Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sushila Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1462 o1. Sushila Devi, wife of Yogendra Mahto.2. Raj Kumari Devi, wife of Hari Pd. Mahto.3. Babloo, son of Md. Rahman. All are resident of village-Nakkipur, P.S.-Korha, District- Katihar. Versus The State of Bihar -----------------11. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 448, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the allegation is omnibus and general in nature. Four persons are said to have sustained injuries in the alleged incident. The injuries are mostly simple in nature. Since petitioner nos. 1 and 2, namely, Sushila Devi and Raj Kumari Devi happen to be lady in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail o...
Anil Yadav and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.711 o1. Anil Yadav, 2. Pramod Yadav, 3. Brajesh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being office bearers of a chit fund company, are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 406, 420 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The thrust of accusation is against co accused Sujeet Kumar, who marketed the scheme and defalcated the amount. The wife of Sujeet Kumar and others having similar accusations, have been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 15537 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C....
Suresh Poddar Vs. the Chancellor, Raj Bhawan,pat
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.402 of 2012 Ram Pravesh Yadav Son Of Kailu Yadav Resident Of Village-Sultanpur, Mitti, P.O. & P.S.-Sabour, District-Bhagalpur . Petitioner Versus 1. The Chancellor, Raj Bhawan Patna 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District- Samastipur 3. The Registrar, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District-Samastipur 4. The Principal, Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour, P.O. & P.S. Sabour, District-Bhagalpur . Respondents with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.405 of 2012 Rajesh Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Rupan Yadav Resident Of Village Mirzapur, Via-Rajpur, P.O. & P.S.-Sabour, District-Bhagalpur Petitioner Versus 1. The Chancellor, Raj Bhawan, Patna 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District- Samastipur 3. The Registrar, Rajendra Agriculture University, Pusha, P.O. & P.S. Pusha, District-Samastipur 4. The Pr...
Rajesh Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.795 of 2012 Rajesh Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 Heard Mr. V.K. Seth, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. U.S. Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Accusations against several accused persons are to have made assault on the informant and his son. All the injuries have been found to be simple. There is counter version of the occurrence also and as per own admission of the informant, the occurrence took place on account of bonafide land dispute. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like am...
Santosh Kumar Sharma @ Santosh Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36290 of 2011 Santosh Kumar Sharma @ Santosh Kumar, Son of Upendra Sharma, resident of Village-Mafo, Police Station-Mehus, District- Sheikhpura ----------------------------- Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------11. 01-2012 Heard Sri Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Hirday Narayan Singh, Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of an order dated 06.09.2011 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, F. T.C. III, Sheikhpura in Sessions Trial No.373A of 2011, whereby the learned trial Judge has rejected the petition filed for discharge under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of occurrence, he was already in his Institute at Jabalpur and, as such, there was no occasion for the petitioner to remain present at the place of occurrence. It was further submitted that the case was inve...
Suresh Mahto and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.674 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Suresh Mahto.2. Indu Devi. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================11. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioners is of assaulting Kharesh Mahto and Laxman Mahto. The injury report of Kharesh Mahto has been brought on record, as contained in Annexure-2, which reflects simple injury where as the injury report of Laxman Mahto is not on record. It has submitted that no injury report of Laxman Mahto is on record till date. Considering the fact that the petitioners have not caused any grievous injury to the informant, let the above named petitioners be releas...
Dr. Parasu Ram Yadav and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5203 of 2010 Dr. Kanhaiya Jee Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.659 of 2011 Chandra Bhushan Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1430 of 2011 Dr. Rajeshwar Singh Versus Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.384 of 2011 Ram Mohan Prasad Mehta Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.521 of 2011 Prabhakar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.616 of 2011 Dr. Ram Naresh Chandra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1734 of 2011 Anant Mohan Jha Versus The Bhupendra Narayan Mand...
Kanhaiya Sao and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1547 of 2012 Kanhaiya Sao @ Kanhaiya Kumar & Guddu Sao @ Guddu Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 11.01.2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered under Sections 420 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the alleged date of occurrence is 15.07.2011 but the FIR has been instituted on 11.08.2011. The petitioners happen to be the nephew of the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Kanhaiya Sao @ Kanhaiya Kumar and Guddu Sao @ Guddu Kumar in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand)each with two sureties of the...
Dr. Rajeshwar Singh Vs. Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5203 of 2010 Dr. Kanhaiya Jee Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.659 of 2011 Chandra Bhushan Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1430 of 2011 Dr. Rajeshwar Singh Versus Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.384 of 2011 Ram Mohan Prasad Mehta Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.521 of 2011 Prabhakar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.616 of 2011 Dr. Ram Naresh Chandra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1734 of 2011 Anant Mohan Jha Versus The Bhupendra Narayan Mand...
Ram Sawroop Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5240 of 2011 Ram Sawroop Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------11. 1.2012 The petitioner, who is about 87 years of age, has been litigating for his freedom fighter pension. It was sanctioned, paid and then stopped. He approached this Court and this Court directed holding that the criminal case filed against the petitioner for wrongful claim has been dismissed and directed restoration of pension and payment of arrears. When that was not done a contempt application was filed. That was disposed of on 28.2.2011 with a direction to the Collector cum- District Magistrate, Bhojpur to ensure payment of arrears and ensure payment of the pension month to month. This not having done, a second contempt application was filed. It is stated that a show cause has been filed by the opposite party. Let Registry trace out and put up along with the records. In the show cause it is stated that about...
- ‹ Prev
- 199
- 200
- 201
- 202
- 203
- 205
- 206
- 207
- 208
- 209
- Next ›
- Last »