Rajasthan Court July 1981 Judgments
Nathi Vs. Patori and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-06-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN250
K.D. Sharma, C.J.1. This is an application in revision against an order of the Sessions Judge, Bharatpur, dated June 20, 1977 by which the order passed by the Executive Magistrate, Bayana, dated April 11, 1977, ordering attachment of the agricultural land was set aside.2. The short facts giving rise to this revision application may be briefly narrated as follows. Proceedings under Section 145, Cr. P.C. were initiated against Patori non-applicant by the Executive Magistrate, Bayana, on an application made by Nathi, applicant in respect of agricultural lands situated in village Barah Mashi Tehsil Roopwas measuring 5 Bighas and 3 Biswas. The Executive Magistrate, however, did not draw any preliminary order but called upon the non-applicant Patori to appear in his court on April 5, 1977, as is evident from the certified copy of his order dated March 28, 1977, which reads as follows .--(HINDI)Patori, non-applicant put in his appearance in response to the notice issued to him and contested t...
Tag this Judgment!Govind Kaur Vs. Hardeo
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-06-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN323
S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. This appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short 'the Act') is directed against the order dated December 9, 1980 of a learned single Judge of this Court by which he held the appellant guilty for contempt of court and sentenced her to one month's simple imprisonment and further to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and costs of the application.2. The appellant and respondent will hereinafter be referred as non-applicant and applicant respectively. The applicant instituted a suit for ejectment against the, non-applicant, in regard to shop No. 6 and certain other premises situate on Station Road Jodhpur. The suit was decreed by the Munsif city, Jodhpur on February 5, 1972. An appeal was preferred. The appellant's suit in respect of shop No. 5 was dismissed and for other premises, the decree was maintained on August 28, 1973 by the learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Jodhpur. A second appeal was lodged by the non applicant. In the second appeal ...
Tag this Judgment!Jarnail Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-03-1981
Reported in: 1982CriLJ319; 1981()WLN220
ORDERG.M. Lodha, J.1. Accused Jarnail Singh and Bachan Singh claimed to be political workers of the Communist Party of India (Marxist). According to them they have been raising their voice against illegal and arbitrary excess of police authorities and, therefore, they have incurred annoyance of the Police Officers. The case of the accused is that false cases are concocted by the police and they have not been found guilty so far in any of the cases.2. The present one is a case where accused have been convicted Under Section 189. IPC The prosecution case which has been proved against them is that, on 13-12-1971 at about 10.15 A. M. when Shri Prakash Sardana, Police, Officer, was discharging his duties at the Police Station, Govindgarh in District Alwar, these accused along with a few others came in the Police Station. Jarnail Singh then asked the Police Officers why they have arrested their party workers Satyapal, Kishanchand and Hansa. Saying, so, they demanded their release and threate...
Tag this Judgment!Ramdhan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-03-1981
Reported in: 1981WLN520
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. Triple rape of a 'deaf & dumb' yet demand for anticipatory bail is the pivot of this order.2. A 'dumb and deaf', God cursed woman of 35 to 40 years of age, wife of a poor 'Rikshawala. is the victim of rape by three persons at 10 P.M. in the Ram Nivas Bagh of Jaipur. The accused claims to be a student and young boy of 19 years of age. The prayer is for extra ordinary indulgence of bail before jail'.3. The proecution case is that in the night of 9th May, 1981, Laxmi, a 'deaf and dumb', woman wife of Arjun was coming back to her house after attending a marriage at Brahampuri at about 11.00 p.m. in the right. Ram Dhan Meena and one Sardar and one more person forcibly compelled her to get down from the Rickshaw and after taking her in some dark place, all the three accused forcibly committed sexual intercourse with her. The prosecutrix narrated the story to the husband in the night at about 1.00, when he came in the house. Arjun went to the police station along with La...
Tag this Judgment!Mahesh Transport Co. Vs. R.T.A. Jodhpur
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-02-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Raj80
ORDERM.C. Jain, J. 1. The petitioner in this writpetition has sought a prayer restrainingthe Regional Transport Authority, Jodhpur, from considering the belated applications received in pursuance of thenotification published in the RajasthanRajpatra dt. 13-3-1980 along with thepetitioner's application and other applications which had been received in pursuance of the Gazette Notification dt.20-12-1979. 2. The facts of the present case lie in a very narrow compass. The Regional Transport Authority, Jodhpur, after fixing the scope of four stage carriages to perform two return services over the route Gachipura to Ajmer had invited applications for grant of four non-temporary stage carriage permits. The applications were invited through a Gazette Notification dt. 20-12-1979 (Annexure P/1), in which it was notified that the interested persons must file the application within a period of 30 days from the date of the publication. In pursuance of the Notification Annexure P/l the petitioner an...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›