Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anurudhh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3027/2013 22.3.2013 Shri Ramkirpal Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 30.12.2012 in connection with Crime No.148/2010 registered at P.S.Gourjhamar, District Sagar for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the previously the applicant was released on bail, however, the applicant remained absent before the trial Court, therefore, the trial Court issued warrant of arrest against him and in compliance of the warrant of arrest, he has been sent to the jail. The applicant will regularly appear before the trial Court and will also co-operate in trial. The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. On due consideration of th...
Devendra Prasad @ Devideen Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Cr.A.No.2557 o22. 03.13 Shri Y.M.Tiwari, counsel for the appellant. Shri R.P.Tiwari, GA for the respondent/State. Heard on I.A.No.5796/13, a repeat application for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail to appellant as his earlier application in this regard have been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 22.2.12 with liberty to revive the prayer after six months and it appears that this application is filed under such liberty. This appellant has been convicted under section 307 of the IPC with direction to undergo for RI 7 years with fine of Rs.10000/- , in default of payment of fine further six months RI. Having heard the counsel, keeping in view the arguments advanced, after perusing the record, taking into consideration the nature of the offence including the available medical evidence so also the period suffered by the appellant in jail along with the circumstance that after facing the jail sentence of some days, he remained on bail during trial, without expressing any opi...
Jai Raikwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3075/2013 22.3.2013 Shri Ramkirpal Mishra, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 29.9.2012 in connection with Crime No.86/2008 registered at P.S.Civil Line, District Chhatarpur for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the previously the applicant was released on bail, however, the applicant remained absent before the trial Court, therefore, the trial Court issued warrant of arrest against him and in compliance of the warrant of arrest, he has been sent to the jail. The applicant will regularly appear before the trial Court and will also co-operate in trial. The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. On due considerat...
Madhuk Rao Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Cr.A.No.881/2012 22.3.2013 Shri Manish Tiwari, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rahul Jain, G.A for the State. Heard on I.A.No.6376/2013, a repeat bail application for suspension of sentence. Earlier bail application was withdrawn on 27.12.2012. Applicant Manot has been convicted u/s 304-B and 498-A of I.P.C.and sentence to RI for seven years and fine of Rs.500/- and RI for 2 years and fine of Rs.500/- each vide order dated 29.3.2012 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Betul in S.T.No.235/2010. The allegation against the appellant is that he being the elder brother (Jeth) of husband of the deceased, used to treat the deceased with cruelty both physically and mentally and also demanded dowry. The death of Shubangi, (the deceased) was within 7 years of marriage on 7.5.2010. Learned counsel for the appellant submit that in para 28 of the judgment learned trial judge observed that PW-11 and PW 1.who have investigated the matter came to the conclusion that deceased Shubhangi was residing sepa...
Umesh Kumar Pandey Vs. N.C.L. Singrauli
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
WP No.16926.11 Writ Petition No.16926 of 2011 (Umesh Kumar Pandey and another versus N.C.L.Singrauli and three otheRs.22-03-2013 Shri K.K.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Smt.I.Nair, learned senior counsel with Shri Rajas Pohankar, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 to 3. Heard. Order dated 10-09-2011 is being assailed vide this petition; whereby, claim of the petitioners for employment in lieu of the acquisition of their land has been turned down. The impugned order is passed in pursuant to direction dated 24-02-2011 passed in Writ Petition No.3464/2005(s) whereby the respondents were directed to consider the claim of petitioners for the employment in lieu of acquisition of land. Relevant facts borne out from the record are that in pursuance to notification issued under section 9 of Coal Bearning Area (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 on 23-12-1980 land bearing KhaSr.No.188 was notified for acquisition for Dudhichua Project of Northern Coalfields Limited. On the...
M/S Hakeem Sales Corporation Bhopal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Writ Petition No.4316/2013 22.3.2013 Shri Aditya Sanghi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Government Advocate, for the State/respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar writ petitions have been entertained by this Court and interim order has been granted. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a copy of the order dated 5.9.2012 passed in W.P.No.13385/2012. The aforesaid statement has not been disputed by learned Government Advocate. In W.P.No.13385/2012 this Court on 5.9.2012 passed the following order: The petitioner relies upon an interim order passed by the Supreme Court, which is quoted in an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, copy whereof has been enclosed with this writ petition. The order of the Supreme Court, as quoted in the order of Punjab and Haryana High Court, is as follows: It is pointed out that the levy of Entry tax has been struck down by the Punjab and Haryana High ...
Rajdeep Singh Vs. Pradeep Tripathi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Mcr.C.No.1822 o22. 03.13 Shri K.D.Singh, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tiwari, counsel for the respondents. This case is listed today for appropriate order on not compliance of the court order 13.2.13 by the applicant so also for consideration of IA No.5885/13 respondent's application for vacating ex- parte stay granted earlier. In the available circumstances of the matter, instead to hear the case on the aforesaid objection or not compliance of order dated 13.2.13 as well as the aforesaid IA for vacating the stay or the stay application of the applicant IA No.3267/13, with the consent of the parties, this petition is taken up for final disposal. Counsel present are heard on merits. The applicant/ accused has filed this petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C being aggrieved by the order dated 8.1.13 passed by VI the ASJ.Rewa in Cr.R.No.298/12 (Annex.A-1) affirming the order dated 9.10.12 passed by JMFC, Rewa in Criminal Case No.189/10 whereby the application of the applicant/a...
Vimal Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
Mcr.C.No.418 o22. 03.13 Shri Jitendra Dixit, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.P.Tiwari, GA for the respondents/state. The applicant/ accused has preferred this petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C for quashment of the FIR registered as Crime No.157/12 against him at P.S Bakswaha district Chhatarpur for the offence of section 342,294,323 and 506 of the IPC. In the couRs.of the arguments on admission, in response of some query of the court based on the averments of theFIR as well as the interrogatory statements of the witnesses, the applicant's counsel instead to argue further seeks permission to withdraw this petition as not pressed with liberty to raise all the objection and grounds at appropriate stage of the trial. Considering the aforesaid prayer, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty aforesaid. (U.C.Maheshwari) Judge MKL...
Anwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
1 Cr. Appeal No.1277/11 22.3.2013 Shri Amit Dubey, learned counsel for the appellants. Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned Govt. Adv.for the State. Heard on I.A.No.23699/12, a repeat application on behalf of appellant No.1 Anwar, for suspension of his remaining jail sentence and grant of bail, as his earlier application in this regard was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 13.2.2012, by extending a liberty to revive the prayer at subsequent stage on availability of some additional ground and circumstances in the matter or after serving the substantial part of the jail sentence out of the awarded sentence. It appears that after facing the awarded jail sentence more than two and half yeaRs.the present I.A.has been preferred under the aforesaid liberty. An information letter dated 25.9.2012, obtained by the appellants counsel from the District Jail Khandwa, to show the account of imprisonment suffered by the appellant in jail so also referred the same, is taken on record. The appellant no.1 alo...
Bablu @ Raoshan Kol Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3363/2013 22.3.2013 Shri Jitendra Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 23.2.2013 in connection with Crime No.50/2013 registered at P.S.Bhalumara, District Anooppur for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. The offence is triable by the Magistrate. The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of th...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »