Rajasthan Jodhpur Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalpatru Power Transmission Ltd Vs. State (Energy) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
SAW No.1246/2011 Kalpatru Power Transmission Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: JUDGMENT :: D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL [W] NO.1246/2011 Kalpatru Power Transmission Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order ::21. t August 2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.HON'BLE MR. NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-II, J.Mr.M.S. Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj Bhandari ] Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma ], for the appellant. Mr.Anand Purohit, Senior Advocate and AAG with Mr.Pradhyuman Singh, for the respondents Nos.1 and 2. Mr.V.K. Agarwal, for the respondents Nos. 3 and 4. BY THE COURT: This intra-court appeal arises out of a writ petition (CWP No.8781/2011) wherein the petitioner-appellant Kalpatru Power Transmission Ltd. stated grievance against the Notice Inviting Tender ('NIT') dated 19.08.2011 [Annex.8] as issued by the respondents Nos.3 and 4 for setting up of 4.9 MWH biomass based co-generation power plant; and prayed that t...
Devkaran Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
1 S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.4851/2012 Dev Karan v. State. DATE OF ORDER :21. 8.2012 HON'BLE MRs. NISHA GUPTA,J.Mr. A.R. Choudhary,for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Joshi , Public Prosecutor for the State. ... Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State. The contention of the present petitioner is that he has been involved falsely. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. He has not been identified in the test identification parade. Hence he should be released on bail. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Without going into the merit of the case, it is a fit case to release the present petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application of present petitioner is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Dev Karan s/o Gheesa Ram in connection with FIR No.14/2012 Jhanwar of Police Station District Jodhpur shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a 2 personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along w...
Rakesh Sabarwal Vs. Balmukund
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.109/2000 Smt. Archana Sabharwal vs. Bal Mukund & anr. S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.11/2000 Rakesh Sabharwal vs. Bal Mukund & ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:21. t August1. 18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.109/2000 (SMT. ARCHANA SABHARWAL VS. BAL MUKUND & ANR.) (2) S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.11/2000 (RAKESH SABHARWAL VS. BAL MUKUND & ORS.) DATE OF JUDGMENT :21. 08.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.R.K. Thanvi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Narendra Thanvi for defendant appellant Shri Rakesh Sabharwal. Mr.Prabhat Ojha, for defendant appellant Smt. Archana Sabharwal. Mr. Suresh Shrimali, for plaintiff respondent Mr. Bal Mukund. REPORTABLE :1. The present two first appeals have been filed by the defendants appellants against a compromise decree dated 25.08.1999 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Abu Road, district Sirohi in Civil Suit No.52/96 (34/95) Bal Mukund s/o Shri Chiranji L...
Smt. Archana Sabharwal Vs. Bal Mukund and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.109/2000 Smt. Archana Sabharwal vs. Bal Mukund & anr. S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.11/2000 Rakesh Sabharwal vs. Bal Mukund & ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:21. t August1. 18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT (1) S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.109/2000 (SMT. ARCHANA SABHARWAL VS. BAL MUKUND & ANR.) (2) S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.11/2000 (RAKESH SABHARWAL VS. BAL MUKUND & ORS.) DATE OF JUDGMENT :21. 08.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.R.K. Thanvi, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Narendra Thanvi for defendant appellant Shri Rakesh Sabharwal. Mr.Prabhat Ojha, for defendant appellant Smt. Archana Sabharwal. Mr. Suresh Shrimali, for plaintiff respondent Mr. Bal Mukund. REPORTABLE :1. The present two first appeals have been filed by the defendants appellants against a compromise decree dated 25.08.1999 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Abu Road, district Sirohi in Civil Suit No.52/96 (34/95) Bal Mukund s/o Shri Chiranji L...
Himmat Bharati Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 8953/2009 (Himmat Bharti Vs. State & Ors) Date of Order ::21. 08.2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. S.K.M. Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr. Vimal Mathur ] for the respondents. Mr. K.K. Bissa, for the Pension Department. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner who is retired employee of P.H.E.D department is challenging validity of the order dated 25.05.09 passed by Assistant Engineer, Public Health and Engineering Department, Construction Sub Division-III, Jodhpur and prayed that respondents may be directed to make payment of entire retiral dues after making proper fixation as per revised payscale rules, 2006 with interest @ 12% within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier a writ petition was preferred before this Court for making proper fixation which was registered as S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3458/90. The Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 07.07.99 issued certain directions t...
Smt. Sita Devi Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5898/2008 (Smt. Sita Devi Vs. State & Ors) Date of Order ::21. 08.2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Rajesh Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Choudhary, for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondents to pay entire retiral dues of her husband including amount of gratuity, privilege leave, G.P.F and benefits of revised pay-scale alongwith interest @ 18%. Admittedly, petitioner's husband was working in the office of respondent no.2 as Assistant Prcha Viterak cum Supervisor and died while in service on 22.07.05. Thereafter, repeatedly petitioner made prayer for finalisation of retiral benefits of her husband who was working on the post of Assistant Parcha Viterak cum Supervisor. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the writ petition, certain amount has been paid to the petitioner but still there is outstanding wi...
M/S. Shyam Oils Vs. M/S. Jugal Kishore Vanaspati Prod. P.Ltd
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4541/2012 (M/s Shyam Oils Vs. M/s Jugal Kishore Vanaspati Product Ltd) Date of Order ::21. 08.2012 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Dr. Ashok Soni, for the petitioner. Mr. G.D. Bansal, for respondent caveator. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 02.05.2012 whereby, the application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC filed in Civil Suit No. 410/10 was rejected and further it is prayed that Additional District Judge (FT) No.2 Metropolitan Jodhpur may be directed to defer/adjourn the suit till disposal of Special Leave to Appeal No. 9299/12 pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that trial court is proceeding in the matter due to directions issued by this Court in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2061/2011 decided on 19.12.2011 and against that order, petitioner has already preferred Special Leave to Appeal before Hon'ble Suprem...
Shyam Sundar Vs. Gauri Devi Trust
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
!! 1 !! IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : O R D E R: S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9209/2011 (Shyam Sundar Vs. Gouri Devi) Date of Order ::21. 08.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. P.R. Mehta, for the petitioner. ------ BY THE COURT : Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the impugned order dated 12.07.2011 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Divisioin), Degana, District Nagaur, by which, the trial court rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Order 11 Rule 12 read with section 151 CPC. After perusing the order impugned, I am not inclined to interfere with the order impugned. Hence, this writ petition is hereby dismissed. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J.AKC M/1...
Reliance G.i.C.Ltd Vs. Gokul Prasad and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
1 CMA Nos.1594/2012 & 1595/2012 18&72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT. (1) S. B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1594/2012. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri Gokul Prasad & Others. (2) S. B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1595/2012. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri Mangu Singh & Others. DATE OF JUDGMENT :::21. 08.2012 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR Mr.R.K.Singhal, for Appellant (s). BY THE COURT: Learned counsel for the appellant has moved 2 applications; one in S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1594/2012 and the other in S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1595/2012, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 3 days and ten days respectively. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, delay is condoned and applications are allowed. Both the above appeals shall stand disposed of by this common judgment as the impugned judgment is same. However, for convenience, the facts are being taken from S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1594/2012. Cl...
Sapana Yadav Vs. State (Rural Deve. and Pan. Raj.) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.7434/2012 Sapana Yadav Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. Date of Order :21. 08.2012 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Rajesh Shah for the petitioner BY THE COURT : The petitioner qualified Central Teachers Eligibility Test-2012 conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education, Delhi. She also faced the process of selection initiated by the Zila Parishad, Sirohi for the purpose of recruitment to the post of Teacher Grade-III in Upper Primary Schools. Her apprehension is that in view of the Government of Rajasthan's circular dated 31.05.2012, the respondents may not allow her to participate in the subsequent steps of the process of selection. A direction, therefore, is demanded against the respondents to permit the petitioner to face complete process of selection initiated under the advertisement dated 24.02.2012. Quite frankly it is accepted by the learned counsel for the petit...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »