MaharIn Bai Vs. Saktu

MaharIn Bai vs Saktu

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 26, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045392

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045392
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 26, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MaharIn Bai

Advocate Shri. Himanshu Kumar Verma

Respondent

Saktu

Excerpt

m.c.c. no.107/13 26/08/13 shri himanshu kumar verma, learned counsel for the applicants. this application has been filed seeking permission for extending the time limit fixed for depositing the cost of ` 500/- as ordered on 2/11/12 in m.c.c. no.952/12. it is seen that the cost of ` 500/- has been deposited on 15/01/13 as is evident from the receipt filed at page 8 of the paper book. considering the fact that the delay in depositing the cost of ` 500/- was due to the lapse on the part of the counsel for which the applicants should not suffer, the time limit fixed for depositing the cost of ` 500/- is extended upto 15th january, 2013. with the aforesaid, this application stands allowed and disposed of. (rajendra menon) (smt. vimla jain) judge judge vy/-

Full Judgment

M.C.C.

No.107/13 26/08/13 Shri Himanshu Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicants.

This application has been filed seeking permission for extending the time limit fixed for depositing the cost of ` 500/- as ordered on 2/11/12 in M.C.C.

No.952/12.

It is seen that the cost of ` 500/- has been deposited on 15/01/13 as is evident from the receipt filed at page 8 of the paper book.

Considering the fact that the delay in depositing the cost of ` 500/- was due to the lapse on the part of the counsel for which the applicants should not suffer, the time limit fixed for depositing the cost of ` 500/- is extended upto 15th January, 2013.

With the aforesaid, this application stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Judge Judge Vy/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties MaharIn Bai vs Saktu Same Subject Education