Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohanram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Mohanram vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 15, 1989
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/763334

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 277 of 1989
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Opium Act - Section 9--Sentence--Accused 60 years old--Incident of 1981--Held, sentence is reduced from 1 year to 6 months without fine.;Incidence is of the year 1981 and accused is 60 years of age, therefore, I am inclined to reduce the sentence of the accused-petitioner from 1 year R.I. with a fine of Rs. 500/- to...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohanram

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1989WLN(UC)169

Excerpt

opium act - section 9--sentence--accused 60 years old--incident of 1981--held, sentence is reduced from 1 year to 6 months without fine.;incidence is of the year 1981 and accused is 60 years of age, therefore, i am inclined to reduce the sentence of the accused-petitioner from 1 year r.i. with a fine of rs. 500/- to 6 months r.i. without fine.;revision partly allowed - a.k. mathur, j.1. heard learned counsels. the accused has been convicted under section 9 of the opium act and sentenced to 1 year r.i. and to pay a fine of rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo 3 month's, r.i.2. learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenging the conviction and only prays that sentence should be reduced as the accused is 60 years of age, therefore, sentence may be reduced. looking to the facts and circumstances of this case that incidence is of the year 1981 and accused is 60 years of age, therefore, i am inclined to reduce the sentence of the. accused petitioner from 1 year r.i. with a fine of rs. 500/- to 6 month's r.i. without fine.3. in the result i allow the revision petition in part, conviction of the accused petitioner is maintained under section 9 of the opium act. how ever, his sentence is reduced from 1 year r.i. and a fine of rs. 500/- to 6 month's r.i. without any fine.

Full Judgment

A.K. Mathur, J.

1. Heard learned Counsels. The accused has been convicted Under Section 9 of the Opium Act and sentenced to 1 year R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo 3 month's, R.I.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenging the conviction and only prays that sentence should be reduced as the accused is 60 years of age, therefore, sentence may be reduced. Looking to the facts and circumstances of this case that incidence is of the year 1981 and accused is 60 years of age, therefore, I am inclined to reduce the sentence of the. accused petitioner from 1 year R.I. with a fine of Rs. 500/- to 6 month's R.I. without fine.

3. In the result I allow the revision petition in part, conviction of the accused petitioner is maintained Under Section 9 of the Opium Act. How ever, his sentence is reduced from 1 year R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- to 6 month's R.I. without any fine.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial