Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Badri Rai and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37413 o1. Badri Rai, S/O-Baleshwar Rai 2. Umesh Paswan, S/O-Pradip Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing has been recovered from possession of petitioner no. 1 and so far as recovery of motorcycle from possession of petitioner no. 2 is concerned, the said motorcycle had been purchased by the petitioner and the same has already been released in favour of father of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur in connection with Sonepur, Hazipur Rail P.S. Case No. 54...
Harish Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.186 of 2012 Harish Kumar Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 14.11.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of robbing the motorcycle of the informant when F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. On confession of one Shailesh Kumar, petitioners name sprang up who has been granted bail by this Court. It is submitted that there is no recovery from petitioner and petitioner was involved in one other case in which he is on bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No.112 of 2010. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)...
Sova Chand Agarwal and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39518 of 2011 Sova Chand Agarwal & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. According to the First Information Report it appears that this case has been lodged against the petitioners as they have illegally occupied the land of the Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Samiti and have illegally cultivating plantation of tea leaves. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that they have made a specific statement that the land mentioned in the F.I.R. is not in possession of the petitioners and they are doing plantations of tea over their own land or land leased out by the State Government in their favour for the said purpose. He has further submitted that they have no concerned with any land of the Bihar Bhoodan Yagna Samiti. Let notices be issued to opposite party no.2 to 5 under ordinary course as well as reg...
Md. Sohil Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1015 of 2012 Md. Sohil Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A of the I.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid stand of the parties, let the petitioner namely Md. Sohil, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Complaint Case No. 681 of 2011. Let learned Court below issue notice to the complainant and fix a date for her appearance. O...
Bijendra Gope and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No 18 of 2012 Bijendra Gope & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar ----------------------13. 01.2012 This appeal will be heard. Call for the lower Court records. The main allegation is that Naresh Gope had fired from his rifle fatally injuring Sheonandan Mahto, the deceased. The rest were present there though variously armed. There is no injury on any other person or upon the deceased apart from a singular gunshot injury. Appellants have been convicted with the aid of Section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Be that as it may, the appellants Bijendra Gope, Karu Gope @ Dharmendra Gope, Rama Gope, Suresh Gope, Kapil Gope, Karu Gope, Suresh Gope and Boudhu Gope @ Arjun Gope, during pendency of this appeal, shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge V, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Sessions Trial No 46...
Santosh Rai and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40338 o1. Santosh Rai, S/O Shesh Nath Rai 2. Shushil Rai S/O Shesh Nath Rai 3. Shesh Nath Rai S/O Late Sakaldip Rai, all are Village Jabahi Jagdishpur, P.S. Brahampur, District Buxar ----- Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Surya Rai, S/O Late Ram Janam Rai, resident of Village- Jabahi Jagdishpur, P.O Hathilpur, P.S. Brahmapur, District Buxar ----- Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. On the basis of the statement made before the Officer Incharge, Buxar on 14.10.2009 this case was instituted and thereafter final form was submitted by the police on the ground that it was a misfired by the informant himself and thereafter on the basis of the protest petition cognizance has been taken under Sections 323 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code. For the present this Court does not want to interfere with the impugned ord...
Radhey Shyam Seth Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1032 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sachidanand Seth, S/O Radhey Shyam Seth.2. Permanand Seth, S/O Radhey Shyam Seth.3. Vikash Seth, S/O Satyanand Seth. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.1364 of 2012 ====================================================== Radhey Shyam Seth, S/O Late Gunraj Seth @ Gunram Seth. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.1908 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Krishna Murari Seth, S/O Late Gunram Seth.2. Prem Prakash Seth, S/O Krishna Murari Seth. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-20...
Ram Chandra Bind and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36561 o1. Ram Chandra Bind, Son of Mallu Bind. 2.Lachn Bind @ Laxhuman Bind, Son of Shyama Bind. 3.Surendra Bind, Son of Late Vishwanath Bind. 4.Munna Bind, Son of Late Sanehi Bind. 5.Rogi Bind, Son of Late Juthan Bind. 6.Dudh Nath Bind, Son of Late Bagedu Bind. 7.Kashi Bind, Son of Late Bhagat Bind. 8.Shiv Dular Bind, Son of Late Govind Bind. 9.Bagedan Bind, Son of Late Khobhari Bind. All R/o Village Rudrawar Kala Tola Sitampura, P.S. Sonhan, District Kaimur. -------Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ---------------- 06/- 13/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the nine petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 427, 380, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (x), (xv) of S...
Brij Kishore Yadav @ Virij Kishore Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.955 of 2012 Brij Kishore Yadav @ Virij Kishore Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 272, 273/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 47A of the Excise Act. The premises of one Jaiprakash Yadav was raided where 52 litres of country made liquor were seized. It is alleged that one Jitendra Kumar succeeded in fleeing away from the place of seizure. It is alleged against this petitioner that petitioner took the premises of Jaiprakash Yadav on rent. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is nothing on record that premises of Jaiprakash Yadav were hired by the petitioner. It is further submitted that for the seizure made on 12.06.2011, the F.I.R. was lodged on the same day, but it was transmitted to learned Court below on 14.06.2011 which further clouds the bona fide of the accu...
Baleshwar Tanti and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1114 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Baleshwar Tanti.2. Rupmani Devi.3. Sunil Tanti. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the informants sister-in-law (Bhabhi) was abducted by one Binod Tanti. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for the occurrence of 23.06.2011 the F.I.R was lodged on 04.07.2011 and considering the materials in the case diary Binod Tanti has been granted regular bail by learned court below. Considering the delayed lodging of the F.I.R. and the fact that the thrust of the accusation is against Binod Tanti who has been granted regular bail by learned...
- ‹ Prev
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- Next ›
- Last »