Atul Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Atul Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 05, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051030

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051030
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Atul Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no :14891. / 2012 atul singh versus state of madhya pradesh 05.02.2013. shri v. mahavar for the petitioner. shri s.s.bisen, government advocate, for the state. heard. case diary perused. apprehending his arrest in crime no.615/2011 registered at police station kotwali, district sidhi for offence under section 392 of the ipc, this application has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail. complainant surendra prasad patel has lodged the firs.information report.it is stated that one suraj singh baghel had taken him and certain persons came in a motor-cycle and looted the complainant of an amount of `42,000/- and `3,000/- from another co-passenger. it seems that on the basis of statement of suraj singh baghel, co-accused, and the memorandum given by him under section 27 of the evidence act, applicant is also found to be involved in the offence and he is likely to be arrested. apprehending his arrest, this application is filed for grant of anticipatory bail. even though learned counsel for the applicant tried to emphasize that on the basis of memorandum of the co-accused the applicant cannot be involved, but considering the nature of allegations made and the material available in the case diary, i see no reason to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. the application is accordingly dismissed. (rajendra menon) aks/- judge

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No :

14891. / 2012 Atul Singh versus State of Madhya Pradesh 05.02.2013.

Shri V.

Mahavar for the petitioner.

Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the State.

Heard.

Case diary perused.

Apprehending his arrest in Crime No.615/2011 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Sidhi for offence under section 392 of the IPC, this application has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail.

Complainant Surendra Prasad Patel has lodged the FiRs.Information Report.It is stated that one Suraj Singh Baghel had taken him and certain persons came in a motor-cycle and looted the complainant of an amount of `42,000/- and `3,000/- from another co-passenger.

It seems that on the basis of statement of Suraj Singh Baghel, co-accused, and the memorandum given by him under section 27 of the Evidence Act, applicant is also found to be involved in the offence and he is likely to be arrested.

Apprehending his arrest, this application is filed for grant of anticipatory bail.

Even though learned counsel for the applicant tried to emphasize that on the basis of memorandum of the co-accused the applicant cannot be involved, but considering the nature of allegations made and the material available in the case diary, I see no reason to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.

The application is accordingly dismissed.

(RAJENDRA MENON) Aks/- JUDGE

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Atul Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education