Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. Sami Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3209 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3209 of 2012 ====================================================== Md. Sami, S/o Md. Mustaqua. Resident of Pachim Darwaza, P.S. Alamganj, District- Patna. At present 47, Makhanpur, Maharajganj, Idagab Road, Kurmi Tola, Patan Devi at Paschim Darwaza, P.S. Alamganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Patna G.R.P. Case No. 394 of 2011, registered for offence under Section 401 of the Indian Penal Code. The only allegation against the petitioner is the recovery of four pieces of caesarian blades, screw driver and bunch of keys from possession of the petitioner. It is submitted th...
Salo Thakur @ Surendra Thakur Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39433 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39433 of 2011 ====================================================== Salo Thakur @ Surendra Thakur .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ----------- 03/ 23.01.2012 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. There is specific allegation of gang rape against the petitioner but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that victim was examined by the doctor but no sign of rape has been found on her person. It is also contended on behalf of the petitioner that the victim has already given a petition before the learned court below disclosing this fact that no occurrence had taken place with her. It would appear from perusal of the record that alleged occurrence took place in the year 2000 and the petitioner could be...
Shaket Kuwar @ Chhotu@ Shaket Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44441 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Shaket Kuwar @ Chhotu alias Shaket Kumar Son of Sri Lalan Kumar Resident of Village - Saidpur, P.S. Gopalpur, District-Bhagalpur (Naugachia). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Bihpur P.S.Case No.168 of 2011 for the offence punishable under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the submissions of learned counsel that although the allegation made in the FI.R. is of snatching cash and mobile on gun point, the petitioner having been remanded from another case, has neither been ...
Renu Devi and anr Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2071 of 2012 ====================================================== Renu Devi & Anr .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that daughter of the informant went in the company of the petitioner Renu Devi being neighbor of the informant and thereafter she disappeared, subsequently victim was produced by the husband of petitioner Renu Devi who alleged that husband of Renu Devi took her somewhere. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for the occurrence of 05.10.2011 the F.I.R. was lodged on 04.11.2011. Considering the delayed lodging of the F.I.R., petitioners b...
Yogendra Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1160 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1160 of 2012 ====================================================== Yogendra Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 01.08.2011 in a case registered under Sections 148, 149, 324, 307, 341, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that he caused firearm injury on the head of the informant. It is submitted that no firearm injury has been found and the injury has been found to be simple and there is counter version of the occurrence also. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the a...
Rahul Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1842 of 2012 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 376/511, 323, 448 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(I) (X) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is alleged that the petitioner entered into the house and caught hold of the daughter of the informant but subsequently the petitioner was rescued by other accused persons. It is submitted that the informant has retracted from his initial version and even assuming the accusation made in the F.I.R. no case under Section 376 of the IPC is made o...
Chhote Raut and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3174 o1. Chhote Raut, Son of Late Tapeshwar Rout.2. Bablu Raut, Son of Chhote Raut. Both Resident of Mestar Tola, Ward No. 5, P. S. & District Sitamarhi. ...... Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ..... Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 23.01.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The only material in the fardbeyan is that the petitioners were last seen with the deceased. It is alleged that the petitioners came, called the deceased and deceased went away with the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that except the last seen, there is no other material and the Additional District and Sessions Judge has referred the various paragraphs of the case diary in his order that Ashit Rai has seen the accused fleeing away from the place of occurrence. It appear...
Sushil Kumar Lal Das Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2039 of 2012 Sushil Kumar Lal Das Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 23.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being 85 years old, is apprehending arrest in a case registered under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 20B of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of receiving freedom fighter pension on forged documents. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that still the writ application of the petitioner is pending before this Court and the State Government has not withdrawn the recommendations made. Though the recovery was stayed earlier, but the stay has been vacated later on. Considering the advance age of the petitioner and the fact that the writ petition with regard to dispute is still pending before this Court, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below...
Basant Sah Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2066 of 2012 ================================================= Basant Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ================================================23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of getting the sale deed executed under some misconception. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that since the quashing application was pending, no bail application was preferred earlier. It is further submitted that no suit has been filed for cancellation of the sale deed. Considering the nature of accusation arising out of a dispute of civil in nature, it is a fit case for grant of bail but since the complaint was filed in 2005, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. How...
Hardeo Jha and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1728 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1728 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Hardeo Jha 2. Triveni Devi 3. Shobhakant Jha @ Nunu Babu Jha.4. Manikant Jha. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. It is submitted that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 being the parents of the husband have already been arrested, hence their anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the application with regard to petitioner nos. 1 and 2 is dismissed as withdrawn. So far as petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are concerned, they being the brothers of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sect...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »