Rajasthan Jodhpur Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arun Kumar Kashyap Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-30-2014
SBCWP No.3449/97 Arun Kumar Kashyap vs. State & Ors. Order dt:30/9/2014 1/21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER Arun Kumar Kashyap vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3449/97 DATE OF ORDER :30. h September, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. M.C.Bhoot, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the petitioner. Mr. Mukesh Dave, for the respondent Department. BY THE COURT:1. The petitioner Arun Kumar Kashyap had filed this writ petition in this Court on 23/8/1997 for the following reliefs claimed by him in the writ petition. (a) by an appropriate writ, order or direction Annexure No.16 dt. 11.10.96 be set aside/quashed. (b) That petitioner be given pension and other past retiral benefits as per his qualifying service till the date of retirement. (c ) any other apporpriate writ, order or direction which in the facts and circumstances of the case, may be deemed just and proper be issued in favour of the petitioner.. 2. Wh...
M/S Hanuman Tubewell Co Vs. Govt.of Rajasthan and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-30-2014
-1- SB Civil Arbitration Application No.91/2013 M/s Hanuman Tube Well Co.v.Government of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 30th September, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr.Vikas Balia ].Mr.V.D.Vaishnav].for the applicant. Mr.S.M.Toshniwal for the respondents...This application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1996') is vehemently contested by the respondents with assertion that arbitral proceeding in the instant matter has already been concluded and an award has already been passed by the standing committee appointed as per clause 23 of the agreement in question, therefore, no direction can be given as prayed for. The factual matrix, necessary to be noticed to examine merits of the issue involved, is that the applicant, a partnership firm, entered into an agreement with Executive Engineer, Narmada Canal Project, Division-IV, Sanchore for carrying out work meant for supplying, laying, jointing, testing and comm...
Ajit Vs. State of Raj
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-30-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. *** D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.5573/2014 AJIT V/S STATE & ORS.*** DATE OF ORDER0309.2014 HON'BLE Mr.GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS,J HON'BLE Mr.ATUL KUMAR JAIN ,J By post. Mr.Rakesh Mohan Sharma, Superintendent, Central Jail, Jodhpur Reportable The instant petition has been filed by convict prisoner Ajit S/o Shri Shiv Lal Meghwal who is serving the sentence at Central Jail, Bikaner for giving him benefit of section 427 Cr.PC in five criminal cases in which he had been convicted. It is an admitted position that in five cases he was convicted and sentenced by the different courts as follows:- (1)In criminal case No.274/2001 convicted by the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nohar on 9.5.2002 under section 3/25 1 B (a) of the Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced by two years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/- (with usual default clause).The prisoner served the actual sentence but the amount of fine remains outstanding ...
Bhagwan Dass Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-29-2014
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6606/2013. Bhagwas Dass Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 29/09/2014 1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER :: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6606/2013. Bhagwas Dass Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::::29. h September, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. V.K. Mathur, for the petitioner. None present for the respondents. -- BY THE COURT:1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, Mr. Bhagwas Dass S/o Sh. Panju Ram, in this Court on 22.05.2013 seeking following relief(s): - It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:1. The record of the case may kindly be called for.2. The order of suspension dated 2.4.2013 (Annx.5) may kindly be declared illegal S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6606/2013. Bhagwas Dass Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dated 29/09/2014 2/3 and the same may be quashed and...
Lrs of Ram Kumar Vs. Ram Kumar Murarka and Sons
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-29-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL FIRs.APPEAL NO.99/1985 LRs of Ramkumar versus Ram Kumar Murarka & Sons (Pvt.) LTD.Date of Judgment :: 29.09.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Sunil Ranwa, for the appellant/s. ----- BY THE COURT: This appeal under Section 96 CPC is directed against the judgment and final decree dated 19.8.1985 passed by the Additional District Judge, Bhilwara, whereby in a suit for rendition of accounts, the Court passed a decree for payment of a sum of Rs.15,944.99 P. alongwith interest @ 6% p.a.from the date of filing of the suit i.e.20.10.1964. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the plaintiff- respondent filed a suit for rendition of accounts against the appellant-defendant. A preliminary decree dated 21.4.1969 was passed for rendition of accounts for the period from 16.7.1962 to 13.8.1963, the preliminary decree was confirmed by this Court by its judgment dated 15.3.1979 passed in S.B.Civil Regular ...
Dharmaveer Godara and ors Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-29-2014
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1616/2014. Dharamveer Godara & ORS.versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dated 29/09/2014 1/3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER :: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.1616/2014. Dharamveer Godara & ORS.versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :::: 29th September, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.R.S.Saluja, for the petitioneRs.Mr.N.K.Mehta, Addl. Govt. Counsel. -- BY THE COURT: 1. The petitioneRs.who are diploma holder in Civil Engineering, their names were forwarded by the Man Power Department as Junior Engineer to the respondent Public Health & Engineering Department (PHED) and accordingly the petitioners were given appointment vide orders dated 10.12.1987 (Annex.2) and order dated 27.01.1997 (Annex.3) on ad hoc basis in the pay scale of Rs.1160-2360. The petitioners served the in ad hoc capacity for a couple of yeaRs.however, their services were later on regularized vide the order dated 31.12.2013...
Ramu Ram Siyag Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-29-2014
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.616/2014 Ramu Ram Siyag versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dt: 29/09/2014 1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.616/2014 Ramu Ram Siyag versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF ORDER ::: 29th September 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.C.S.Bissa, for the petitioner. Mr.N.K.Mehta, Addl. Govt. Counsel. -- BY THE COURT: 1. The petitioner has approached this Court assailing the inaction on the part of the respondents for wrong fixation in the selection grades to him. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition in this Court on 22.01.2014 seeking following relief(s).- It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction respondents be directed to :- (I)Respondents be directed to declare petitioner to be entitled for grant of Second selection scale of Rs.5000-8000 on completion of...
Ummed Singh Rajpurohit and ors Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-29-2014
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6719/2014. Ummed Singh Rajpurohit & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:29. 09/2014 1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6719/2014. Ummed Singh Rajpurohit & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::29. h September 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: None present for the petitioners. -- BY THE COURT:1. None is present on behalf of petitioner, though name of Mr. R.S. Choudhary, is shown in the cause list.2. Perused the record.3. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition in this Court on 22.09.2014 seeking following relief(s): - It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction: - (i)the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the past service of the petitioners S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6719/2014. Ummed Singh Rajpurohit & Ors. Vs. State of Rajas...
Sumitra Choudhary Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-29-2014
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6273/2014. Sumitra Choudhary versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dated 29/09/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: ORDER :: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.6273/2014. Sumitra Choudhary versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :::: 29th September, 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.Pramendra Bohra, for the petitioner. -- BY THE COURT: 1. The petitioner, working as 'Gram Sevak-cum- Secretary of the Gram Panchayat- Beri Tala, Panchayat Samiti Sindhari, District: Barmer, has filed the present writ petition aggrieved by the impugned charge-sheet served upon her vide (Annex.11) dated 30.08.2014 and the impugned order (Annex.10) dated 30.08.2014 placing her under suspension on account of initaition of enquiry against the petitioner. 2. Mr.Pramendra Bohra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner filed a complaint against the Sarpanch vide (Annex.6) (Page 33 of the paper book) ...
Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Sep-29-2014
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3293/2012 Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dtd. 29/09/2014 1/9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3293/2012 Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. .. Date of Order ::::29. h September, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, for the petitioner. Mr. Sajjan Singh on behalf of Dr. P.S. Bhati, AAG for the State. Mr. D.K. Parihar, for the respondent No.4. -- BY THE COURT:1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the decision of a coordinate bench of this Court in the case of Dr. P.D. Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.3767/2010, decided on 23.09.2011). The issue raised in the present writ petition is in relation to inclusion of period of service rendered by the incumbent/petitioner in the Government...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »