Orissa Court October 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fazle Rub JalaluddIn Khan Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-04-2005
Reported in: 101(2006)CLT58; 2005(II)OLR747
I.M. Quddusi, J.1. The petitioner has raised his grievance by challenging the impugned order dated 27.7.2005 passed by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Bhubaneswar in Original Application No. 1132 of 2002. The Original Application was filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal challenging the disciplinary order of his borrowing department in not relieving him for accepting his ad hoc promotion in the parent department. It: was alleged that he was detained in the borrowing department despite receipt of his ad hoc promotion in order to be punished through a disciplinary process. The Original Application was dismissed by the Tribunal on the ground that the petitioner had not made any appeal against the order of the Disciplinary Authority. The contention of the petitioner before the Tribunal was that since the impugned order was passed by the orders of the Governor, there would be no appeal against such orders under the O.C.S. (C.C. & A) Rules. 1962.2. The Tribunal disposed of the Orig...
Union of India (Uoi) Represented Through Its Gen. Manager, South Easte ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-04-2005
Reported in: 101(2006)CLT125; [2006(109)FLR131]
ORDER1. Heard Mr. A.K. Mishra, Learned Counsel for the Railways and Mr. Ashok Das, Learned Counsel for the caveator-Opp. Party.2. This Writ Application is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.10.2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No. 107 of 2002, which was filed by the caveator-Opp. Party. The Tribunal allowed the Original Application holding that the caveator-Opp. Party is entitled to get the family pension and consequently directed the petitioners to immediately grant family pension to her by computing the entire period of service rendered by her husband in the Railways.3. The facts of the case are that the Late husband of the caveator-Opp. Party, namely, Brahmananda Pati was initially engaged as temporary Railway employee under the Bridge Inspector, South Eastern Railway, Bhadrak on 24.9.1970 on casual basis with authorised scale of pay. His widow, i.e. the caveator-Opp. Party filed the Original Application before the Centr...
G. Srinivas Goud Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-03-2005
Reported in: 101(2006)CLT129
Arun Kumar, J.1. These two appeals arise from a common judgment of the High Court maintaining the conviction of the appellants under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act') and sentencing both of them to rigorous imprisonment for ten years and a fine of rupees one lakh each, in default of payment of fine further imprisonment of six months to the defaulter.2. As per the prosecution case, P.W. 1, who happens to be the Assistant Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, received information about illegal possession of diazepam in premises bearing No. 12-13-700/2, Nagarjun Nagar, Tamaka, Secunderabad. Diazepam is a banned drug under the Act. On receipt of this information he prepared a memo of search proceedings and proceeded to the place in question along with two constables. On his way he took two persons along, one of them being a police constable, to act as mediators/independent persons. The memo of search proceeding is Exhibit P-1....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›