Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhullu Yadav @ Bholu Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1077 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1077 of 2012 ====================================================== Bhullu Yadav @ Bholu Yadav .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 21.12.2001 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 307, 323,324, 341, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and 17 of the Criminal law Amendment Act. The petitioner alleged to have assaulted with Garasa on the head and face of deceased. The statement has been made in the petition that the matter is pending since 2009 at the argument stage. One of the assailants Suresh Yadav and other have been granted bai...
Tarkeshwar Chaurasia and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38950 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38950 of 2011 ====================================================== Tarkeshwar Chaurasia & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY23. 01-2012 This case has been listed under the heading To be mentioned at the instance of petitioners. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioners that in para- 3 in the second line, expression them has been typed by mistake in place of opposite party No.2. Similarly in the last paragraph of the order, in place of petitioner Nos. 3 to 11, opposite party Nos. 3 to 11 has been wrongly typed. Let it be corre...
Rohit Giri @ Banti Giri Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30 of 2011 ====================================================== Rohit Giri @ Banti Giri, son of Omkar Nath Siri, of Village-Math Lohiyar, P.S. Harsidhi, District-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.N. Pandit, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 15.5.2009 passed by the 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Motihari, East Champaran in Cr. Rev. No. 120 of 2009, Tr. No. 1118 of 2009/2348 of 2010, ...
Ram Subodh Rai Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34565 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34565 of 2011 ====================================================== Ram Subodh Rai, S/O-Late Ram Shekhar Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 27.08.2011 in a case registered under Sections 120 B, 181, 193, 420, 468, 471 and 420 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, at the time of the alleged occurrence, petitioner was in jail custody and, at best, only a...
Ram Kewal Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40706 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40706 of 2011 =================================================== Ram Kewal Yadav, son of late Ramadhar Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Adhora P.S. Case No. 10/2011 for the offences under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case of abduction of daughter of the informant who though named in her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but alleged nothing. Moreover, police after investigation submitted charge-sheet against only co-accus...
Ashok Jang Bahadur Vs. the State of Bihar Andanr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.291 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.291 of 2011 ====================================================== Ashok Jang Bahadur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar &Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The present case has been filed by litigant against the counsel that he was required to return an amount Rs. 6,500/- stating that the bill which was furnished was not correct bill. Having considered the facts, let notice be issued to opposite party No. 2 under both modes i.e. ordinary process as well as registered cover with A/D for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week, failin...
Deo Nath Bhagat and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.756 of 2012 ====================================================== Deo Nath Bhagat & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.K. Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 15.7.2011 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in Complaint Case No.1393-C of 2010, whereby the learned Magistrate has been pleased to take cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code a...
Shanti Devi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3128 of 2012 Shanti Devi, wife of Rajendra Thakur, resident of village, Shiv Nagar, P.S. Bairginia, district Sitamarhi .. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .. Opposite party **** /2/ 23 January, Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2012 No one appears for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Sections 498A and 304B of the Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There is allegation that samdhi, Rajendra Thakur, demanded money, which is omni bus, and the husband of the petitioner, who happens to be father-in-law, has been acquitted in trial bearing S. Tr. No. 599 of 2010. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bairginia P.S. Case No. 89 of 2010 to the satisfaction o...
Tarkeshwar Chourasia and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38948 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38948 of 2011 Tarkeshwar Chourasia & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY23. 01-2012 This case has been listed under the heading To be mentioned at the instance of petitioners. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioners that in para- 3 in the second line, expression them has been typed by mistake in place of opposite party No.2. Similarly in the last paragraph of the order, in place of petitioner Nos. 3 to 10, opposite party Nos. 3 to 10 has been wrongly typed. Let it be corrected accordingly and the order is modified to that extent. One week time is further granted to petitioners wil...
Aakash Shahoo @ Shashank Shahoo @ Akash Sahoo and anr. Vs. the State o ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1671 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1671 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Aakash Shahoo @ Shashank Shahoo 2. Purnima Saw. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that it was agreed between the parties that the petitioner will supply the new chasis of the truck for Rs. 2,35,000/- out of which Rs. 1,99,200/- was paid to the petitioner through the bank draft and Rs. 35,000/- was paid by cash but the chasis was not supplied. It is submitted...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »