Madhya Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jawaharlal Yadav @ Chunkaman Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
[1].Criminal Appeal No.1605/2007 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.1605/2007 Jawaharlal Yadav @ Chunkaman and another versus State of M.P.As Per : G.S.Solanki, J. Shri Satish Chaturvedi, Advocate for the appellants. Shri R.N.Yadav, PL for the State. JUDGMENT [18.7.2013].1) This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C.being aggrieved by conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Sehore vide order dated 18.7.2007 passed in Special Case No.43/2006 whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 294, 353, 509 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and sentenced to S.I.for 1 month and fine of Rs.100/-, R.I.for 1 year and fine of Rs.500/-, S.I.for 1 year and fine of Rs.500/-, R.I.for 6 months and fine of Rs.1000/-, with default stipulations.2) The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that complainant Butan S...
Kiran Vs. Vinod Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
F.A.No.149/1997 18/7/2013: None appears for the parties. This is an appeal filed by the appellant-wife challenging the judgment and decree dated 27.9.96 passed by the IVth Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No.149-A/90 allowing the application filed by the respondent-husband and directing for dissolution of the marriage. As seen from the records, the appeal was filed on 1.3.1997, it was admitted on 4.4.97 and since then none is appearing for the parties. When the case is called up today, again none is present. As the case is pending for more than 15 yeaRs.we have gone through the records and are deciding the matter based on the material available on record. Appellant and respondent were married on 10.3.1987 at Jabalpur. According to the respondent-husband, immediately after the marriage within a period of two or three months, appellant went to her house and started staying with her parents. It is stated by the respondent-husband that the appellant w...
Jay Pee Rewa Cement Ltd. Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
1 W.P. No.27874/2003 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Writ Petition No.27874 / 2003 PETITIONER : Jay Pee Rewa Cement Ltd. Post Jay Pee Nagar, Tehsil Huzur, District Rewa (M.P.) Versus RESPONDENTS:1. State of Madhya Pradesh through District Registrar, Gwalior (M.P.) 2. The Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh Gwalior.3. The Collector of Stamps cum District Registrar 4. Sub Registrar Rewa Tehsil Huzur, District Rewa --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner by Shri R.S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate with Shri K.K. Gautam, Advocate. Respondents by Shri R.D. Jain, Advocate General with Shri Vivek Agrawal, Government Advocate for respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (18.07.2013) The order passed in this petition shall also govern the disposal of connected W.P. No.27875/2003, 27876/2003, 27877/2003, 2787...
Detamal Daswani Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
1 W.P. 2412/2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No.2412 of 2001 SINGLE BENCH: JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA Petitioner : Detamal Daswani S/o Shri Tharumal Daswani, R/o Gurunanak Ward, Shridham, (Gotegaon) District Narsinghpur. -Versus- RespondentS:1. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Railway Affairs, New Delhi 2. Chief Engineer, Central Railway, Bombay 3. Divisional Engineer, Central Railway, Jabalpur (M.P.) 4. Divisional Railway Manager, (Works), Central Railway, Jabalpur (M.P.) 5. Divisional Accountant, Central Railway, Jabalpur (M.P.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioner by - Shri Radhelal Gupta and Shri S.K. Garg, Advocate. Respondents by - None ORDER ( 18/07/2013) By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:- 2 W.P. 2412/2001 (i) It is, therefore, prayed that the respondents be directed not to d...
Smt.Neema Bai Vs. Ram Bai and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON. SHRI JUSTICE G.S. SOLANKI Criminal Appeal No.1578/1997 Smt. Neema bai Vs. Ram Bai and another None for the appellant. None for respondent No.1. Shri R.N. Yadav, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.2/State. JUDGMENT (18.07.2013) Appellant/complainant has preferred this criminal appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment dated 25.07.1995 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mandla in Criminal Case No.865/1994, whereby respondent Rambai has been acquitted for the offence under Section 500 I.P.C.2. The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that on 13.08.1990, respondent Rambai alongwith Sunwa and Battu have abused appellant/complainant Neembai and made allegations against her and her mother that they have involved in witchcrafting and thereby Rambai suffering long illness. She further alleged that she lodged a complaint at Police Station Mandla, but police authorities ha...
Ram Singh Gailot Vs. Phool Kunwar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
F.A.No.155/97 18/7/2013: Even though Shri Dinesh Agrawal, learned counsel appears for appellant-husband but he pleads no instructions in the matter. Shri Rahul Choubey, learned counsel for respondent- wife. Challenge in this appeal is made to a judgment and decree dated 14.2.1997 passed by the FiRs.Additional District Judge, Sehore in Civil Suit No.6A/94 by which allowing an application filed by the respondent-wife, the marriage in question has been dissolved. Records indicate that the decree for dissolution of marriage was passed on 14.2.97, there is no stay in the matter and as there is no instructions on behalf of the appellant to the counsel, prima facie we see that no interference into the matter not after a period of more than 15 years is called for and the decree has already attained finality and with the passage of time entire scenario would have been changed. Keeping in view the aforesaid, finding no case for interference, this appeal is disposed of. Original record be sent ba...
Onkarnath Vs. Sushila
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR FiRs.Appeal No :64. of 1997 Onkar Nath - V/s - Sushila Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. Honble Shri Justice A.K.Sharma. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Aditya Adhikari with Shri Abhishek Gulati, Counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether approved for reporting: Yes / No.JUDGMENT 18/07/2013 Challenge in this appeal under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is made to the judgment and decree-dated 19.12.1996, passed by the 5th Additional District Judge, Rewa in Civil Suit No.8-A/1995. By the aforesaid judgment and decree, a suit filed by the appellant/husband for dissolution of the marriage under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, has been dismissed. 2- Parties herein were married in the year 1980 and it is the case of the appellant that ever since the marriage,...
Kallu @ Rameshwar and ors. Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HON. SHRI JUSTICE G.S. SOLANKI Criminal Appeal No.647/1996 Kallu @ Rameshwar and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Shri H.S. Dubey with Shri Abhinav Dubey, Advocates for the appellants. Shri R.N. Yadav, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. JUDGMENT (18.07.2013) Appellants have preferred this criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment dated 27.03.1996 passed by Special Judge, Sehore in Special Case No.233/1994, whereby the appellants have been convicted under Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced to R.I. for 6 months with fine of Rs.500/- each, in default of payment of fine, S.I. for one month. 2.. The facts, in short, giving rise to this appeal are that complainant Shivcharan belongs to Scheduled Caste community and appellants belong to non-Scheduled Caste community. As per prosecution on 18.02...
Ramkalesh Singh Vs. M.P. Purva Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.14414/2011(S) Ramkalesh Singh & another. Vs M.P.Purva Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co.and otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri Rajneesh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Mukesh Agrawal and Shri P.N.Verma, learned counsel for respondents. ORDER (17.7.2013) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order by which it is informed to the petitioners that the revision of pay cannot be done with effect from 1.1.2006 in view of the revised pay scale since the petitioneRs.option was not made within the time stipulated under the Scheme. It is informed to the petitioner that since the option is given beyond the time limit prescribed in the Scheme, the change in the option cannot be allowed. 2: Briefly stated facts are that the petitioners two in number are the employees of the respondent No.1. The pay revision was done by the State Government by making M.P.Revision of Pa...
R.D.Gardi Medical College Vs. Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
Writ Petition No ::14395. / 2007 R.D.Gardi Medical College versus The Admission & Fee Regulatory Comm & anr. 17.07.2013. Shri Ashok Lalwani, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kamlesh Dwivedi, counsel for respondent No.1. None appears for respondent No.2, even after notice. The matter is pending since 2007. Challenge in this writ petition is made to order-dated 25.8.2007 Annexure P/8, passed by Government of MP through its Fees Regulatory Committee for Professional Institutes, Bhopal. By the impugned order respondent No.2 Shri Sumeet Kumar, was directed to be granted admission in petitioners institute. Challenge to the said order is made on various grounds and it is stated in the writ petition that respondent No.1/authority is not empowered to pass any such direction for grant of admission. During the couRs.of hearing of this writ petition, it not transpires that this petition was filed in the year 2007, the student respondent No.2 was never admitted to the couRs.in question, as he di...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »