Madhya Pradesh Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fukku Mehra Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
1 Cr.A. No.1476/2002 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1476/2002 APPELLANT: Fukku Mehra S/o Bhaiyalal Mehra, Aged about 28 years, Occupation Agriculturist, Resident of Village Vanawachar, P.S. Jaisingh Nagar, District Shahdol, M.P. Versus RESPONDENT: The State of Madhya Pradesh Through Police Station Jaisingh Nagar District-Shahdol, M.P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellant : Shri V.K. Lakhera, Learned Counsel For the Respondent/State: Shri Umesh Pandey, Learned Govt. Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing :18. 04.2013 Date of judgment:07. 05.2013 Per: Subhash Kakade, J.(JUDGMENT) Feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 23.08.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Beohari, District Shahdol in Sessions ...
Ram Gopal Vs. Shri Devraj Birdi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
Conc. 1237/2011 7/5/2013 Shri R.K.Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kamlesh Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondents. Considering the fact that in pursuance to the order passed on 24.6.2010 in W.P.No.13697/2006, the question of determining the social status of the petitioner was referred to High Power Committee and as is evident from Annexure R/1 the said Committee considered the claim of the petitioner and by its order dated 21.8.2012 has rejected the claim, not no further action is required to be taken in this proceeding. However, in case, petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which consideration was made by High Power Committee and claim is rejected, petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the said order of the High Power Committee afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, respondents are discharged from the proceedings and the application disposed of. (Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra...
M/S Kutch Brine Chem Industries Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
W.P.No.8815/2013 07.05.2013 Shri Siddharth Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Jaideep Singh, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.1/State. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we direct issuance of notice to respondent No.2 who is the main respondent. Petitioner to serve the respondent No.2 Hamdust. Steps by next working day. Notice be made returnable before next date of hearing. Be listed for hearing on 16th May, 2013. Till next date of hearing, subject to hearing the other side, the respondent may process the NIT for finalization of the financial bid but work order shall not be issued. C.C.today. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Subhash Kakade) Acting Chief Justice Judge snb/-...
Pappu @ Chandra Prakash Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
A.F.R. Judge HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Revision No.2109/2011 Pappu @ Chandra Pravesh Tiwari Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri S.K. Dwivedi, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on 7th day of May, 2013) The applicant has preferred the present revision against the order dated 23.11.2011 passed by the learned 4 th Additional Sessions Judge, Katni in S.T. No.152/04, whereby the application filed by the applicant under Section 233(3) of Cr.P.C. was dismissed.2. The facts of the case, in short are that, the applicant is an accused in a...
D.S.Rahatgdale Vs. Add.Chief Sect.Pradeep Bhargav
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
Conc Petition No ::191. / 2008 D.S.Rahangdale versus Additional Chief Secretary and others 07.05.2013. Shri N.S.Ruprah for the applicant. Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the non- applicants/State. In the order passed by writ Court on 15.12.2003, in W.P.No.17478/2003, the direction issued was to consider the case of the applicant/petitioner for regularization on the post of LDC and the non-applicants/respondents were further directed to consider as to from which date the regularization is to be granted. Even though not by passing an order-dated 4.2.2013, applicant has been regularized, but the date from which the said regularization is granted is not indicated in the order. Non-applicants are, therefore, directed to take action for indicating the date of regularization and after taking note of the order passed in the writ petition and the fact that the contempt application had been pending since 2008, pass appropriate orders with regard to the date from which the regularization...
Ramsingh and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
(1) Cr.A.Nos. 1480/01 & 417/04 AFR HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1480/2001 APPELLANTS:1. Rem Singh S/o Manas Singh Tadwi, Rathiya, aged 40 years, 2. Ter Singh S/o Khoom Singh Tadwi Rathiya aged 30 years, 3. Malsingh S/o Khum Singh Tadwi, Rathiya, aged 35 years, 4. Sohan S/o Rem Singh Tadwi Rathiya aged 27 years, All residents of Village Chainpura, P.S. Nepanagar Tehsil Burhanpur District Khandwa Versus RESPONDENT: State of Madhya Pradesh through P.S.Nepanagar, Tehsil Burhanpur District Khandwa (M.P.). CRIMINAL APPEAL No.417/2004 APPELLANT: Bhikla S/o Tejsingh Tarwi, aged 20 years, R/o Village Chainpura, P.S. Nepanagar, Tehsil Burhanpur District Khandwa ( M.P.). Versus RESPONDENT: State of Madhya Pradesh, through S.H.O. Nepanagar, Tehsil Burhanpur District Khandwa (M.P.). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...
Ramkesh Patel Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Revision No.260/2001 Ram Kesh Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Satish Chaturvedi, counsel for the applicant. Shri G.S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on 7th day of May, 2013) The applicant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 467 & 468 of IPC vide judgment dated 9.1.2001 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Shri Deepesh Tiwari), Beohari in criminal case no.259/90 and sentenced for two years R.I. with fine of `500/- and one year imprisonment with fine of `400/-. In criminal appeal no.15/01, th...
Bhupendra Singh Vs. Shri Keshari Prasad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
Con.C.No.1930/2012 07/05/2013 Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents/State. Prima-facie, on going through the order passed by the Respondent/Tehsildar and on a perusal of the certified copy of the documents presented by the petitioner in the office of the Tehsildar, it is seen that the affidavit and the other documents in accordance with the statutory form were submitted by the petitioner and prima-facie, a case of deliberate rejection without reconsidering properly rejection of the application on the grounds indicated in the contempt application cannot be ruled out. Shri Anshuman Singh is directed to file an affidavit along with certified copy of the documents received by him to show as to how and in what manner the affidavit and documents were filed before the Tehsildar and, thereafter, who prima-facie seems to have passed the order only to deprive the petitioner of his legitimate right. Before taki...
Nandkishore Singh Patel Samajik Avam Shiksha Samiti Vs. National Counc ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
Writ Petition No.2846/2013 7.5.2013 Shri Manot Chansoriya, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri K.K.Singh, Advocate, for respondent no.2. Shri Rahul Jain, Deputy Advocate General, for the State/ respondent nos.3 and 4. Shri Brajesh Choubey, Advocate for respondent no.5. The petitioner is an educational society. It has established Nandkishore Singh Patel Memorial Education Training Institute at Plot No.979/6, NH 69.Tikari Naka ItaRs.Road, District Betul. On 1.10.2011 it submitted an online application to the Western Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education, seeking grant of recognition/permission for Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) course. But the Western Regional Committee by order dated 12.6.2012 rejected the application on the ground that the Rajya Shiksha Kendra and School Education Department by their respective letters dated 27.1.2012 and 22.3.2012 have recommended not to grant recognition/permission for D.El.Ed. couRs.in the State of Madhya Pradesh. A D...
Ma Bhagwati Sugar Mill Limited Baktara Tah Budhni Vs. Secretary Govt. ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-07-2013
W.P.No.8800/2013 07/05/2013 Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Issue notice to the respondents on payment of P.F within one week, returnable in four weeks. Having heard Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner, it is seen that during the validity of the order passed by the Central Government with regard to supply of sugar under the Levy Sugar Supply Control Order, 1979 Annexure-P1 and in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated therein, prima-facie it seems that no demand was made to the petitioner for supply of the sugar in accordance with said order between the period from 1.7.2012 to 31.8.2012. In the absence of any demand being made, proposed action to initiate coercive steps against the petitioner including prosecution under the Essential Commodities Act, seems to be unsustainable. In view of the above, further action in pursuance to the order dated 27.4.2013 is directed to be stayed. Respondents are directed to show cause as to why, t...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »