Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State of Raj. and anr Vs. Chhotu Ram

State of Raj. and anr vs Chhotu Ram

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Mar 11, 2013
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973747

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Contempt of Court

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contempt of Court

Key legal issue
Contempt of Court

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Raj. and anr

Respondent

Chhotu Ram

Excerpt

.....this special appeal is directed against order dated 19th february, 2013 passed by learned single judge in s.b. civil contempt petition no.534/2009. registry has pointed out a defect that parties in special appeal have not been made as per impugned order of single bench. we have examined the order passed by learned single judge. it appears from the cause title of the contempt petition that a contempt petition was preferred by writ-petitioner chhotu ram against contemnor-respondents, shri basant kumar, additional director and shri akhilesh mathur, chief medical and health officer, nagaur. the order dated 19th february, 2013, impugned in this special appeal, is presumed 2 saw no.121/2013 to have been passed against contemnor-respondents, namely, shri basant kumar and shri akhilesh mathur. the present special appeal has not been filed by shri basant kumar and shri akhilesh mathur, but it has been filed by state of rajasthan and chief medical and health officer, nagaur, who were not parties independently by designation only, in the contempt petition. since both the contemnor-respondents have not preferred any appeal, therefore, present appeal on behalf of state of rajasthan and chief medical and health officer, is not maintainable. dr. ganpat ram kaler submitted that at present he is holding a post of chief medical and health officer, nagaur, but he was not impleaded as a party/respondent/contemnor in his name in the contempt petition. since, he is holding the post of cm&ho, therefore, as per directions of the state government, he has signed on the affidavit filed in support of stay application as an officer-incharge. dr. kaler further submitted that shri basant kumar, the then additional director, has already been transferred from the post of additional director. he has also submitted that shri akhilesh mathur, the then cm&ho has also been promoted on the post of additional director, but writ-petitioner, chhotu ram did not implead the present additional director and.....

Full Judgment

1 SAW No.121/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) No.121/2013 in S.B. Civil Misc. Contempt Petition No.534/2009 State of Rajasthan & Anr. vs. Chhotu Ram DATE :

11. h March, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Dr. Ganpat Ram Kaler, CM&HO, Nagaur, present in person. Dr. Ganpat Ram Kaler, Chief Medical and Health Officer, Nagaur, is present in person on behalf of appellants. This Special Appeal is directed against order dated 19th February, 2013 passed by learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.534/2009. Registry has pointed out a defect that parties in Special Appeal have not been made as per impugned order of Single Bench. We have examined the order passed by learned Single Judge. It appears from the cause title of the contempt petition that a contempt petition was preferred by writ-petitioner Chhotu Ram against contemnor-respondents, Shri Basant Kumar, Additional Director and Shri Akhilesh Mathur, Chief Medical and Health Officer, Nagaur. The order dated 19th February, 2013, impugned in this Special Appeal, is presumed 2 SAW No.121/2013 to have been passed against contemnor-respondents, namely, Shri Basant Kumar and Shri Akhilesh Mathur. The present Special Appeal has not been filed by Shri Basant Kumar and Shri Akhilesh Mathur, but it has been filed by State of Rajasthan and Chief Medical and Health Officer, Nagaur, who were not parties independently by designation only, in the contempt petition. Since both the contemnor-respondents have not preferred any appeal, therefore, present appeal on behalf of State of Rajasthan and Chief Medical and Health Officer, is not maintainable. Dr. Ganpat Ram Kaler submitted that at present he is holding a post of Chief Medical and Health Officer, Nagaur, but he was not impleaded as a party/respondent/contemnor in his name in the contempt petition. Since, he is holding the post of CM&HO, therefore, as per directions of the State Government, he has signed on the affidavit filed in support of stay application as an Officer-Incharge. Dr. Kaler further submitted that Shri Basant Kumar, the then Additional Director, has already been transferred from the post of Additional Director. He has also submitted that Shri Akhilesh Mathur, the then CM&HO has also been promoted on the post of Additional Director, but writ-petitioner, Chhotu Ram did not implead the present Additional Director and CM&HO as party / respondents/contemnors in the contempt petition, since they were not impleaded as parties, therefore, they could not have preferred this appeal. Since present intra-court appeal has not been preferred by any of the contemnors/respondents, impleaded in 3 SAW No.121/2013 contempt petition, therefore, present Special Appeal on behalf of present appellants, who were not parties in contempt petition, is not maintainable, as the impugned order is presumed to have been passed against contemnors, who were impleaded as parties in the contempt petition. Therefore, we find that the registry has rightly pointed out a defect, which cannot even be cured. In these circumstances, we dismiss the Special Appeal as well as Stay Application, both, as not maintainable. (ARUN BHANSALI),J.

(NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN),J.

Sanjay , Jrpa S.No.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial