Madhya Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deenbandhu Higher Secondary School Katheri Rewa Vs. the State of Madhy ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
Writ Petition No :859. / 2013 Deenbandhu Higher Secondary School, Katheri versus State of MP 05.02.2013. Shri Anand Shukla for the petitioner. Keeping in view the directions issued by this Court in W.P.Nos.663/2004, 2659/2004, 2679/2004, 1046/2005, 1200/2005 and 1241/2005, on 22.3.2007, it is directed that on the petitioners filing certified copy of this order alongwith photocopy of the order-dated 22.3.2007 passed by a bench of this Court in the case referred to hereinabove, respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner in view of the reasons indicated in W.P.No.663/2004 and other cases and decide the claim of the petitioners institute afresh in accordance with law and pass a detailed order within a period of two months and communicate the decision to the petitioner. With the aforesaid, this petition stands allowed and disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
C.R. Dhurve Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
WP 24256.03 Writ Petition No.24256 of 2003 (Chhoteram Dhurve v. The State of M.P.and four otheRs.05-02-2013 None for the petitioner. Smt. Sheetal Dubey, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State. Perused the record. This petition has been transferred from M.P.State Administrative Tribunal after its closure. The petitioner while seeking quashment of order dated 04-01-1999 also calls in question the order dated 28-10-1991. By order dated 04-01-1999 an amount of Rs.21,492/- has been directed to be recovered from the petitioner; whereas, by order dated 28-10-1991 the petitioner was subjected to recovery of Rs.21,492/- in 40 instalments from his salary. Cause for recovery has its genesis in the event which took place in 1988-89 when the petitioner, Assistant Teacher, was incharge of Tribal Boys Hostel, Bhaisdehi, was required to handover the charge to Shri K.L.Bhagat-respondent No.4 on 17-11-1988. The petitioner was thereafter promoted as Head- Master and posted in Primary School, Na...
Atul Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
M.Cr.C.No :14891. / 2012 Atul Singh versus State of Madhya Pradesh 05.02.2013. Shri V. Mahavar for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the State. Heard. Case diary perused. Apprehending his arrest in Crime No.615/2011 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Sidhi for offence under section 392 of the IPC, this application has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail. Complainant Surendra Prasad Patel has lodged the FiRs.Information Report.It is stated that one Suraj Singh Baghel had taken him and certain persons came in a motor-cycle and looted the complainant of an amount of `42,000/- and `3,000/- from another co-passenger. It seems that on the basis of statement of Suraj Singh Baghel, co-accused, and the memorandum given by him under section 27 of the Evidence Act, applicant is also found to be involved in the offence and he is likely to be arrested. Apprehending his arrest, this application is filed for grant of anticipatory bail. Even though learned coun...
Kallu Kol Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
1 M.Cr.C.No.9336/2012 5.2.2013 Shri Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer, for the State. Applicant apprehends his arrest in Crime No.56/2011, registered by Police Station Baikunthapur, District Rewa, for having committed offence under Sections 379 and 451 of I.P.C.While considering I.A.No.16228/2012, applicant has been granted Ad-interim anticipatory bail on 31.10.2012. There is no report with regard to misuse of the same by the applicant. Having perused case diary, there is no change in the circumstances and, therefore, the order passed on 31.10.2012 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant is affirmed. Considering the same, this application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest applicant Kallu Kol shall be released on bail on the same terms and conditions as contained in the order dated 31.10.2012. This order shall remain in force for a period of 60 days and in the meanwhile the applicant...
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Tanveer Aslam Ansari
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
Writ Appeal No.859/2008 5.2.2013 Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Government Advocate, for the appellants/State. Shri Saurav Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard on admission. With the consent of learned counsel for parties, the matter is finally heard. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.1.2008 passed in Writ Petition No.1842/2006(S) by the learned Single Judge of this High Court whereby the respondent has been granted compassionate appointment on the ground that he is not disentitled for such employment because his brother is working in the High Court. The relevant clause of the circular dated 1.5.2000 of the General Administration Department is as follows :- Disqualification for compassionate appointment :- 1. If any family member of late government servant is already under the employment of Government service or Corporation, Board, Council, Commission etc.then any other member of his family will not be entitled for compassionate appointment. We find that the...
Niyaz Mohammad Ansari Vs. Smt. Kaneeza Begum
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR Criminal Revision No.1012/2011 Niyaz Mohammad Ansari versus Smt. Kaneeza Begum and another For the applicant : Shri Ahadulla Usmani, Advocate For the Respondents: Shri K.S.Baghel, Advocate ORDER (05.02.2013) U.C.Maheshwari J. The present revision is preferred by the husband of the respondent No.1 while the father of respondent No.2 being aggrieved by the order dated 25.11.2010 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Rewa in Misc. Criminal Case No.210/2008 whereby the application of the respondents herein filed under Section 127 Cr.P.C.was allowed in part and the earlier awarded sum of maintenance has been further enhanced in continuation of the order dated 13.6.2007 passed in Misc.Cr.Case No.97/2006 by the Family Court, Rewa whereby the applicant was directed to pay the maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month to the respondent No.1 while Rs.500/- per month to the respondent No.2 which has been not enhanced from such sum to Rs.1300/- per month and...
Rajesh Pratap Singh @ Raja Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
Rajesh Pratap Singh @ Raja & Others versus State of M.P.M.Cr.C.No.14628 05. 02.2013 : Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Government Advocate for the State. Applicants have been arrested and are in custody since 19.10.2012, in Crime No.881/12, registered by Police Station Kotwali, District Sidhi for having committed offence under Sections 302, 506 & 34 IPC. It is the case of prosecution that the applicants and the deceased Brishraj Singh are related to each other. Brishraj Singh said to have been assaulted by the applicants on 21.9.2012 and it is stated that he expired on 23.9.2012, the allegation against the applicants are that they went to the house of deceased and assaulted him by a 'lathi'. It is the case of the applicants that they have been falsely implicated. Brishraj Singh died because of natural death, he was never hospitalized after the so called incident that took place on 21.9.2012 and the injury suffered by him, as is evident from t...
Vinod Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
M.Cr.C.No.682/2013 (Vinot Kumar & another v. State of M.P.) 05-02-2013 Shri Naveen Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Sudesh Verma, learned G.A.for the State/non-applicant. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The applicants have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail on account of the fact that they have been arrested on 17-11-2012 pursuant to the Crime No.155/2012 registered against them at P.S.Rajendragram, District Anuppur, for offences punishable under Sections 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants that they have been falsely implicated on account of personal enmity with the complainant Ramayan Chandrawanshi. It is submitted that no incriminating evidence has been found against them not has any incriminating document been seized from them. They are being prosecuted only on account of oral statement of the complainant. It is furthe...
Kallo Bai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
Kallo Bai versus State of M.P.MCrC No.619/2013 05.02.2013 Shri Maneesh Soni learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Sudesh Verma, learned Govt. Advocate for the State. The applicant has filed this application under section 439 CrPC, for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.582/2012 registered at Police Station Banda, District Sagar for offences punishable under section 304-B IPC and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that she has been falsely implicated in the case. It is stated that the body of her daughter-in-law, who is separately living with her husband, was found in the well of the village on account of which a case has been registered against her. It is stated that the deceased was married to the applicant's son 5 years back and during this period there has been no complaint against the applicant regarding any demand of dowry or harassment on that count. It is submitted that, however, on the death of her daughter-in-law her mother has filed a false compl...
Manohar Lal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
Writ Petition No :14546. / 2012 Manohar Lal versus State of Madhya Pradesh 05.02.2013. Shri Ramesh Kumar for the applicant. Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the State. Heard. Case diary perused. Applicant has been arrested in Crime No.251/2012 registered at Police Station Ichchawar, District Sehore for offence under sections 376(2)(g).506-B and 342 read with 34 of the IPC. Applicant alongwith co-accused persons, two in number, are alleged to have committed the offence with prosecutrix at about 4.00 in the evening, in a jungle area, by closing her mouth with a cloth and threatening her with a knife. It is stated that the incident is said to have taken place on or about 23.7.2012 as per the narration made by the prosecutrix in the FIR. The FIR is lodged by her after more than a month on 31.8.2012. Emphasizing on the delay of more than 30 days in lodging the FIR and by referring to the fact about the prosecutrix being a divorced woman and her conduct as is made out from her statem...
- ‹ Prev
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- Next ›
- Last »