Madhya Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deependra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3413/2013 16.08.2013 Shri Ajay Kumar Jain Advocate with Shri Vinay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Shahin Fatima, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of the fiRs.information report registered by Police Bareilly at Crime No.55/2013, under Sections 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and other accused persons. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with prayer that Police should investigate the offence fairly and that the contentions of the petitioner be also heard by the police. It is directed that if the petitioner makes an application for submitting any document, it shall be considered by the Investigating Officer and the Investigating Officer shall conduct the investigation of the offence fairly against the petitioner. Subject to aforesaid directions, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copy as...
Santosh Kumar Raikwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
W.P.No.13523/2013 (S.K.Raikwar Vs State of MP and otheRs.16.08.2013 Heard Shri P.N.Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 23.07.2013 as well as order of relieving issued on the same day by which the petitioner has been transferred from Bhopal to Gwalior. It is submitted that the petitioner is an office bearer of the M.P.SC/ST Union and therefore is protected from transfers in accordance with the policy of the State. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been issued only on account of the fact that the petitioner has been made a witness in a case filed by another class-4 employee against the respondent No.3 and also on account of the fact that he interfered in the posting of a class-4 employee in the house of the Secretary of the Department and therefore the impugned order being malafide, deserves to be quashed. Having heard the learned counsel for the ...
Vinod Kumar Lodhi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
1 Writ Petition No. 11757 Of 2013 16.8.2013 Shri R.S. Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. Order dated 5.4.2013 passed by District Education Officer is being assailed by the petitioner who claims himself to be the social worker and President of Parents Association, an unregistered and unrecognized body. By impugned order the District Education Officer in pursuance to the stipulations in Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 had taken recouRs. to rationalization by merging schools in various education blocks within the district with an object to bring the middle schools within the radius of three kilometres. As a result whereof at Education Block Rithi, the Girls Middle School and the Boys' Middle School Badgaon have been merged as Middle School Badgaon. No statutory provision has been commended at by the petitioner to establish t...
Binu Dhir Vs. Smt. Monica Sahagal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
R.P.No.652/2013 16/8/2013: Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Ashish Shroti, learned counsel for respondent No.1. This application has been filed for correcting certain typing error which has occurred in the order dated 19.7.2013 passed in R.P.No.222/2013. This Court while disposing of the review petition on 19.7.2013 had directed for disposal of the suit pending before the Trial Court within six months. However, inadvertently, the direction issued to the Trial Court to make endevour for the purpose of proving the documents. This is an incorrect direction because of typographical error the same is occurred. Accordingly, this application is allowed. The final order passed on 24.2.2013 in W.P.No.9229/2012 shall not be read as a direction to the trial Court to make endeavor preferably before six months to decide the suit pending before the Trial Court. The period of six months shall operate from today. With the aforesaid modification to the order passed on 19.7.2...
Raghunandan Prasad Brahaman Vs. Ramavtar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
S.A.No.2114 o16. 08.2013 Shri S. Kochar, learned counsel for the appellants. None for respondent Nos.1 to 17. Shri Santosh Yadav, learned PL for respondent No.18. In the absence of counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 17 in order to extend one more opportunity to the respondents' counsel, the case is adjourned with a direction to place it under the same head in the third week of September 2013. As an interim measure, parties of this appeal are directed not to transfer, alienate or create any third party interest with respect of the disputed property and maintain the status quo with respect of the nature of the same till next hearing of this appeal. C c as per rules. ( U.C.Maheshwari ) Judge bks...
Sardar Singh Patel Vs. Rao Rituraj Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
Sardar Singh Patel & Ors. Vs. Roa Rituraj Singh M.A.No.3093/2010 16/08/2013 In pursuance to the order passed on the last date, all the persons concerned namely the child Tanishka Patel and the appellants are present. Respondents Rao Rituraj Singh is also present along with his parents and wife Smt. Usha Singh. This Court directed them to the chamber of Smt. Giribala Singh, Registrar J-1 and requested Smt. Giribala Singh to interact with the parties, permit the parties to interact with each other, particularly the child with her father, non-appellant and all other concerned. After conducting the process for the entire day, Smt. Giribala Singh, Registrar J-1 has submitted a report to this Court, wherein it is indicated that after detailed deliberations, the parties have agreed to resolve their differences in the terms indicated in the report submitted by Smt. Giribala Singh. The terms reads as under :1. For the present the child Tanishka shall reside with her Maternal Uncle Shri Yogendra...
Mohan Vs. Ram Das
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
1 W.P. No.16014/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Writ Petition No.16014 / 2012 PETITIONERS :1. Mohan S/o. Govinda Lodhi R/o. Village Bandha, Tehsil Ghuwara, District Chhatarpur (M.P.) 2. Lad Kunwar W/o. Khanju Lodhi, R/o. Village Bandha, Tehsil Ghuwara, District Chhatarpur (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENTS:1. Ram Das, S/o. Mathura Lodhi, 2. a. Shantibai Wd/o Ramlal b.Balchand S/o. Ramlal c.Rampal S/o. Ramlal d.Meerabai d/o. Ramlal e.Mamtabair d/o Ramlal 3. Mansukha S/o. Himmat Lodhi 4. Hardas, S/o. Himmat Lodhi, 5. Imratlal S/o. Param Lodhi 6. Bahadur, S/o. Param Lodhi, 7. Shivraj S/o. Imrat Lodhi, 8. Mahendra S/o. Bahadur Lodhi, All R/o. Village Bandha, Tehsil Ghuwara, District Chhatarpur (M.P.) 2 W.P. No.16014/2012 9. State of Madhya Pradesh through Collector District Chhatarpur --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioners by Shri Ajay Kumar Jain, Advocate. Res...
R.C. Saxena and Company Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
Arbitration Case No ::33. / 2012 R.C.Saxena & Company versus Union of India 16.08.2013. Shri Shekhar Sharma for the applicant. Shri Govind Patel for the non-applicant. Applicant was granted a contract for construction of Maternity Ward, Labour Room, Operation Theatre and certain other items in a 50 Bedded Hospital to be constructed by the authorities of West Central Railway, Jabalpur. In the execution of the contract as certain disputes arose and as there was an arbitration clause and when arbitrator was not being appointed, it seems that the applicant filed a Writ Petition being W.P.No.4035/2007. However, the writ petition was withdrawn on 18.4.2012, with a liberty to initiate proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Shri Shekhar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant, invites my attention the work-order issued to the applicant on 26.10.2004, the dispute that arose between the parties and the fact that when the dispute arose the arbitral Tribunal so constituted was p...
Smt. Rannu Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
W.P.No.13428/2013 (Smt. Rannu Gupta ..versus State of MP and otheRs.16-08-2013 Heard Shri A.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dated 6-7-2013 passed by the respondent No.2 and the order dated 29-8-2011 passed by the respondent No.3 whereby the respondent No.5 has been appointed as Anganwadi Worker in Ward No.9, Naigarhi, Tahsil Mauganj, District Rewa, by setting asiet the order in favour of the petitioner. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the documents relating to the cancellation of ration card, Annexure P-14, dated 14-9-2007, though on record has not been considered by either of the authorities which clearly establishes the fact that the respondent No.5 is not a permanent resident of Ward No.9, Naigarhi but is in fact resident of Mangawan. It is submitted that though this Court had directed the authorities to look into all the documents, they have no...
State Pf M.P.and ors. Vs. Mohan Sugar Mills and ors
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
F.A. No.112/1991 1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR Single Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA First Appeal No.112/1991 (Date of filing of Civil Suit :11. 03.1976) APPELLANTS:1. State of Madhya Pradesh through Defendant No.4 the Collector, Hoshangabad. Defendant No.1 2. Competent Authority, M.P. Ceiling Agricultural Holdings Act, Harda. Versus RESPONDENTS 1 Mohan Sugar Mills Limited Plaintiff No.1 Registered Office, Harda. Plaintiff No.2 2. The Central Trading Company Private Ltd., Registered Office, Harda. Defendant No.2 3. Seth Vallabh Das Modi (since deceased) not by LRs:- (i) Smt. Pushpa Devi wd/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi, (ii) Krishna Das s/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi (iii) Brijesh Das s/o Seth Vallabh Das Modi All R/o 145, Garhi Pura, Harda (iv) Smt. Chandawali w/o Ramnarayan, R/o Somani Mohalla, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan (v) Yamuna Devi w/o Mahesh Kumar Dalni, R/o Agrawal Colony, 499, Jabalpur. (vi) Smt. Mridula Vyas w/o Narendra Kumar Vyas, R/o 860, Mahaveer Nagar, II Kota...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »