Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vimal Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Vimal Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 22, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045490

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vimal Singh

Advocate Shri. Jitendra Dixit

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

mcr.c.no.418 o”22. 03.13 shri jitendra dixit, counsel for the applicant. shri r.p.tiwari, ga for the respondents/state. the applicant/ accused has preferred this petition under section 482 of the cr.p.c for quashment of the fir registered as crime no.157/12 against him at p.s bakswaha district chhatarpur for the offence of section 342,294,323 and 506 of the ipc. in the cours.of the arguments on admission, in response of some query of the court based on the averments of the fir as well as the interrogatory statements of the witnesses, the applicant's counsel instead to argue further seeks permission to withdraw this petition as not pressed with liberty to raise all the objection and grounds at appropriate stage of the trial. considering the aforesaid prayer, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty aforesaid. (u.c.maheshwari) judge mkl

Full Judgment

Mcr.C.No.418 o”

22. 03.13 Shri Jitendra Dixit, counsel for the applicant.

Shri R.P.Tiwari, GA for the respondents/state.

The applicant/ accused has preferred this petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C for quashment of the FIR registered as Crime No.157/12 against him at P.S Bakswaha district Chhatarpur for the offence of section 342,294,323 and 506 of the IPC.

In the couRs.of the arguments on admission, in response of some query of the court based on the averments of the FIR as well as the interrogatory statements of the witnesses, the applicant's counsel instead to argue further seeks permission to withdraw this petition as not pressed with liberty to raise all the objection and grounds at appropriate stage of the trial.

Considering the aforesaid prayer, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed with liberty aforesaid.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge MKL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial