Ram Singh Gailot Vs. Phool Kunwar

Ram Singh Gailot vs Phool Kunwar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 18, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1050239

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1050239
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 18, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Singh Gailot

Respondent

Phool Kunwar

Advocate Shri. Rahul Choubey

Excerpt

f.a.no.155/97 18/7/2013: even though shri dinesh agrawal, learned counsel appears for appellant-husband but he pleads no instructions in the matter. shri rahul choubey, learned counsel for respondent- wife. challenge in this appeal is made to a judgment and decree dated 14.2.1997 passed by the firs.additional district judge, sehore in civil suit no.6a/94 by which allowing an application filed by the respondent-wife, the marriage in question has been dissolved. records indicate that the decree for dissolution of marriage was passed on 14.2.97, there is no stay in the matter and as there is no instructions on behalf of the appellant to the counsel, prima facie we see that no interference into the matter not after a period of more than 15 years is called for and the decree has already attained finality and with the passage of time entire scenario would have been changed. keeping in view the aforesaid, finding no case for interference, this appeal is disposed of. original record be sent back. (rajendra menon) (a.k.sharma) judge judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

F.A.No.155/97 18/7/2013: Even though Shri Dinesh Agrawal, learned counsel appears for appellant-husband but he pleads no instructions in the matter.

Shri Rahul Choubey, learned counsel for respondent- wife.

Challenge in this appeal is made to a judgment and decree dated 14.2.1997 passed by the FiRs.Additional District Judge, Sehore in Civil Suit No.6A/94 by which allowing an application filed by the respondent-wife, the marriage in question has been dissolved.

Records indicate that the decree for dissolution of marriage was passed on 14.2.97, there is no stay in the matter and as there is no instructions on behalf of the appellant to the counsel, prima facie we see that no interference into the matter not after a period of more than 15 years is called for and the decree has already attained finality and with the passage of time entire scenario would have been changed.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, finding no case for interference, this appeal is disposed of.

Original record be sent back.

(Rajendra Menon) (A.K.Sharma) Judge Judge mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Ram Singh Gailot vs Phool Kunwar Same Subject Education