Murari Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Murari Singh and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974875

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974875
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 13, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murari Singh and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned additional public prosecutor for the state. the petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with shahkund (sajour) p.s. case no. 180/2011 for offences under sections 341, 323, 327/34 of the indian penal code, are named accused in this case of assault and abuse to the informant blaming him as thieve. submission is that not only case appears squarely covered under the decision of apex court in a case jorgia pentiah vs. state of a.p. reported in 2009(1) bccr 153 sc), but compromise has also been affected and due application has been filed which is on record. if, it is so, and the informant appearing before the court below on due identification admits factum of compromise with his free-will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, bhagalpur, in connection with shahkund (sajour) p.s. case no. 180/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. rajeev/- ( akhilesh chandra, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42232 o”

1. Murari Singh son of Upendra Singh 2. Dasu Singh @ Desh Deepak, son of Murari Singh 3. Soni Singh @ Satrughan Kumar Singh, S/o Jagdish Singh 4. Bobi Singh @ Viveka Nand Singh, S/o Ujjawal Singh 5. Ajit Singh, S/o Late Maheshwar Singh All are resident of village Dariyapur, P.S. Sajour (Shahkund), District Bhagalpur. --------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar --Opposite Party ********* 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 180/2011 for offences under Sections 341, 323, 327/34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case of assault and abuse to the informant blaming him as thieve. Submission is that not only case appears squarely covered under the decision of Apex Court in a case Jorgia Pentiah Vs. State of A.P. reported in 2009(1) BCCR 153 SC), but compromise has also been affected and due application has been filed which is on record. If, it is so, and the informant appearing before the court below on due identification admits factum of compromise with his free-will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors, and in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 180/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Murari Singh and ors. vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education