Madhya Pradesh Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suresh Mahra Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Revision No.1532/2004 Suresh and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Narendra Nikhare, counsel for the applicants. Shri S.K. Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on 14th day of May, 2013) The applicants have preferred the present revision against the order dated 6.10.2004 passed by the learned 2 nd Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdol in Criminal Appeal No.151/2003, whereby the conviction under Section 379 of IPC was maintained and the sentence of six months R.I. was granted.2. The prosecution's case, in short is that, o...
N.R.Hariyale Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
W.P.No.11542/2012 (N.R.Hariyale versus State of MP and otheRs.14.05.2013 Shri Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State. Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 12.07.2012 by which the respondent No.3 has been transferred and posted at Hoshangabad on his own expanses in the capacity of the Principal of the Polytechnique College, Hoshangabad. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that previously on 18.05.2010 the respondent No.3 had been transferred from Government Polytechnique College, Hoshangabad to Polytechnique College, Jawad District Neemach, being aggrieved by which he approached this court by filing W.P.No.7332/10 (S) which was dismissed by order dated 20.10.2010. It is submitted that thereafter the respondent No.3 has again managed to get himself posted at Hoshangabad though there are complaints against him by the petitioner and the Collector had also recommended his t...
Pandit Brij Kishore Pateriya Sanskrit Vi Vs. the State of Madhya Prade ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
W.P.No.7660/2008 Pandit Brij Kishore Pateriya Sanskrit Vidyalaya vs State of M.P.and others 14/05/2013 None is present for the petitioner even when the matter is called in second round. Shri Abhijeet Bhomik, Advocate for the respondent Board. Shri Lalit Joglekar, Panel Lawyer for the State. This petition is for seeking direction to allow the students of the petitioner's institution to appear in the 10th and 12th Examination conducted by the M.P.Sanskrit Board, which was to commence from 28th of June, 2008. Almost five years have been elapsed. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and due to passage of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is dismissed accordingly. (Subhash Kakade) Judge SJ/-...
Atal Bihari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
WA No.1003 of 2012 WA No.1004 of 2012 WA No.1015 of 2012 WA No.1016 of 2012 WA No.1017 of 2012 WA No.1018 of 2012 WA No.1019 of 2012 WA No.1028 of 2012 WA No.1029 of 2012 WA No.1030 of 2012 WA No.1038 of 2012 WA No.1039 of 2012 WA No.1040 o14. 5.2013. Shri A.M.Trivedi, Sr.cousnel with Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra for the appellants. Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari for the respondents. This batch of appeals is arising out of common order dt.17.7.2012 passed by the writ court in WP No.5437/2006(S).WP No.11282/2006(S).WP No.13804/2005(S).WP No.15488/2005(S).WP No.15489/2005(S).WP No.15493/2005(S).WP No.15494/2005(S).WP No.15495/2005(S).WP NO.15496/2005(S) WP No.15498/2005(S).WP No.15500/2005(S).WP No.6626/2006(S).WP No.6627/2006(S).WP No.6628/2006(S) and WP No.7150/2006(S).The learned single Judge has found that the cancellation of the selection process for the post of Jail Warden, Central Jail, Rewa was fully justified as there were serious illegalities and regularities in the selection and while ...
Harisharan Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.1495/2004 Harisharan VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Anand Nayak, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 14th day of May, 2013) The applicant has preferred the present revision against the order dated 1.10.2004 passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in criminal appeal No.8/2002, whereby the conviction directed against the applicant for the offence punishable under section 325 of IPC was maintained and the applicant was sentenced with 6 months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/-.2. The prosecution's case, in short, is that, on 1.12.1992, at about 9 a.m., in the morning, the applicant assaulted the victim Bhagwandas by a ...
Natthurao Chadhokar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
Natthurao Chadhokar versus State of M.P.& Anr. Writ Petition No :16524. / 2012 (s) 14.05.2013. Shri Jitendra Arya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent/State. Considering the fact that in the light of order passed in W.P.No.3493/1995 since petitioner is only regularized from 8.6.2006, but certain other persons have been regularized from 1995, respondents to consider the claim of petitioner also in accordance to directions issued in the writ petition and decide it by a speaking order within a period of three months. With the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE ss/-...
M/S Sukhdev Prasad Patel Vs. Cheif Executive Officer
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
W.P.No.13811/2011 M/s Sukhdev Prasad Patel vs Chief Executive Officer and others 14/05/2013 Shri Sankalp Kochar Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, Panel Lawyer for the respondents State. Heard on I.A.No.6443/2013, an application for withdrawal of writ petition in view of compromise entered into between the parties. Considering the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavit of the petitioner himself, the same is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, in view of compromise entered into between the parties, with a liberty to file afresh, in future, in case dispute arises in relation to the subject matter. (Subhash Kakade) Judge SJ/-...
C.R.Pothpode Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
Writ Petition No ::2120. / 2008 C.R.Potphode versus State of MP and others 14.05.2013. Shri Rajendra Pandey for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Government Advocate, for State. In paragraph 3 of the return filed by the respondents, it is pointed out that until and unless the case sub judice before this Court being Writ Petition No.15894/2003 is not decided, claim of the petitioner cannot be adjudicated. Petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court an order-dated 3.12.2008, passed by this Court in W.P.No.15894/2003, whereby the claim has been decided. Now, as W.P.No.15894/2003 has been decided, respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P/12, in accordance to law within a period of two months after considering the order passed in W.P.No.15894/2003. With the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed and disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
Arvind Kumar Arakh Vs. Mr.Prabhanshu Kamal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
C.P.No.1856/12 14.05.2013 None for the applicant. Shri T. Sheikh, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. This contempt petition has been filed by the applicant alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 16.11.2011 in W.P.No.18517/11. In view of the return filed by the respondents, it is apparent that on account of the pendency of the proceedings before the High Power Committee, the Collector has taken a decision in the matter in compliance of the order passed by this court in W.P.No.18517/11 dated 16.11.2011. and therefore, no case for initiating the contempt proceedings is made out against the respondents. The contempt petition filed by the applicant is dismissed. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Vishnu Tiwari Vs. M.P.Sanskrit Boar5d
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-14-2013
W.P.No.7609/2008 Vishnu Tiwari vs Madhya Pradesh Sanskrit Board 14/05/2013 None is present for the petitioner even when the matter is called in second round. Shri Abhijeet Bhomik, Advocate for the respondent Board. Shri Lalit Joglekar, Panel Lawyer for the State. This petition is for seeking direction to allow the students of the petitioner's institution to appear in the 10th and 12th Examination conducted by the M.P.Sanskrit Board, which was to commence from 28th of June, 2008. Almost five years have been elapsed. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and due to passage of time, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is dismissed accordingly. (Subhash Kakade) Judge SJ/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »