Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajeev Nayan Kumar@ Jugnu Sharma and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1134 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Rajeev Nayan Kumar@ Jugnu Sharma @ Juguni Sharma 2. Shivkesh @ Shivkesh Sharma .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the agnates are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of making assault. The injury has been found to be simple. It is submitted that there is counter version of the occurrence also and there is bona fide land dispute between the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing...
Dhiraj Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1857 of 2012 Dhiraj Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar 2/ 13thJanuary 2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead informant as O.P. No.2. Petitioner happens to husband of O.P. No.2. It happens to be a case under Section 498A IPC and as such it looks desirable to have the presence of O.P. No.2. As such, Issue notice to O.P.No.2 as to why this application be not admitted or disposed of at the stage of admission itself. Requisites for notice by ordinary process as well as under registered cover with A/D must be filed within two weeks failing which this application as against O.P. No.2 shall stand rejected without any further reference to the Bench. Till appearance of O.P. No.2, no coercive action against the petitioner, Dhiraj Paswan shall be taken in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 93 of 2009 pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna. ( Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) perwez...
Chandan Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.923 of 2012 Chandan Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 448, 322, 384, 379, 504, 506/34 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that petitioner made fire in the air and threatened for payment of extortion amount and after making assault, took Rs. 50,500/- from the cash book of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner happens to be the brother-in-law(sala) of the informant and due to some land dispute, the present case has been lodged. A statement has been made in para 7 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Chandan Kumar, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail ...
Manoj Ram Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.179 of 2012 Manoj Ram Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 15.07.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of robbing Rs. 46700. The name of the petitioner sprang up on confession of co-accused. It is submitted that neither any recovery from possession of petitioner has been made nor the petitioner has been put on T. I. Parade. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and other accused have been granted bail by this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Bagaha (West Champaran)in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 264 of 201...
Lalan Sharma and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42679 o1. Lalan Sharma S/o Nathuni Sharma 2. Saraswati Devi @ Sursati Devi W/o Lalan Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail by the court below but could not surrender on time and, therefore, they still apprehend their arrest, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Compliant case No.405 of 2010 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj (Rohtas), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)...
Madan Rai Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1059 of 2012 ====================================================== Madan Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the own brother of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that Rs. 45,000/- were invested in Kisan Vikas Patra but on its maturity the complainant was not given his share of the maturity amount. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to the maturity the participation took place between the parties and consequently the fixed deposit Schemes were withdrawn prior to its maturity with the signature of both, the petitioner and complainant. Considering the accusation arising out of property dispute betwee...
Satya Narayan Prasad @ Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15341 of 2010 Satya Narayan Prasad @ Prasad Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 8. 13.01.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner appears and states that notices could not be served for want of the correct address of the opposite party no.2. Let notices be issued to the Opposite Party No. 2 under Registered cover with A.D if the correct address is ascertainable by the petitioner. Let ordinary process of notice also be served upon the complainant through his counsel appearing before the learned Court below through the office of the learned Court below. In the event that no counsel is appearing, let the notice be kept on the record of the learned lower Court for being served upon the complainant as and when he appears. Requisites for the above must be filed within two weeks. Post this matter after service of notice. ( Vikash Jain, J.) Fahad....
Rakesh Mohan Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24105 of 2011 Rakesh Mohan Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13/1/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The counsel for the petitioner is directed to make an informant as opposite party No. 2 in this case. In this case, a complaint petition was filed before the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur stating that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner on 9.7.2008 on the advice of accused Nos. 2, 3 & 4. After marriage at about 12.00 in the midnight they went to Puja Hotel and they stayed in night and left the Hotel next day. After marriage, the husband is established relationship with her. After sometime husband started putting pressure upon her to execute and agreement regarding a Hero-Honda Motorcycle, cash for purchase of 2 Katha of land at Gannipur. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner is ready to keep h...
Pintu Bind and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42188 o1. Pintu Bind, son of Deo Nandan Bind, 2. Sabita Devi, wife of Pintu Bind, ------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar --Opposite Party ******* 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No. 18/2011 for offence sunder Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case being brother and sister-in-law (Jaith & Jethani) of deceased sister of the informant who died under unnatural circumstances within three years of her marriage after suffering a lot for certain demands. Submission is of general and omnibus allegation and after investigation police though submitted charge-sheet against others but exonerated the petitioners. However, taking a different view, cognizance has been taken in this case against all including the petitioners. ...
Sanjiv Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33505 of 2011 Sanjiv Singh, Son of Ram Kishore Kunwar, R/o Village Binodpur, P.S. Mufassil, District Begusarai. -------Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar -----Opposite Party ----------------- 04/- 13/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 188 of the Indian Penal Code and 47(A) Excise Act, is one of the named accused in this case being owner of one Bolero pick-up Van bearing no. Br-09H/2600 seized along with another vehicle loaded with wine. Submission is that the wine etc. were belonging to other co-accused and petitioner has no concern with the same and only the vehicle was used by the driver to carry. Further, petitioner has no criminal antecedent. If, it is so, in the event of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- Next ›
- Last »