Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jantu Raja @ Devendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
M.Cr.C. No.2637/2013 26.3.2013 Shri Chandrapal Singh , counsel for the applicants. Shri Puneet Shroti, PL , for the respondent/State. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.72/12 registered at Police Station Kisangarh, District Chhatarpur for offence punishable under Sections 395, 397, 212, 216 of IPC and Section 25/27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He has no criminal past. He is in jail since 1.11.12. Learned counsel further submits that initially no identification parade has been conducted by the prosecution. The same was conducted after filing the charge sheet and the applicant was identified. Trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant. Learned counsel for the State has objected the prayer for grant of bail. I have perused the case diary wher...
Veena Vadini Educational and Prashikshan Sansthan Vs. the State of Mad ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
WP 15131.12 Writ Petition N o. 15131 o26. 03/2013 Shri Praveen Chourasiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Kumaresh Pathak, learned Dy. Advocate General for the respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Mahendra Pateriya, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. Shri K.K.Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. Petitioner vide this petition seeks direction to respondent/University for conducting Special Examination of fiRs.year students of B.Ed. CouRs.of the students admitted in the petitioner/ Institution in the year 2008- 09. At the outset it is stated on behalf of the parties that the issue which has been raised in this petition as to whether students admitted in petitioner/College in the academic year 2008- 09 for B.Ed. would be entitled to take up the examination as the same has been declined for the reason that the students have directly admitted to that colleges without taking recouRs.to selection through counseling as is the mode prescribed under 3.3 of Appendix 7 of N.C.T.E...
M/S O.P. Shukla Vs. M.P. State Agricultural Board
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
W.P.NO.4957/2013 26-03-2013 Shri A.L.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Govind Patel, learned counsel for the respondents. Matter pertains to recovery of royalty for the mineral consumed by the petitioner in execution of certain contract. The question of insisting upon the payment of royalty and the question of deducting royalty from the bills on similar contract has already been considered and decided by this court in various judgments . The question of demanding royalty from a contractor with regard to mineral consumed in execution of the contract has been considered in the case of W.P.No.1361/09 (M/s Chandrama Construction Company versus M.P.Rajya Krishi Vipran Sangh & others).W.P.No.2535/2003 (M/s Ravi Construction Company Vs.State of M.P.and otheRs.and W.P.No.5266/2006 (M/s K.P.Singh Bhadoria versus M.P.Rural Road Development Authority Bhopal).Recently also a Division Bench of this court in W.P.No.16091/2010 (M/s Vinot Kumar Jain versus M.P.Rural Road Development Auth...
Rammohan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
W.P.No.6430/2007 26.03.2013 Shri Shobhitaditya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Alok Tapikar, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1. Shri Ishant Soni, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. None for the respondent No.3. Shri Piyush Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. Heard on I.A.No.4256/2013, an application for permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to join in the services at State of Chhattisgarh as per his allocation. Since the application is not opposed, the same is allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to join in the State of Chhattisgarh as per his allocation. (K.K.Trivedi) Judge b...
Jitendra @ Babla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3174/2013 26.3.2013 Shri Mahendra Choubey, counsel for the applicant. Shri Puneet Shroti, PL, for the State. Heard finally. This is second application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant is in custody since 13/1/2013 in connection with Crime No.263/2008 registered at Police Station Gopalganj, District Sagar for offence punishable under Sections8/20-B(2)(b) of NDPS Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submits that applicant was previously on bail but during trial he remained absent before the trial Court, therefore, learned trial Court has issued an arrest warrant against him. In compliance of the aforesaid warrant, he has been arrested and sent to jail. He is ready to cooperate in the investigation. Trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the contenti...
Vardhaman JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
M.Cr.C.No.5407 o26. 03.13 Shri Greeshm Jain, counsel for the applicants. Shri Vivek Lakhera, PL for respondent/State. Shri Mahendra Pateria, counsel for the complainant Smt Pooja Jain. In compliance of order dated 22.3.2013, this case is placed before me for consideration of IA No.793/13, an application on behalf of complainant for vacating the ex-parte stay granted earlier as well as for final disposal of the petition at motion stage. In the couRs.of the arguments for final disposal, applicant's counsel by referring IA No.7025/13 said that on 21.3.13, he has filed this application for amendment in the petition. The same is found with the record. With the consent of the parties, such IA is heard. On consideration, for the reasons stated in it, the same is allowed and the applicant's counsel is directed to incorporate the proposed amendment during the couRs.of the day. With permission of the court, the same is carried. Accordingly, it is certified. In further arguments, in the light of ...
Smt.Tahira Sultan Vs. Akbar Mohd.Khan and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
FA 480.05 FiRs.Appeal No.480 o26. 03/2013 Shri Manot Sanghi, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri B.M.Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents No.7, 8 & 9. I.A.No.2669/2013 an application under Order 23 Rule 1 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the appellant stating therein that during the pendency of present appeal a compromise has been entered into with brother and sisters and appellant has got share in the ancestral house and that a settlement has been arrived at in respect of agricultural land bearing survey No.277/1, 278/1, 279/1 area 6.760 hectare village Misrod Babadiya Kurd, bearing survey No.277/2 278/2 279/2 & 288/2 total area 6.760 hectare village Misrod Babadiya Kurd and bearing survey No.277/3, 279/3, 289/3 total 6.780 hectare situated at village Misrod Babadiya Kurd, tahsil Huzur, district Bhopal with subsequent purchasers viz., Bhupendra Patidar S/o Jagdish Patel, Mayank Patidarminot through Mahendra Patidar, Ram Dayal s/o ...
Santosh Baghel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
M.Cr.C.No.2618/2013 26/3/2013 Shri Manish Datt, learned Senior Advocate with Shri Nishant Datt, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. From the medical report submitted, it is seen that the applicant was produced before the Chief Medical Officer Indira Gandhi District Hospital, Seoni on 21.3.2013. After preliminary examination, he was referred to the expert for opinion, the expert examined him on the same day and found that it is an old case of Epilepsy. After medical examination, it was found that the patient is well settled but is having mild headache. However, with regard to certain problem in his vision, he is advised for futher examination at Jabalpur. The respondents to take steps for getting the applicant for further medical examination at Jabalpur and submit a report. List for further orders in the week commencing from 15th of April, 2013. A copy of the report received from the Jail Authorities be placed on record. (Raje...
Syed Ashfaq Ahmad Vs. Dr. Anjum Sultan
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
1 M.Cr. C No.8812/12 26.3.2013 Shri Ashok Lalwani, learned counsel for the applicants. Smt. Pratibha Mishra, learned P.L.for the State/respondent no.2. All the applicants/accused as well as respondent no.1/complainant Dr. Anjum Sultan, are present in person identified by the counsel of the applicants Shri Ashok Lalwani. This case is listed today for admission, but I am apprised by the applicants counsel that in pendency of this petition, he has filed the application under Section 320 of Cr.P.C.i.e.I.A.No.15391/12 with the joint signature of the applicants as well as the respondent no.1 to compound the offence as such the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and in such premises, the respondent no.1 does not want to prosecute the applicants in the impugned case and in this regard on filing the compromise application before the trial Court the offence of Sections 406 of I.P.C.being compoundable by allowing such application in part, such offence has been subsided by the tr...
Ghanshyam Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3600/2013 26.3.2013 Shri P.S.Gaharwar, counsel for the applicant. Shri Puneet Shroti, PL, for the State. Heard on IA No.6683/2013, an application for urgent hearing. Considering the averment, the application is allowed. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.67/2012 registered at Police Station Baikunthpur, District Rewa for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of M.P.Excise Act. As per prosecution, it is alleged that 58 bulk liters illicit liquor is said to have been seized from the possession of the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 28.2.2012. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case alongwith grav...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »