Rajasthan Court August 1977 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jeetsingh Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-22-1977
Reported in: 1978WLN(UC)94
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. On January 31, 1974 at 10 a.m Food Inspector PW 1 Hanuman Modi stopped a bus. On checking the accused petitioner was found carrying milk for sale. 660 millilitre of milk was purchased from the accused petitioner by the Food Inspector, after complying with the forma ities provided under the Act The milk was divided in three equal parts. Each of them was filled in three clean dry bottles and they were sealed in preseace of the accused-petitioner. One bottle was kept by the Food Inspector, the other was given t the accused and the third one was sent for analysis to the Public Analyst at Jaipur, who found the milk to be adulterated. The Food Inspector after obtaining sanction filed a complaint in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alwar The learned Magistrate placing reliance on the statement of the Food Inspector corroborated by the PW. 2 Harnarain, PW. 3 Pooranchand and taking into consideration the report of the Public Analyst found the accused petitioner gui...
Asu Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-19-1977
Reported in: 1977WLN419
K.D. Sharma, J.1. This is an application under Section 482, Cr. P.C. for quashing an order of the Munsiff - Magistrate, Barmer, dated 7th July, 1975, by which cognizance of offence punishable under Sections 500 and 505, I.P.C. was taken against the applicants on a police challan filed by the SHO Police Station, Banner, on March 31, 1975.2. The relevant facts giving rise to his application Under Section 482, Cr. P.C. may be stated as follows: One Pirchand filed a complaint against the applicants in the court of Munsiff Magistrate, Barmer, under Sections 500 & 505, I.P.C. on 13th March, 1975. The Munsiff-Magistrate did not take cognizance of the aforesaid offences on the complaint filed by Pir Chand. The complaint, however was forwarded to the Station House Officer. Barmer, for investigation under Section 156(3), Cr. P.C. The Station House Officer, Barmer, registered a criminal case against the applicants under Sections 500 and 505, I.P.C. on the basis of the facts contained in the compl...
Niranjan Kripal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-18-1977
Reported in: 1977WLN(UC)241
D.P. Gupta, J.1. In this writ petition two questions have been raised by the petitioner : viz. firstly, it has been prayed that the promotions of the respondents Nos. 4 to 23 to the posts of Office Assistants in the Rajasthan Canal! Project and the reversion of the petitioner from the aforesaid post be quashed In the second place it has been urged that the inter laced seniority list issued by the Chief Engineer of the Irrigation Department of the State of Rajasthan vide his office order dated December 18, 1971 be quashed.2. In view of the order, I propose to make in this writ petition, it is-not necessary to give detailed facts which led the petitioner to file this petition. It would be sufficient to save that the petitioner as well as the respondents are substantive Upper Division Clerks working in the Irrigation Department of the State of Rajasthan, the Rajasthan Canal Project and the Rana Partapsagar and jawahar Sagar Dams Project. Organisations. The petitioner was promoted as an of...
Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-18-1977
Reported in: 1977WLN414
D.P. Gupta, J.1. I have already expressed the view, in my order dated August 12, 1977 that the Governor of a State does not hold an employment under the Government of India or under the Government of a State within the meaning of Article 319 of the Constitution of India, and I now proceed to give my reasons for the aforesaid decision.2. The Rajasthan State Legislature passed an enactment called 'The Rajasthan Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1977', substituting Section 23 A in the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959. The aforesaid Act was published in the Rajasthan Gazette dated August 5, 1977 after it received the assent of the Governor of Rajasthan Shri Raghukul Tilak under Article 200 of the Constitution. As a result of the provisions of the amended Section 23-A, the term of all Municipal Boards, elections to which took place during the period of emergency, stood expired on the date of the commencement of the Rajasthan Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1977. The petitioner, who was the ...
Ugam Chand Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-17-1977
Reported in: 1977WLN(UC)314
D.P. Gupta, J.1. The petitioner has submitted an application for amendment of the writ petition under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The application is allowed.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner and respondent No. 4 were heard on the basis of the allegations made in the writ petition as amended.3. The case of the petitioner is that he was shown as senior to the respondent No. 4 in earlier seniority list of clerks working; in the Personnel Branch of the Northern Railway which was issued on May 18, 1970 and on the basis of which the petitioner was promoted in an officiating capacity as A.W.L.I. by the order of the Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway, Jodhpur dated 5/13-12-1973 and thereafter by the order dated December 31, 1975 he was transferred from that post to the post of API in an officiating capacity. Subsequently by the order of the Divisional Personnel Officer dated June 8, 1977 the petitioner was reverted from the post of officiating API to his s...
Hari Shanker Goyal Vs. University of Rajasthan, Jaipur and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-12-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Raj58; 1977()WLN593
ORDERA.P. Sen, J.1. This writ petition by Shri Hari Shanker Goyal, an advocate practising in this Court, and a registered graduate of the Rajasthan University, seeks the issuance of a writ of quo warranto against the respondent No. 2, Shri Ziauddin Khan, Professor and Head of the Department of Public Administration, Rajasthan University and against the respondents Nos. 3 and 4, namely, Sarvashri Girdhar Behari Sharma and Hosiar Singh, Lecturers, Department of Public Administration, Rajasthan University, from usurping the offices of Professor of Public Administration and Lecturers, Department of Public Administration, Rajasthan University, respectively.2. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent No. 2, Shri Ziauddin Khan, retired as Professor and Head of the Department of Public Administration, Rajasthan University, in the year 1974. That being so, the relief claimed against him in the petition has become infructuous.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has, however...
Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd. Vs. B.B. Harsha and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-12-1977
Reported in: 1977WLN461
A.P. Sen, J.1. This writ petition by M/s. Raptakos, Brett Co. Ltd. Jaipur, is directed against the award of the Authority, appointed under the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1958, dated December 31, 1976, setting aside the order of the petitioner dated April 8, 1976, terminating the services of the respondent No. 2, Jaswant Jayram, and discharging him from its employment.2. The petitioner M/s Raptakos, Brett & Co., Ltd., Jaipur, which is a commercial establishment, terminated with immediate effect the services of respondent No. 2 Jaswant Jayram, who was employed as Office-bearer-cum-peon, by its letter dated April 8, 1976, which reads - Mr. Jaswant Jairam, 8th April 1976JAIPUR BRANCHDear Sir;You are hereby informed that your services are no longer required by us.We are enclosing a cheque for Rs. 794/- being one month's wages in lieu of notice. You are relieved of the duties with immediate effectYour other dues will be settled in due course.Yours faithfully,Raptakos,...
Govind Ram Vs. Smt. Raji Bai and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-10-1977
Reported in: AIR1979Raj55; 1977()WLN372
ORDERD.P. Gupta, J.1. This is a revision application against the order passed by theCivil Judge, Chittorgarh, dated March 8, 1977 in a suit for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent The rent for the month of Jeth Samwat 2033 was due and payable on June 13, 1976 and the same should have been paid to the plaintiff-landlords or deposited in court, within 15 days of the aforesaid date, under Section 13 (4) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The rent for the month of Asad Samwat 2033 fell due on July 12, 1976 and was similarly payable within 15 days thereof.2. On July 17, 1976 the plaintiffs filed an application in the trial court praying that the defence of the defendant may be struck off under Sub-section (6) of Section 13 of the Act, as the rent for the months of Jeth and Asad Samwat 2033 had not been paid by him within the time allowed by law. On July 24, 1976 the defendant-applicant deposited two months' rent a...
Jagdish Prasad Vs. Kapoor Chand and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-09-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Raj61; 1977WLN(UC)307
ORDERA.P. Sen, J.1. This is a defendant's revision under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act') directed against the judgment and decree of Additional Civil Judge No. 2, Bharatpur, Camp Gangapur, dated Oct. 3, 1970, reversing the judgment and decree of the Munsif, Hindaun, dated May 18, 1966. and decreeing the plaintiff's suit under Section 6 of the Act, whereby the learned Additional Civil Judge has decreed the plaintiff's claim reducing the rent of two shops in Hindaitn from Rs. 80/- per mensem to Rs. 20/- per mensem.2. This litigation has had a chequered career. The parties are closely related and also stand in the relation of landlord and tenant. The demised premises comprise of two shops in the heart of business locality of Hindaun. Joharilal's daughter was married to Ram Sahai, father of Kapoor Chand. while Jagdish Prasad who is another daughter's son of Johari Lal, was taken in adoption by him. K...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Teka Alias Tekchand and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-08-1977
Reported in: 1977WLN473
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. The accused-appellant Teka alias Tek Chand has been convicted and sentenced to death by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Alwar by his judgment dated January 28, 1977. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has made this reference for confirmation of the sentence of death and, accused-appellant Teka alias Tek Chand has filed an appeal from Jail against his conviction and sentence. As both these cases arise out of the same judgment, they are being disposed of by common, judgment2. Tersely speaking shorn of unnecessary details the prosecution story as disclosed at the trial is that Umar Khan (since deceased) and accused Jai Dayal (acquitted by the trial Court) were at daggers down Jai Dayal wanted Umar Khan to be removed from the surface of earth and as such he approached Bholaram PW 2 (Approver) to suggest some way out. There after Jai Dayal, Teka and Bholaram hatched a criminal conspiracy to commit the murder of Umar Khan. On the next day all the three met ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »