Dr. Ashok Kumar Khare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Dr. Ashok Kumar Khare vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 26, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045341

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045341
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 26, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. Ashok Kumar Khare

Advocate Shri. K.C.Ghildiyal

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.14230/201”26. 08.2013 shri k.c.ghildiyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. heard on the question of admission. issue notices of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven days by registered a.d.notices be made returnable in six weeks. it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he being an employee of the madhya pradesh dugdha mahasangh, which sangh was at the verge of closer, was sent to work in the veterinary department of government of madhya pradesh. from the said department, the petitioner was taken on deputation to work in the d.p.i.p.not without there being any rhyme or reason, to oblige respondent no.5, by order dated 07.08.2013 the petitioner is sought to be repatriated to the parent department, which in fact is closed. this being so, it is contended that the orders dated 07.08.2013 (annexure p-10 and p-11) are bad in law. considering the facts as have been pointed out, for a period of six weeks the operation of the impugned orders dated 07.08.2013 (annexure p-10 & p-11).so far they relate to the petitioner and respondent no.5, shall remain in abeyance. list immediately after six weeks. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

WRIT PETITION No.14230/201”

26. 08.2013 Shri K.C.Ghildiyal, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

Heard on the question of admission.

Issue notices of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven days by registered A.D.Notices be made returnable in six weeks.

It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that he being an employee of the Madhya Pradesh Dugdha Mahasangh, which Sangh was at the verge of closer, was sent to work in the Veterinary Department of Government of Madhya Pradesh.

From the said department, the petitioner was taken on deputation to work in the D.P.I.P.not without there being any rhyme or reason, to oblige respondent No.5, by order dated 07.08.2013 the petitioner is sought to be repatriated to the parent department, which in fact is closed.

This being so, it is contended that the orders dated 07.08.2013 (Annexure P-10 and P-11) are bad in law.

Considering the facts as have been pointed out, for a period of six weeks the operation of the impugned orders dated 07.08.2013 (Annexure P-10 & P-11).so far they relate to the petitioner and respondent No.5, shall remain in abeyance.

List immediately after six weeks.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Dr. Ashok Kumar Khare vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition