Rajasthan Jodhpur Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Raj. and anr Vs. Chhotu Ram
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
1 SAW No.121/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) No.121/2013 in S.B. Civil Misc. Contempt Petition No.534/2009 State of Rajasthan & Anr. vs. Chhotu Ram DATE :11. h March, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Dr. Ganpat Ram Kaler, CM&HO, Nagaur, present in person. Dr. Ganpat Ram Kaler, Chief Medical and Health Officer, Nagaur, is present in person on behalf of appellants. This Special Appeal is directed against order dated 19th February, 2013 passed by learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.534/2009. Registry has pointed out a defect that parties in Special Appeal have not been made as per impugned order of Single Bench. We have examined the order passed by learned Single Judge. It appears from the cause title of the contempt petition that a contempt petition was preferred by writ-petitioner Chhotu Ram against contemnor-respondents, Shri Basant Kumar, Additional...
Kapil Senani and anr Vs. State and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Mar-03-2013
1. S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 102/2009 (Kapil Senani & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) DATE OF ORDER :03. March, 2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr. Pradeep Shah, for the petitioners. Mrs. Chandralekha, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Bharat Singh, for the respondent No.2. The present misc. petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners challenging the order dated 20.12.2006 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Salumber in Criminal Regular Case No.826/2006 taking cognizance against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC on negative a final report. The said order has been affirmed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.3, Udaipur Camp Salumber by order dated 28.07.2008. Briefly stated the facts necessary for the disposal of this misc. petition are that the respondent No.2 filed a complaint against the petitioners in the court of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Salumber, which was forwarded under Se...
Om Prakash Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Mar-03-2013
1 S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1364/2011 (Omprakash Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) DATE OF ORDER :03. March, 2012 HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr. Pankaj Sharma, for the petitioner. Mrs. Chandralekha, Public Prosecutor. Dr. S.S. Jodha, for the respondents Nos.2 and 3. The present revision petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner (complainant) challenging the order dated 25.11.2011 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Merta in Sessions Case No.23/2008 arising out of FIR No.161/2007, registered at Police Station Degana at the instance of petitioner complainant. The grievance which has been raised is with regard to non framing of the charges for the offences under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC against the accused respondents Nos.2 and 3. Briefly stated the facts necessary for the disposal of this revision petition are that the petitioner complainant filed a complaint in the concerned court, which was sent to the police for inv...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›