Madhya Pradesh Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dinesh Awasthy Vs. Madhya Rpadesh Sanskrit Board Bhopal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
W.P.No.7636/2008 Dinesh Awasthy vs Madhya Pradesh Sanskrit Board 14/05/2013 None is present for the petitioner even when the matter is called in second round. Shri Abhijeet Bhomik, Advocate for the respondent Board. Shri Lalit Joglekar, Panel Lawyer for the State. This petition is for seeking direction to allow the students of the petitioner's institution to appear in the 10th and 12th Examination conducted by the M.P.Sanskrit Board, which was to commence from 28th of June, 2008. Almost five years have been elapsed. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and due to passage of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is dismissed accordingly. (Subhash Kakade) Judge SJ/-...
Machal Kumar Patel Vs. Praveen Krishna
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
Conc. No.1730 / 2012 (Machal Kumar Patel v. Praveen Krishna & otheRs.14-05-2013 Shri Anuj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anshul Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents. The petitioner has filed this application alleging disobedience and contempt of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.3275/2009, dated 29-6-2012. The respondents have filed a return and stated that the case of the petitioner has been considered in the light of the order passed by this Court and rejected by order dated 23-8-2012, a copy of which has been filed alongwith the return as Annexure R-3. In view of the aforesaid I do find no reason to initiate any contempt proceedings against the respondents. The application for contempt filed by the petitioner being meritless is accordingly dismissed and the rule nisi issued against the respondents stands discharged. ( R.S.Jha ) Judge mct...
Digambar Pagare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
Digamber Pagare versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No :11049. / 2008 (s) 14.05.2013. Shri A.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State. Shri Rohit Jain, learned counsel for respondent No.5. In view of order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2776/2009(s) (S.S.Mishra & ORS.versus State of M.P.& Ors.) decided on 26.4.2011, this petition is also allowed. Impugned order Annexure P-5 is quashed and the State Government is directed to take action in accordance to directions already issued in para 11 of the order passed by this Court on 26.4.2011 in W.P.No.2776/2009(s) and other cases. With the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed and disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE ss/-...
Jitendra Chouhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
WA No.1003 of 2012 WA No.1004 of 2012 WA No.1015 of 2012 WA No.1016 of 2012 WA No.1017 of 2012 WA No.1018 of 2012 WA No.1019 of 2012 WA No.1028 of 2012 WA No.1029 of 2012 WA No.1030 of 2012 WA No.1038 of 2012 WA No.1039 of 2012 WA No.1040 o14. 5.2013. Shri A.M.Trivedi, Sr.cousnel with Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra for the appellants. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari for the respondents. This batch of appeals is arising out of common order dt.17.7.2012 passed by the writ court in WP No.5437/2006(S).WP No.11282/2006(S).WP No.13804/2005(S).WP No.15488/2005(S).WP No.15489/2005(S).WP No.15493/2005(S).WP No.15494/2005(S).WP No.15495/2005(S).WP NO.15496/2005(S) WP No.15498/2005(S).WP No.15500/2005(S).WP No.6626/2006(S).WP No.6627/2006(S).WP No.6628/2006(S) and WP No.7150/2006(S).The learned single Judge has found that the cancellation of the selection process for the post of Jail Warden, Central Jail, Rewa was fully justified as there were serious illegalities and regularities in the selection and while ...
Shiv Kumar Vishvakarma Vs. Shri Shiv Narayan Rupla
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
C.P.No.1854/12 14.05.2013 Shri Brijendra Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard. This contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 02.07.2012 in W.P.No.6392/12. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the respondent has complied with the order passed by this court, therefore, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present application which may be disposed of with liberty to the applicant to take up the proceedings against the order passed by the respondent. In view of the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the applicant, the application is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Dinesh Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
Dinesh Patel versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No :16506. / 2012 (s) 14.05.2013. Shri Sunil Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State. From the return filed by respondents, it is clear that as per seniority maintained in the matter of regularization of skilled labourer petitioner's chance/seniority has not come. It is indicated that as and when petitioner attains seniority, his case shall be considered. In view of above, respondents to consider the case of petitioner as per seniority. In case claim of petitioner is not considered as per seniority, petitioner is granted liberty to assail the action afresh in accordance to law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE ss/-...
Kalidas Smriti Sankrit Ucch.Mad.Vid.DuA. Vs. the State of Madhya Prade ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
W.P.No.6452/2008 Kalidas Smriti Sanskrit Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya vs State of M.P.and others 14/05/2013 Shri Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Abhijeet Bhomik, Advocate for the respondent Board. Shri Lalit Joglekar, Panel Lawyer for the State. The petitioner's school was affiliated with the respondent No.2 - Board for a period of three yeaRs.After expiry of period of three yeaRs.the petitioner was directed to apply for renewal of the recognition. There were 837 students in the petitioner's institution. The petitioner applied for renewal of affiliation and also completed all the formalities. Thereafter, the committee also inspected the petitioner's institution, however, respondent No.2 had not taken any steps, therefore, this writ petition in the nature of mandamus. Almost five years have been elapsed. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and due to passage of time, this writ petition has become infructuous, therefore, dismissed accordingly. (...
Ashok Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
1 Cr. R. No.1628/2005 HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR BEFORE : TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL. J.CRIMINAL REVISION NO.1628 OF 2005.Petitioners :1. Ashok Kumar S/o Ramlal Pawar, aged about 29 years, Agriculturist, 2. Shishupal Alias Sushil Kumar, S/o Radhe Lal Pawar aged 22 years. Both residents of Gram Tutera, P. S. Ugali Tehsil Keolari, District Seoni. Versus. . Respondents : State of M. P. Through P. S. Ugli, District Seoni. For the petitioner : Shri Manot Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the respondent : Smt. Pratibha Mishra P. L. ORDER (Passed on 14.5.2013) 1. This Criminal Revision is preferred against the judgment dated 21.10.2003 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Seoni in Criminal Appeal No.120/2004 convicting the petitioners under Section 354 IPC and sentenced to six month RI. Vide judgment dated 28.9.2004 passed in regular Criminal Case No.196/2003, JFMC Seoni. The petitioners were sentenced them to one year RI and with fine of Rs.400/-. The appellate Court has modified and re...
A.R. Choudhary Vs. Sabajet Singh Yadav
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
C.P.No.1310/2012 14.05.2013 Shri Jaideep Shirpurkar, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri B.P.Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent. The applicants have filed this contempt petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent/authority for non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court in W.P.No.4653/04 on 11.01.2012 whereby the Director Public Instructions, Bhopal was required to decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with the rules within three months. The respondent has filed a return and stated that the matter has to be decided by the council of the minister as it is a policy matter and the Joint Director Public Instructions has forwarded the matter to the council of the minister by preparing precis in that regard. In the circumstances, no case for initiating any contempt proceedings against the respondent/authority/ Joint Director Public Instructions is made out, therefore the contempt application filed by the applicant i...
Shiv Prakash Sharma Vs. Shri R.K.Swai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
C.P.No.1855/12 14.05.2013 Shri S.K.Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant. Ms.Vandana Shroti, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. This contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 13.01.2012 in W.P.No.412/2012(S).From a perusal of the return filed by the respondents, it is observed that the respondents, by order dated 12.06.2012 Annexure R/1, have considered and rejected the representation of the applicant in compliance of the order dated 13.01.2012 passed by this court in W.P.No.412/12 (S) and therefore, no case for initiating the contempt proceedings is made out against the respondents. The contempt petition filed by the applicant is dismissed. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »