Ram Gopal Vs. Shri Devraj Birdi

Ram Gopal vs Shri Devraj Birdi

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 07, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049486

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049486
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 07, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Gopal

Advocate Shri. R.K.Verma

Respondent

Shri Devraj Birdi

Advocate Shri. Kamlesh Dwivedi

Excerpt

conc. 1237/2011 7/5/2013 shri r.k.verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri kamlesh dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondents. considering the fact that in pursuance to the order passed on 24.6.2010 in w.p.no.13697/2006, the question of determining the social status of the petitioner was referred to high power committee and as is evident from annexure r/1 the said committee considered the claim of the petitioner and by its order dated 21.8.2012 has rejected the claim, not no further action is required to be taken in this proceeding. however, in case, petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which consideration was made by high power committee and claim is rejected, petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the said order of the high power committee afresh in accordance with law. with the aforesaid, respondents are discharged from the proceedings and the application disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

Conc.

1237/2011 7/5/2013 Shri R.K.Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Kamlesh Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondents.

Considering the fact that in pursuance to the order passed on 24.6.2010 in W.P.No.13697/2006, the question of determining the social status of the petitioner was referred to High Power Committee and as is evident from Annexure R/1 the said Committee considered the claim of the petitioner and by its order dated 21.8.2012 has rejected the claim, not no further action is required to be taken in this proceeding.

However, in case, petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which consideration was made by High Power Committee and claim is rejected, petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the said order of the High Power Committee afresh in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, respondents are discharged from the proceedings and the application disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Ram Gopal vs Shri Devraj Birdi Same Subject Education