Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Durga Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32323 of 2011 Durga Singh, son of Ram Dayal Singh, resident of Mohalla Fazalganj, (Sasaram), P.S. Sasaram (Model), District Rohtas. ------ Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -------Opposite Party ****** 04. 16.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Official Case No. 39/2002 for the offences under Sections 40/41 of the Bihar Mines and Mineral Concession Rules 1972 and Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this 10 years old case relating to mines and minerals etc. Submission is that since petitioners parentage etc. were not mentioned neither any step was ever served upon him nor he has any knowledge. The submission appeared substantiated from the entire order sheet of the court below filed along with supplementary affidavit. Considering the facts and circumstances of ...
Manish Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35547 o1. Manish Kumar, son of Shambhu Singh 2. Mithilesh Kumar Singh @ Mithilesh Singh Mital, son of Mohan Singh 3. Maltu Singh, son of Narendra Singh 4. Sintu Kumar @ Santu Kumar Singh, son of Ashok Singh 5. Rahul Kumar Singh, son of Budhu Singh 6. Saket Kumar Singh @ Saket Kumar, son of Lalan Singh 7. Chinku Singh @ Pandey, son of Pradeep Singh 8. Mukesh Singh, son of Lalan Singh All are resident of village Aeroo, P.S. Wazirganj, District Gaya. ------- Petitioners. Versus The State of Bihar ------Opposite Party ******* 03. 16.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 69/2011 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 of the Indian Penal Code, and 27 of the Arms Act, are named accused in this case of assault. Submission is that there is counter version also...
Shyam Sunder Choudhary Vs. the State of Bihar Through Vig
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23825 of 2011 Shyam Sunder Choudhary son of late Chunnu Lal Choudhary, resident of village Purnea City, P.S. Purnea Sadar, District Purnea. Versus The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance ---------------------------------- 4. 16.1.2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Narendra Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Shri Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for opposite party/Vigilance Investigation Bureau. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of part of the order dated 27.10.2010 passed in Special Case No.40 of 2010, whereby the learned Special Judge, in absence of order of prosecution sanctioned, had not taken cognizance and petitioner was directed to be provisionally released on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on the basis of orders passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. No.33606 of 2009 disposed of on 16.9.2009 as well as Cr. Misc. No.28930 of 2009 disposed of on 12.1.2010, has su...
Uday Rai and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1280 of 2012 Uday Rai & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors 2. 16.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the mother and brother of husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed in 2008. It is alleged that the victim was killed due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand. There is general accusation against the entire in- laws family including the petitioners. Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against the husband as it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the husband is in custody, let the petitioners, Uday Rai and Most. Dharamshila Devi, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Shahpur (Patna) P.S. Case No. 057 of 2010 on furnishing bai...
Md. Obesh @ Md. Ubaid Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43938 of 2011 Md. Ubesh @ Md. Ubaid Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------16. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is in jail custody since 18-06-2011. Admittedly, petitioner is husband of the victim girl and furthermore, it would appear from perusal of Annexujre-2 to this petition that the victim had left her matrimonial home voluntarily and went to the house of her relative. There is some sort of allegation of torturing against the petitioner and submission on behalf of the petitioner is that there is no chance of reconciliation between the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties and also keeping in mind the period of dentition of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Ubesh @ Md. Ubaid be released on bail on furnishing bail...
Ram Vinay Giri and anr Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1289 of 2012 Ram Vinay Giri & Anr Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 16.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of making assault, snatching jewellery and cash amount. It is submitted that petitioners side being the agnates of the informant earlier lodged case against the informant. It is further submitted that no injury was caused to any one. Considering the fact that for the occurrence of 03.12.2011, F.I.R. lodged on 12.12.2011 which clouds the bonafide of accusation, let the petitioners, Ram Vinay Giri and Mukesh Giri, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 145 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten 2 T...
Anil Kumar Mourya Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1219 of 2012 Anil Kumar Mourya Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 16.01.2012. Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the D. P. Act. Though before the learned court below the petitioner was not ready to keep the complainant as wife but undertaking is being given before this Court that now the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid stand of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with complaint case no. 695 of 2010 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two s...
Ashraful Haque @ Prince Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2342 of 2012 (2) dt.16-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2342 of 2012 ====================================================== Ashraful Haque @ Prince .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================16. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that now father, showing shooter of the deceased in his (deceaseds) dying declaration, is allowed bail by a Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 22918 of 2011. Taking the same into consideration, prayer of the petitioner for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Vaishali in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 497 of 2010. (Mandhata Singh, J.) Shailend...
RavIn @ Ravindra Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1285 of 2012 Ravin @ Ravindra Paswan Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 16.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1- b)a, 2C and 35 of the Arms Act. On raid is being conducted certain persons with arms were arrested who disclosed the name of petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is respectable person and in paragraph no. 10 of petition it has been mentioned that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Farbesganj P.S. Case No. 390 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the l...
Sanpato Devi @ Sampato Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-16-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1241 of 2012 Sanpato Devi @ Sampato Devi & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 16.01.2012. Heard Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner being the wife, brothers, uncle of husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge sheet has been submitted under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code when the cognizance has been taken under Section 306 of the I.P.C. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, Sanpato Devi @ Sampato Devi, Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Singh, Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Singh, Raman Singh @ Ramanand Singh and Raju Singh, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of 2 twelve weeks from toda...
- ‹ Prev
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- Next ›
- Last »