Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandra Shekhar Thakur Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20350 of 2011 Chandra Shekhar Thakur, son of Ram Lochan Thakur, Resident of village Kuari, P.S. Sursand, District Sitamarhi. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 3. 13.1.2012. Heard Shri Pushpendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri M.K. Khare, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. In the present case, petitioner has made a prayer for quashing of an order dated 6.6.2006 whereby the learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri at Sitamarhi has taken cognizance of the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code in Sursand P.S. Case No.7 of 2004 dated 28.1.2004/G.R. No.26 of 2004. In paragraph-9 of the petition, it has been stated that in this case, charges have already been framed on 1.3.2011. In view of the facts and circumstances, no order can be passed for quashing of order of cognizance. The petition stands dismissed. N.H./ ( Rakesh Ku...
Rabinesh Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43083 o1. Rabinesh Kumar son of late Amnesh Kumar 2. Badri Nath S/o Rama Rao Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioners themselves are salaried employees of the company and at best a case for Money Suit is made out, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Complaint case No.1256(c) of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Reshma Verma, J.M. 1st class, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Pro...
Anila JaIn Vs. the Patna Regional Development
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1794 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5791 of 2006 With Interlocutory Application No. 8108 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1794 of 2011 ====================================================== Anila Jain .... .... Appellant/s Versus The Patna Regional Development Authority and Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sarwan Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondent nos. 1-4:Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kr. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent No. 5 : Mr. J.S.Arora with Mr. Arun, Advocates. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE13. 01-2012 Re. Interlocutory Application No. 8108 of 2011: The delay of 133 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is cond...
Haidar Ali Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36383 of 2011 Haidar Ali Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the complainant as opposite party no.2. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 24.12.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bagaha, West Champaran in Complaint Case not C-481 of 2009 whereby the learned Magistrate has been pleased to take cognizance against the petitioner for the offences under Section 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that all cause of action has taken place in the State of Uttar Pradesh and as such the order of cognizance is wrong. Issue notice to opposite party no.2 under ordinary course as well as registered post with A/D for which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of one wee...
Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31622 of 2010 Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar For the petitioner: Mr.Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate. For the State: Mr. J.K.Roy-1, Advocate13. 1.2012 The present application is for quashing the order dated 25.4.2008 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, in Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No.253 of 2005 corresponding to G.R. No.2093/05 whereby he has taken cognizance under sections 341,323,504,379,353/34 of I.P.C. on the basis of submission of charge sheet. The informant, one Dinesh Kumar Rai, constable posted at Muzaffarpur, as Body Guard of 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, has submitted a written report containing various allegations of assault and snatching etc. against the petitioner who is practicing lawyer at Muzaffarpur, on the basis of which the F.I.R. has been registered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the version of the informant has not been cor...
Morepen Laboratories Limited and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41823 of 2011 Morepen Laboratories Limited & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------13. 01-2012 Issue notice to Opp.Party no.2 to file show cause as to why this petition be not disposed of at the admission stage itself. Notice to go through ordinary post as well as registered cover with A/D, for which requisites etc. must be filed within ten days, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. In the meanwhile, the petitioners are also required to file supplementary affidavit indicating therein the detail of cases instituted against them in the similar manner. It is made clear that while passing order for issuance of notice, the Court has refused the prayer for granting stay of further proceeding in the court below. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.) NKS/-...
Omnidhi @ Omnidhi Vatsa and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42227 o1. Omnidhi @ Omnidhi Vatsa, son of Braj Kishore Mishra, resident of village Tandhwalia, P.S. Bagaha (Pathkauli O.P.).2. Saket Samir, son of Shri Narain Pathak, resident of village Pathkauli, P.S. Bagaha (Pathkauli O.P.), Both District West Champaran. --------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ********* 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Bagaha (Pathkauli) P.S. Case No. 89/2011 for offences under Sections 147, 149, 109, 323, 353, 337, 338, 332, 307, 435, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case. Submission is that one Binod Sah has already been granted privilege by a Bench of this court vide order dated 21.12.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 43880/2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest ...
Akhtari Begam and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1049 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Akhtari Begam.2. Parwez Alam. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of abducting minor daughter of the informant. 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim girl reflects that she has married of her own with one Tabrej and considering the same Tabrej has been granted bail by this Court. It is submitted that the petitioners are the brother and mother of Tabrej. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from t...
Murari Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42232 o1. Murari Singh son of Upendra Singh 2. Dasu Singh @ Desh Deepak, son of Murari Singh 3. Soni Singh @ Satrughan Kumar Singh, S/o Jagdish Singh 4. Bobi Singh @ Viveka Nand Singh, S/o Ujjawal Singh 5. Ajit Singh, S/o Late Maheshwar Singh All are resident of village Dariyapur, P.S. Sajour (Shahkund), District Bhagalpur. --------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar --Opposite Party ********* 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 180/2011 for offences under Sections 341, 323, 327/34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case of assault and abuse to the informant blaming him as thieve. Submission is that not only case appears squarely covered under the decision of Apex Court in a case Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of A.P. reported in 2009(1...
Kishori Vishwakarma Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.72 of 2012 Kishori Vishwakarma Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the father of the husband is languishing in custody since 21.10.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 304(B), and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demanding motorcycle and gold chain and on non fulfillment of same, the victim was killed and her dead body was put on Railway track. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is suffering from paralysis and the husband is in custody. There is general accusation against entire family members of the in- laws. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya, in connection with F...
- ‹ Prev
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- Next ›
- Last »