Madhya Pradesh Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Oriental Insurance Com.Ltd Vs. Smt. Gayatri Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
R.P.No.464/2013 26/06/2013 Shri Shailendra Samaia, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Pramod Thakre, learned counsel for the Respondent/Claimant. Shri Rakesh Jain, learned counsel for the Insurance Company. Pointing out certain calculation mistake committed in the order passed by a bench of this Court on 5th of March, 2013 in M.A.No.1485/2011, this application has been filed for modification of the order dated 5.3.2013. By inviting our attention to the award passed by the tribunal and the calculation that has been made in the award, Shri Shailendra Samaiya points out that in Para-8 of the order passed by the learned appellate court in M.A.No.1485/2011 after enhancing the compensation, the total compensation has been fixed at `2,23,750/- and after fixing the liability to the Insurance Company to `1 Lac, it is indicated that `2,33,750/- shall be paid to Respondent Nos.1 to 3. It is pointed out that the amount payable to Respondent Nos.1 to 3 is `2,23,750/- and No.`2,33,750 as indica...
The State of M.P. Vs. Baba @ Dev Bahadur and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
Cr.A. No.399/1998 Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.399 OF 199.APPELLANT : The State of Madhya Pradesh through Police Station Gadwa, District Sidhi (MP) Versus RESPONDENTS:1. Baba @ Dev Bahadur Singh, S/o Tulsi Singh, aged 25 years, 2. Chhote @ Jagat Bahadur Singh, S/o Tulsi Singh, aged 23 years, 3. Munna @ Indrajit Singh, S/o Tulsi Singh, aged 20 years, All R/o Village Machi, Police Station Gadwa, District Sidhi (MP) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellant /S tate: Ms. Savita Choudhary, Panel Lawyer For the Respondent : Shri Abdesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing :10.05.2013 Date of judgment :26. 06.2013 (JUDGMENT) This appeal is filed by the State, challenging the judgment dated 27.05.1996 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class Deosar, District Sidhi in ...
Smt. Bhawna Malgam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
W.P.No.10641/2013 (Smt. Bhawna Malgam..Vs..State of M.P.and otheRs.26-06-2013 Heard Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dated 11-6-2013 by which she has been transferred from Sub Tahsil, Damua to Tahsil Junnardeo, District Chhindweara, as Naib Tahsildar. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner had been posted at Sub Tahsil, Damua, District Chhindweara. On 7-6-2011 and thereafter she lost her husband on 18-9-2012. It is stated that being a widow she is required to took after her two small children who are studying in class IV and VI as they have already taken admission in the local school and, therefore, she needs time to adjust after the death of her husband. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed a representation (Annexure P-9) before the compet...
Smt. Mamta Bhargava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
W.P.No.18165 o25. 06.2013 Shri Anil Khare, Sr.Adv assisted by MRS.Namrata Kesharwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.1. This petition is preferred on behalf of the petitioner under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing appropriate writ to quash the note sheet dated 13.10.2010, (Ann. P-10) drawn up by respondent No.1 with a further prayer for appropriate direction to such respondent to decide her pending application dated 5.10.1990 in terms of order dated 23.8.2010, (Ann. P-3) passed by the Central Government taking into account the provision of Section 11 (2) of the M.M.R.D.Act 1957 and this case is listed today for consideration of IA No.7091/13, petitioner's application for disposal of the petition in view of the averments of IA No.9605/11 filed on behalf of respondents on 29.7.2011 with a prayer for dismissal of this petition as infructuous. Having heard on aforesaid IA, keeping in view th...
Anand Kumar Rajak Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Agriculture Marketing Board
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
W.P.No.10438/2013 Anand Kumar Rajak vs. M. P. State Agriculture Marketing Board & ORS.1 26.06.2013 Heard Shri P.K.Asati, learned counsel or the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner, who is working on the post of Assistant Sub Inspector, has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 20.5.2013 by which he has been transferred from Palera, District Tikamgarh to Jabera, District Damoh. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that previously the petitioner had been transferred from Chhatarpur to Tikamgarh by order dated 27.5.2011 and, thereafter, again by order dated 22.10.2012 he has been transferred from Tikamgarh to Palera and thereafter to Damoh and, therefore, the petitioner is being subjected to frequent transfer in the mid session which is contrary to the policy of the respondents. A Division Bench of this Court in R.S.Chaudhary versus State of M.P.and OtheRs.ILR [2007].MP 1329.has already held that in case transfer i...
Tulsidas Vs. Hemant Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
Writ Petition No.9412/13 26.6.2013 None for the petitioner. He is heard on the question of admission. Having perused this petition, the same is preferred by the petitioner/defendant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for appropriate direction to the Court of Ist Civil Judge Class-I Harda, to take an endeavour to expedite the hearing on the application of the respondents filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of CPC (Annexure-P-2) and conclude the same within 15 days with a further prayer to direct such Court to conclude the suit also within the period three months. It is apparent that suit filed only in the year 2012 so, at this stage, no direction to conclude the suit finally within three months could be given by this Court. However, considering the available facts and circumstances according to which, after passing some exparte order of status-quo on the aforesaid application of respondents vide dated 7.5.2012, the same was extended on various dates and in last near about one y...
Maa Sharda Industrial Training Centre Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
1 W.P.No.11184/12 26/06/13 Shri Anil Khare, learned Sr.counsel with Shri H.S.Chhabra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.P.Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. In pursuance to the order passed on 18/06/13, Shri Anil Khare has filed the additional affidavit and documents. Petitioner/society is running an institute namely the Maa Sharda Industrial Training Centre, Maihar and has filed this writ petition aggrieved by the action of the respondents in the matter of granting permission/affiliation for starting certain couRs.in various trade in their institute and have prayed for quashing the orders Annexures P-6 and P-9 by which permission to establish certain shifts and trades have been rejected. Facts in nutshell goes to show that in pursuance to a resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the society on 25/01/12, it was decided to start certain couRs.of study in various technical trades in the institute, consisting of six units of Electrician trade, three units of fitter ...
Annapurna Mahila Swa Sahayata Samooh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
1 W.P. No. 10344 Of 2013 26.6.2013 Shri Rahul Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard. Order dated 1.6.2013 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Rewa Division, Rewa is being assailed. Vide impugned order, the Appellate Authority while affirming the order dated 8.11.2012 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sihawal, District Sidhi of allotting the work of distribution of Midday meal in middle school Sudwar in favour of Kalpana Mahila Seva Sahayata Samooh has dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner against said order. Case of the petitioner is that the work of distribution of Midday meal in two schools i.e. Primary school Sudwar and Middle school Sudwar was satisfactorily being carried out by the petitioner Selfhelp group since 2009 under the scheme floated by the State Government through Integrated Child Development Project of providing ...
Kamta Prasad Biyar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
Writ Petition No.9550/13 26.6.2013 Shri Mahesh Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. He is heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dated 26.3.2013 (Annexure-P-10) passed in case No.11/A-74/12-13, whereby, complying the order of this Court dated 13.9.2012, passed in writ petition No.13861/12, the representation of the petitioner was considered and decided by holding that the petitioner could not prove his title over the property by any admissible documents. Initially the case was argued at length, but in response of some query of the Court that in the lack of document of title how the Collector could have considered the case of the petitioner as stated in the petition, in any case, the title dispute could not be decided under the writ jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India because it requires evidence which could not recorded in the present matter, instead to argue further, counsel seeks permissio...
Tapas Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
W.P.No.10920/2013 26/6/2013: Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Petitioners are students who have been admitted to a faculty of Engineering CouRs.in the Government Engineering College at Rewa. It is their contention that the State Government has issued a Circular as contained in Annexure P/6 and P/7 granting exemption from payment of tuition fees to children of employees working in the State Government who are Green Card holdeRs.Inter alia contending that parents of the petitioners are Green Card holders and in accordance to the policies and circulars of the State Government, petitioners are entitled to exemption from payment of Tuition fees, certain representations made by the petitioners for refund of tuition fees but as the same has not been considered, the petitioners have filed this writ petition. As the claim of the petitioners are yet to be adjudicated by the competent authority and a decision ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »