Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhiraj Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar

Dhiraj Paswan vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974844

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhiraj Paswan

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1857 of 2012 dhiraj paswan versus the state of bihar 2/ 13thjanuary 2012 learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead informant as o.p. no.2. petitioner happens to husband of o.p. no.2. it happens to be a case under section 498a ipc and as such it looks desirable to have the presence of o.p. no.2. as such, issue notice to o.p.no.2 as to why this application be not admitted or disposed of at the stage of admission itself. requisites for notice by ordinary process as well as under registered cover with a/d must be filed within two weeks failing which this application as against o.p. no.2 shall stand rejected without any further reference to the bench. till appearance of o.p. no.2, no coercive action against the petitioner, dhiraj paswan shall be taken in connection with malsalami p.s. case no. 93 of 2009 pending before additional chief judicial magistrate, patna city, patna. ( aditya kumar trivedi, j.) perwez

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1857 of 2012 Dhiraj Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar 2/ 13thJanuary 2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead informant as O.P. No.2. Petitioner happens to husband of O.P. No.2. It happens to be a case under Section 498A IPC and as such it looks desirable to have the presence of O.P. No.2. As such, Issue notice to O.P.No.2 as to why this application be not admitted or disposed of at the stage of admission itself. Requisites for notice by ordinary process as well as under registered cover with A/D must be filed within two weeks failing which this application as against O.P. No.2 shall stand rejected without any further reference to the Bench. Till appearance of O.P. No.2, no coercive action against the petitioner, Dhiraj Paswan shall be taken in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 93 of 2009 pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna. ( Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) perwez

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial