Madhya Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.L. Dohare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
Writ Petition No.14310/2013 (S) (S.L.Dohare.Vs..State of M.P.& othersThe Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Bhopal & otheRs.26-08-2013 Heard Shri V.D.S.Chouhan, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner who has been working as Assistant Grade-II in the office of Chief Medical and Health Officer, Balaghat, has filed this petition alleging that the respondent No.2/Collector, Balaghat, who is only competent to suspend and impose minot punishment upon the petitioner is proceeding further in the departmental enquiry against him in which he proposes to impose major penalty upon him and in such circumstances as the Collector is not competent to impose the major penalty upon the petitioner, he be prohibited from doing so. It is submitted that by notification of the State dated 1-1-2013 the Chief Medical and Health Officer has been empowered to impose major punishments. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is relying on a decisio...
Monika Singour Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
Monika Singour versus Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Jabalpur & Another Writ Petition No ::14203. 26. 08.2013. Shri S.K.Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.N.Dubey, learned counsel for respondents. Petitioner seeks admission to the B.Tech couRs.in Agricultural Engineering College, Jabalpur and it is her grievance that inspite of allotment made, a free seat reserved for a OBC category candidate in the Agricultural Engineering College at Jabalpur, even after fees was deposited, is not granted and, therefore, this writ petition is filed. Petitioner passed the 12 th class examination and appeared in the entrance examination conducted for admission to the Agricultural College in the State of Madhya Pradesh. She was a candidate who was seeking admission to B.Tech (Agricultural Engineering Course) and on the basis of her merit, in the entrance examination, it is stated that the President, Counseling Committee & Technical Education Secretariat, Bhopal permitted the peti...
Braj Lal Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
WRIT PETITION No.14539/20126. 08.2013 Shri Amit Chaturvedi, learned Counsel for the petitioneRs.The only grievance of the petitioners is that they should be given benefits of advance increments in terms of provisions of Fundamental Rule 22-D in the light that they were promoted from the post of Assistant Teacher to the post of Upper Division Teacher. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that State Administrative Tribunal has granted the said benefits in bunch of Original Applications filed before it and the order passed by the Division Bench in W.P.No.1104 of 2001 (State of M.P.versus Dayaram Patidar) decided on 04.10.2002 and also in other similar type of cases has also affirmed the said order. The respondents are required to consider the cases of the petitioners for grant of two advance increments in terms of F.R.22-D in the light of judgment passed by the Division Bench in 2002 in the case of Dayaram Patidar (supra).In view of the aforesaid submissions, the pet...
Rajendra Singh and anr. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
1 Cr.A. No.530/1994 Cr.A. No.1481/1996 Cr.R. No.585/1994 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.530/1994. Appellants 1. Rajendra Singh aged about 28 years, son of Chandan Singh.2. Virendra Singh, aged about 25 years, son of Chandan Singh Both residents of Village Muderi, Police Station Laundi, District Chattarpur (M.P.). Vs. Respondent The State of Madhya Pradesh For the appellant: Shri S.C.Datt, Senior Advocate with Shri P.Dubey, Advocate. For the respondent : Shri Amit Sharma, Government Advocate. Criminal Appeal No.1481/1996. Appellant: The State of Madhya Pradesh, through P.S. Lodhi, District Chhatarpur. Vs. Respondents 1. Foj Singh S/o Nawab Singh Thakur, aged 20 years, 2. Halke Singh alias Bhopal Singh S/o Hukum Singh aged 20 yrs, 3. Nawab Singh S/o Paltu Singh, aged 45 years.4. Roop Singh S/o Paltu Singh Thakur. 2 Cr.A. No.530/1994 Cr.A. No.1481/1996 Cr.R. No.585/1994 All are residents of Village Mudairi, Police Station Laundi, District Chattarpur (M.P.). Fo...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ram Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
Misc. Criminal Case No.2777/2012 26.8.2013 Per B.D.Rathi, J. Shri S.K.Kashyap, Government Advocate for the applicant- State. Heard on admission. This is an application for grant of leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code. for short) against the acquittal of respondent of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'the IPC').The corresponding judgment was passed by IInd Additional Session Judge, Gadarwara, in S.T.No.33/2011 on 31/12/2011. As per the prosecution story, report was lodged by Ramsingh at Police Outpost Sihora regarding death of his daughter Rekhabai in the night intervening 18th and 19th of December, 2011. On the basis of said information, morgue intimation (Ex.P/9) was recorded and after investigation, charge-sheet was filed. During investigation, it surfaced that Rekhabai was assassinated by her husband viz. the respondent herein. Learned Government Advocate submitted that the trial Court had erred in...
Smt. Gomti Sonkar Vs. Madhya Pradesh Housing Board Bhopal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
1 Writ Petition No. 3202 Of 2010 26.8.2013 Shri R.N. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.K. Samaiya, learned counsel for respondents. Being aggrieved by demand notice dated 19.2.2010; whereby the petitioner, who had booked a residential house under self financing scheme at Satyameva Jayate Complex, Jabalpur, has been called upon to deposit the sum of Rs.5,14,179/ over and above the amount of Rs.8,20,000/ paid by the petitioner. On being noticed the respondents have to state that the amount which is being demanded is towards the cost of construction incurred in construction of the residential house which being under self financing scheme has to be borne by the petitioner. During course of hearing this Court is apprised of two decisions by the different Bench of this Court, viz., Smt. Kamal Kanti Dubey v. State of M.P. and others : W.P. No. 9126/...
Rewanchal Institute of Education and Technology Vs. the State of Madhy ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
Writ Petition No ::17932. / 2011 Rewanchal Institute of Education versus State of MP and others 26.08.2013. Shri Vikram Singh for the petitioner. Shri Kumaresh Pathak, Dy. AG, for State. Shri K.K.Singh for respondent No.4. Shri Tabrej Sheikh for respondent No.5. The college in question has filed this writ petition seeking regularization of the admission granted to the students in the B.Ed CouRs.for the academic session 2007-08. The institute in question was not recognized not was granted affiliation for the year in question. The matter came up before this Court and thereafter travelled to the Supreme Court in a SLP filed and the Supreme Court, in the case of Abhudya Sanstha versus Union of India and otheRs.in Civil Appeal Nos.4305-4306/2011, has already dismissed the petition and the recognition granted to the petitioner/institute has been found to be unsustainable. In view of the order passed by the Supreme Court, not no relief can be granted to the petitioner/institute, as the recogn...
Everest Mazdoor Congress Vs. Shri Manish Sanghi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
Conc. No.1185/2012 26/8/2013: Shri S.K.Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kuldeep Bhargava, learned counsel for the respondents. Inter alia contending that orders dated 13.2.2006 passed by the Writ Court in W.P.No.883/2004 and by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.291/2006 are not being implemented, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt. Apart from the fact that the contempt application has been filed after a period of about three yeaRs.the fact remains that the Writ Court and the Writ Appellate Court have only confirmed certain orders passed by the Industrial Court in the matter of enforcing a settlement entered into between the parties in a proceeding under Section 51 of the Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960. The question is as to whether enforcement of such an award passed by the Industrial Court, the contempt application is maintainable. The Question is already considered by the Supreme Court and in the case of Modern Food...
MaharIn Bai Vs. Saktu
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
M.C.C. No.107/13 26/08/13 Shri Himanshu Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicants. This application has been filed seeking permission for extending the time limit fixed for depositing the cost of ` 500/- as ordered on 2/11/12 in M.C.C. No.952/12. It is seen that the cost of ` 500/- has been deposited on 15/01/13 as is evident from the receipt filed at page 8 of the paper book. Considering the fact that the delay in depositing the cost of ` 500/- was due to the lapse on the part of the counsel for which the applicants should not suffer, the time limit fixed for depositing the cost of ` 500/- is extended upto 15th January, 2013. With the aforesaid, this application stands allowed and disposed of. (Rajendra Menon) (Smt. Vimla Jain) Judge Judge Vy/-...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Chhaila @ Brajkishore
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
M.Cr.C.No.2778/2012 26.8.13 Per B.D.Rathi,J Shri S.K.Kashyap, Government Advocate for the applicant- State. Heard on admission. This is an application for grant of leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code. for short) against the acquittal of respondent Nos.1 to 5 namely Chhailla alias Brajkishore, Suru alias Suresh, Guddu alias Anil, Phutki and Ramrudra Shukla of the offences punishable under Sections 307 read with 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short, 'the IPC') as, well as, that of respondent Nos.1 to 4 of the offences under Sections 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act, 1959 (for short the Act.).The corresponding judgment was passed by Additional Session Judge, Pawai, District Panna in S.T.No.31/2010 on 22.12.2011. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 30.9.2009 at about 22.05 houRs.complainant Krishnakumar Sen @ Bhure informed at Police Station, Shahnagar that at 9.30 p.m, when he was returning to his home at village Deori from Ramjanki Mandir, Shahna...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »