Madhya Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.L. Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
Cr.R.No.1661/2013. 26.8.13 As per B.D.Rathi,J Shri A.P.Shroti, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Shri Pankaj Dubey, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1- Economic Offences Wing. Heard on admission. This revision has been preferred under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code.) being aggrieved with the order dated 14/8/2013 passed by Special Judge (under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988).Bhopal in Special Case No.7/11, whereby prayer of the petitioners for obtaining certified copies of certain unsupplied documents relied upon by the prosecution, was not accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that while hearing on their application under Section 91 of the Code for supply of documents mentioned in the Challan, counsel for respondent no.1 had sought time on the ground that the same would be filed along with the supplementary challan, but when the supplementary challan was filed, he expressed his inability to supply...
Vijay Kumar Shukla Vs. Prashant Agrawal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
S.A.No.375 o26. 08.2013 None for the appellants. Shri Sankalp Kochar, learned counsel for the respondent. This case is listed today for admission and consideration of IA No.1889/06, appellants' application under Order 41, Rule 5, r/w Section 151 of CPC, so also respondent's applications, IA No.3874/10, 3875/10 and IA No.404/13, applications for early hearing of this appeal. In view of listing the matter, the IAs of early hearing do not require any further consideration, hence the same are disposed of. So far admission and consideration of IA No.1889/06 is concerned, I would like to mention here that earlier this matter was listed on 13.12.2010, on taking up the matter on such date, no one was present on behalf of the appellants to prosecute this appeal, on which for extending one more opportunity to the appellants' counsel to advance the arguments on admission by vacating the interim order dated 5.4.2006, the case was adjourned. Pursuant to that, the same is listed today. But the same ...
Smt. Koashalya Bai Vs. M.P. State Election Commission
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
1 Writ Petition No. 13828 Of 2013 26.8.2013 Shri B.K. Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner. Besides challenging the election dated 16.1.2013; whereby, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Sodarpur has been elected in a bye election, the petitioner, erstwhile Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sodarpur also questions the no confidence motion dated 10.9.2012 (Annexure P1) which led to removal of petitioner as Sarpanch. The post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Sodara, Janpad Panhayat Gyaratganj, district Raisen fell vacant because the petitioner who was elected for the said post in 2010 was later on removed in a proceeding under Section 21 (1) of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam 1993 on 10.9.2012; whereagainst the petitioner raised dispute under subsection (4) of Section 21 of 1993 Act. The dispute is pending final decision. While the matter stood thus, as the post...
Dr. Ashok Kumar Khare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
WRIT PETITION No.14230/20126. 08.2013 Shri K.C.Ghildiyal, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. Issue notices of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven days by registered A.D.Notices be made returnable in six weeks. It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that he being an employee of the Madhya Pradesh Dugdha Mahasangh, which Sangh was at the verge of closer, was sent to work in the Veterinary Department of Government of Madhya Pradesh. From the said department, the petitioner was taken on deputation to work in the D.P.I.P.not without there being any rhyme or reason, to oblige respondent No.5, by order dated 07.08.2013 the petitioner is sought to be repatriated to the parent department, which in fact is closed. This being so, it is contended that the orders dated 07.08.2013 (Annexure P-10 and P-11) are bad in law. Considering the facts as have been pointed out, for a period of six weeks the operation ...
Rewanchal Education College Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
Writ Petition No ::10978. / 2011 Rewanchal Education College versus State of MP and others 26.08.2013. Shri Vikram Singh for the petitioner. Shri Kumaresh Pathak, Dy. AG, for State. Shri V. Mishra for respondents 2 and 3. Shri K.K.Singh for respondent No.4. The college in question has filed this writ petition seeking regularization of the admission granted to the students in the B.Ed CouRs.for the academic session 2007-08. The institute in question was not recognized not was granted affiliation for the year in question. The matter came up before this Court and thereafter travelled to the Supreme Court in a SLP filed and the Supreme Court in the case of Abhudya Sanstha versus Union of India and otheRs.in Civil Appeal Nos.4305-4306/2011, has already dismissed the petition and the recognition granted to the petitioner/institute has been found to be unsustainable. In view of the order passed by the Supreme Court, not no relief can be granted to the petitioner/institute, as the recognition ...
J.P. Varma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
W.P.No.14357/2013 J. P. Verma vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 26.08.2013 Heard Shri V.D.S. Chouhan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 5.8.2013 by which it has been ordered that the additional charge of Principal of Government High School, Bahgarh which had previously been given to the petitioner, be given to Shri Ram Kripal Pandey, Upper Division Teacher. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Shri Ram Kripal Pandey is only an Upper Division Teacher whereas the petitioner is a Head Master of Middle School and, therefore, the charge of the post cannot be handed over to a Upper Division Teacher after taking it away from the petitioner. It is submitted that on this count the impugned order dated 5.8.2013 deserves to be quashed. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the substantiative post of the petitioner, as st...
Narayan Paul Vs. M/S Trivedi Brothers
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
C.R No.165 o26. 8.2013 Shri Rakesh Sagar, learned counsel for the applicant. Smt. S.P.Mahawar, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard on I.A.No.5966/07, applicants application for grant of stay against operation and execution of the impugned judgment and decree of the Ist Appellate Court. By referring the original receipt of deposited sum with the trial Court in compliance of the interim order of this Court dated 28.9.2007, applicants counsel submits that in compliance of such order, he has deposited the principle sum of the impugned decree by receipt No.8, Book No.18621. He is directed to submit the photo copy of the same on record after supplying its copy to the respondents within 7 days from today. Keeping in view the bonafide of the applicant that he has deposited the aforesaid amount of Rs.9,380/- within 30 days from the aforesaid interim order of this Court, but it is apparent fact that the entire decreetal sum in compliance of such interim order has not been deposited till to...
President,anantpur Grih Nir.Sah.Sam.Mary Vs. Smt.Jayanti Devi Chourasi ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
C.R No.318 o26. 8.2013 Shri Y.P.Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Dharmendra Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. None for the respondent no.2 although served. Shri Ashok Chourasia, learned Govt. Adv.for the respondent no.3. In the available circumstances of the case the respondent no.2 being one of the defendants along with the applicants before the trial Court and did not challenge the impugned order hence, her presence is not required to adjudicate this revision. Consequently, the notice against the respondent no.2, if the same has not been served, is hereby dispensed with. Although this matter is listed today for consideration of I.A.No.11322/07, an application for grant of stay against further proceedings of Civil Original Suit No.78-A/06, pending in the Court of Ist Civil Judge Class-I Rewa, but in the available scenario of the case instead to hear the matter on the aforesaid I.A., taking into consideration that this revision is pending for adjudication...
Primary Agricultre Credit Cooperative So Vs. the State of Madhya Prade ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
w.p.4298.08 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K.Shrivastava Writ Petition No.4298 of 2008 PETITIONERs.1. Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society Ltd., Shiyaoni,Block Palera, Tehsil Palera, District Tikamgarh, through its Manager Munna Lal Vishwakarma, S/o Shri Bharoseram R/o Siyaoni, Block Palera Tah. Palera, District Tikamgarh (M.P.) 2. Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society, Mohebachakra -3, Block Palera, Tah. Palera Distt.Tikamgarh, through its Manager Vinot Kumar Tiwari, R/o Kudhar Tahsil Niwari, District Tikamgarh (M.P.) 3. Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society Ltd., Jatara Block Jatara, Tehsil Jatara, District Tikamgarh, through its Manager Ayub Ali S/o Cherag Ali, R/o Jatara Block Jatara, District Tikamgarh (M.P.) 4. Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society Ltd., Chandera Block Jatara, Tah. Jatara Dist. Tikamgarh, through its Manager Ramesh Kumar Kushwaha S/o Sh. Udai Kushwaha, R/o Paitpura, Tah. Jatara Distt....
Sheikh Zahoor Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
1 Writ Petition No. 7692 Of 2012 26.8.2013 Shri Ashok Pali, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5. Shri V.S. Shroti, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Vikram Johri, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 6. Heard. Petitioner, a Fruit and Vegetable Vendor vacated the Chabutara at Sabji Mandi, Nehru Ward, owned by respondent No. 3, Municipal Council Piparia, to facilitate the respondent Council to construct shops and Chabutaras in the alternate place provided by the State Government has approached this Court vide this petition with a direction to respondents to provide early re allotment of Chabutara being constructed by respondent No. 3. On being noticed respondent Nos. 3 and 6 have filed their return stating therein that in pursuance to decision taken to shift and rehabilitate Fruit and Vegetable Vendors at a Nuzul Land ...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »