cancellation of a relinquishment deed dated March 24, 1957 which was registered on March 27, 1967. It was alleged by Mst. Poorannath that there was a plot of land measuring 2250 square yards situated outside Sojati Gate on Kachhari Road, Jodhpur which had been purchased by her father Rawatji on Miti Baisakh Badi 8 Samvat 1948 and of which Rawatji obtained a patta on Miti Kartik Badi 12 Samvat 1957 After the death of Rawatji, the plaintiff and her mother Mst, Hastu became owner of this property as Rawatji ...
Hemnath by His L.Rs. and ors. Vs. Jalam Singh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-15-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN418
Navin Chandra Sharma, J.1. This second appeal was filed in this Court on October 4, 1976 by Premnath and Durganath against the decree of the Additional District Judge No. 2 Jodhpur dated March 23, 1976 affirming the decree of Civil Judge, Jodhpur dated March 27, 1974 where by plaintiff's suit was dismissed.2. Facts leading to the filing of the second appeal are that on June 1, 1967 Mst. Poorannath instituted Civil Suit No. 232 of 1967 in the Court of Munsif, Jodhpur against Jalam Singh respondent for concellation of a relinquishment deed dated March 24, 1967 which was registered on March 27, 1967. It was alleged by Mst. Poorannath that there was a plot of land measuring 22S0 square yards situated outside Sojati Gate on Kuchhari Road, Jodhpur which had been purchased by her father Rawatji on Miti Basiakh Budi 8 Samvat Year 1948 and of which Rawatji obtained a patta on Mitti Kartik Budi 12 Samvat Year 1957. After the death of Rawatji, the plaintiff and her mother Mst. Hastu became owner ...
Dharam Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-14-1989
Reported in: AIR1990Raj59; 1989(2)WLN381
ORDER1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks to quash the notice issued for the meeting for the Panchayat Samiti, Deogarh to be held on 18-3-89 for consideration of 'No Confidence Motion' against the petitioner and the petitioner has also sought relief for declaring Section 39(11) of the Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis and Zilla Parishads Act, 1959 (for short 'the Act') is ultra vires the provision of the principles of democracy as enshrined in the Constitution of India.2. We may state a few facts relevant for the disposal of this writ petition.3. The petitioner is a Pradhan of Deogarh Panchayat Samiti elected on 5-7-88. A notice of intention to make motion of no confidence against the petitioner was submitted to the Collector having jurisdiction over the Panchayat Samiti along with a copy of the proposed motion. The Collector, in turn, issued notice to the members of the Panchayat Samiti along with a copy of the proposed motion. The notice was to the effect that the motion shall be...
Ram Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-14-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)60
V.S. Dave, J.1. This petition has been filed under Section 382, Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 4, Jaipur City, Jaipur in case No. 436/87 for offence under Section 498A, IPC. Between the complainant and the accused persons there had been several litigations which included proceedings under Section 13, Hindu Marriage Act, case under Section 406, IPC, proceedings under Section 125, Cr.P.C. and application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and the present case under Section 498A. Four of these proceedings were before the family Court while this one was a report to the Police in pursuance of which a charge-sheet was filed by the police in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 4. Jaipur City, Jaipur, with the persuasion and intervention of social activity in the Court, all the matters pending before the Family Court were compromised and the proceedings have been terminated in terms of the mutual settle...
Smt. Maina Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-14-1989
Reported in: 1989WLN(UC)237
P.C. Jain, J.1. This petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed by Smt. Maina with the prayer that the property which has been ordered to be confiscated to State by the order passed while disposing the D.B. Cr. Appeal No. 353/84 decided on 9-9-1986, be recalled and the articles seized by the Police may be ordered to be given to the petitioner.2. The Police submitted a challan against Kailash Chand and others and the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Ajmer in Sessions Case No. 40/84 found both the accused-persons guilty of the offence under Section 302 and 302/34, IPC and sentenced them. An appeal was preferred by the accused persons which was registered as DB Cr. Appeal No. 353/84. This appeal has been decided by this Court on 9th September, 1986 and while accepting the appeal and acquitting the accused appellant this Court ordered that the ornaments seized in this case by the Police are confiscated to the State. The present petition has been moved under Section 482, Cr....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »