Skip to content


Jitendra @ Babla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Jitendra @ Babla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt:


.....in compliance of the aforesaid warrant, he has been arrested and sent to jail. he is ready to cooperate in the investigation. trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer. on due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. the application is allowed. it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court concerned, for his appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c.today. (g.s.solanki) ravi judge

Judgment:


M.Cr.C.No.3174/2013 26.3.2013 Shri Mahendra Choubey, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Puneet Shroti, PL, for the State.

Heard finally.

This is second application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant is in custody since 13/1/2013 in connection with Crime No.263/2008 registered at Police Station Gopalganj, District Sagar for offence punishable under Sections8/20-B(2)(b) of NDPS Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case.

It is further submits that applicant was previously on bail but during trial he remained absent before the trial Court, therefore, learned trial Court has issued an arrest warrant against him.

In compliance of the aforesaid warrant, he has been arrested and sent to jail.

He is ready to cooperate in the investigation.

Trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.

On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant.

The application is allowed.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Committal Court/Trial Court concerned, for his appearance before the said Court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said Court during trial.

C.C.today.

(G.S.Solanki) ravi JUDGE


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //