Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Roushan Khatoon @ Rousan Ansari Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.207 of 2012 Roushan Khatoon @ Rousan Ansari Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the mother of the husband is languishing in custody since 06.09.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Though the death has occurred within two years of marriage in the background of accusations of dowry demand and torture but it appears that the victim found dead in the room but door was closed from inside and cause of death was found due to asphyxia by hanging. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the husband is in custody. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against the husband, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Kisha...
Taj Mohammad Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1045 of 2012 ============================================== Taj Mohammad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =============================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the father of the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 328 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of administering poison. It appears that the victim was treated by the Doctor and during the postmortem no injury was found particularly resisting injury. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief ...
Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.190 of 2012 Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 02- 13.1.2012 Heard Mr. Mithilesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.9.2011 passed in Complaint Case No.3390 of 2010/Trial No.507 of 2011 by Sri Jitendra Kumar Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, whereby he has been pleased to take cognizance of the offences punishable under section 323 of the Indian penal Code and section 3(1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989, against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to the allegations set out in the complaint placed at Annexure-1 of the application and the statement on oath made by the complainant placed on record by way of a supplementary affidavit filed today during...
Lallu Pasad @ Lallu Prasad Sao and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34254 of 2011 Lallu Prasad @ Lallu Prasad Sao & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 3. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. By order dated 13.10.2011 notice was issued to opposite party no.2. From the service report it appears that one Gautam Kumar, grand-son is purported to have received notice on behalf of opposite party no.2. The petitioners are directed either to file affidavit making statement that Gautam Kumar is grand- son of opposite party no.2 and they are joint or file a fresh notice on him within a period of two weeks under ordinary course as well as registered post with A/D with the present and correct address, failing which this application as against him shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Vinay/ ( Shivaji Pandey, J.)...
Archna Devi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1168 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Arun Ram S/O Ram Shresth Ram R/O Village- Runni, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.2. Rina Devi W/O Om Prakash Rai R/O Village- Chiktane, P.S.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi 3. Mukesh Singh S/O Late Surendra Singh R/O Village- Choraut, P.S.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi 4. Jitendra Patel S/O Gonaur Raut R/O Village- Manikchowk, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi 5. Ashok Prasad Gupta @ Ashok Kumar Gupta S/O Nandipat Gupta R/O Village- Manikchowk (North), P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi 6. Ram Sikil Devi W/O Birendra Thakur R/O Village- Baligarh (Dewna Bujurg), P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi 7. Sanjogia Devi W/O Sri Girija Rai R/O Village- Piprahi, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.8. Amit Kala Devi W/O Bishwanath Prasad @ Bishwanath Sah R/O Village- Kumma, P.S.- Susand, District- Sitamarhi.9. Rausan Ara W/O Md. Israil R/O Vill...
Dinanath Paswan and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 43199 o1. Dinanath Paswan, S/o Late Devpujan Paswan, Resident of Village - Ghusian, P.S.- Nokha, District Rohtas.2. Sanjay Paswan, S/o Devinath Paswan, Resident of Village - Ghusian, P.S.- Nokha, District Rohtas.3. Sri Kant Paswan, S/o Devinath Paswan, Resident of Village - Ghusian, P.S.- Nokha, District Rohtas.4. Raju Paswan, S/o Devinath Paswan, Resident of Village - Ghusian, P.S.- Nokha, District Rohtas.5. Sri Bhagwan Paswan, S/o Devinath Paswan, Resident of Village - Ghusian, P.S.- Nokha, District Rohtas. Versus 1. The State of Bihar ------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioners happen to be the father and brothers of the deceased whose wife complained that her husband had been killed by her in-laws sinc...
Vinod Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19892 of 2011 Vinod Singh & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 7. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are in jail custody since 04.04.2011 in a case initially registered under Section 498-A and of the Dowry Prohibition Act but latter on Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code was added and furthermore, charge- sheet has been submitted under Section 304-b/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, petitioner No. 1 is brother-in-law whereas petitioner No. 2 is father-in-law of the deceased and the case was lodged on the basis of fardbayan of the victim who later on died. In her statement, the victim stated that on 27.01.2009 she was confined in a room and petitioners as well as other co-accused persons lit the fire on her body. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that as a matter of fact,...
Randhir Mishra @ Randher Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31559 of 2011 Randhir Mishra @ Randher Mishra, S/O-Radha Krishna Mishra @ Batohi Mishra Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 15.07.2011 in a case registered under Sections 302, 120b/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Although, petitioner is named in the first information report but there is only allegation against him in the statement of the informant that prior to the alleged occurrence he had demanded extortion money from him but in course of investigation, one so- called eye-witness claimed before the Investigating Officer that he had seen the alleged occurrence and had also seen the petitioner and other accused persons making firing upon the deceased. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that according to prosecu...
Dasharath Pd. Singh @ Malik Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2081 of 2012 Dasharath Pd. Singh @ Malik Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 This is an application for restoration of Cr.Misc.No. 39466 of 2008 which stood rejected for not having been complied with the peremptory order dated 25.10.2011 within time granted to the petitioner to file requisite for issuance of notice on opposite party no.2 under both process. It appears that due to inadvertence the word informant in 2nd line of paragraph no.1 of order dated 25.10.2011 in Cr.Misc.No. 39466 of 2008 has been wrongly written in place of accused persons as the application for quashing has been preferred by the informant himself. Let the word informant in 2nd line of paragraph 1 of order dated 25.10.2011 (Cr.Misc.No. 39466 of 2008) be read as accused persons. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead the accused persons as opposite parties in the main application and on doing so,...
State of Bihar Vs. Ghasita Singh and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.235 of 1982 State Of Bihar Versus Ghasita Singh & Anr ---------------------------------- 24. 13.01.2012 The learned counsel, Mr. Ajay Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.6 submitted that the valuation of the First Appeal is only Rs.98,045 and, therefore, in view of the notification of the State Govt. vide Notification No.15/DLA Policy- Lok Adalat-03/03-1495/Rev., Patna, dated 20.08.2010, he may be permitted to withdraw this First Appeal. Perused the notification of the State Govt. referred to above. In the said notification, it has been stated that First Appeal cases pertaining to land acquisition matter filed by the State Govt. in which total compensation amount involved is upto Rs.1 lakh should be withdrawn with immediate effect. Admittedly the First Appeal arises out of land acquisition matter and the valuation is less than Rs.1 lakh and, therefore, the appellant is permitted to withdraw this First Appeal. Thus, this First Appeal is di...
- ‹ Prev
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- 183
- Next ›
- Last »