Madhya Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Bangde Vs. Smt. Jyoti Bangde
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
1 M. Cr.C.NO.11579/2009. 23.1.2013. Shri Vinay Garg, learned counsel for the applicant. None for the respondent. The appearing counsel of the applicant seeks short adjournment on the ground of non-availability of arguing counsel Shri Rakesh Sagar, as he has gone out of station and he fairly submits that he has not come prepared with the matter. In the aforesaid circumstances so also in the absence of the respondents' counsel the case is adjourned. Let it be placed after fifteen days or in any case in the last week of February, 2013. It is noted that in compliance of the order dated 13.8.2012 no documents have been filed the petitioner. However, he is extended a liberty to file the aforesaid documents within ten days, failing which on account of non-compliance of the aforesaid order this petition may be dismissed by the Court. (U.C.Maheshwari) Judge k...
Smt. Kiran Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
Smt. Kiran Shukla versus State of M.P.& Ors Writ Petition No.5939 23. 1.2013: Smt. Sudha Pandit, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State. Petitioner had written a letter to the Hon'ble Chief Justice and it was grievance of the petitioner that her son prisoner No.14/5046 Atul Shukla S/o. Sukhdev Shukla, R/o. 424 Hanumantal, Police Station Hanumantal, District Jabalpur has been punished in Session Trial No.20/86 vide judgment dated 12.5.1995 for an offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC. He has been in custody for more than 20 years and seeking his relief by virtue of the policy of the State Government and contending that many other prisoners who have undergone even smaller sentence and life imprisonment have been released either on Independence Day or on Republic Day and similar treatment is not granted to petitioner's son, a letter was sent seeking premature release of petitioner's son. That apart, it was stated ...
Rizwan Khan Vs. Shameem Akhtar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
M.Cr.C No.9399 o23. 01.13 Shri Ravi Dwivedi, counsel for the applicants. Respondent No.1, subject to admission of the petition, is yet to be noticed. Shri Lalit Joglekar, PL for the respondent No.2. Applicants/party No.2, in the trial court, has filed this petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C for quashment of the order dated 5.5.12 passed by the IIIrd ASJ Raisen in Cr.R.No.26/12 affirming the order dated 18.11.11 passed by SDM Raisen in Criminal case No.05/SDM/09 whereby in the proceedings under section 145 between the applicants and the respondent/ party No.1 it was held that the respondent/ party No.1 is in possession of the disputed house from the time of her husband and the applicants herein had failed to prove their possession over the property by any reliable document. While deciding the matter in such a manner, the SDM has also observed that the respondent/ party No.1 shall not be dispossessed from the possession of the disputed house by the applicants without following the ...
Smt. Mamta Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
Writ Petition No.948/2013 23.01.2013 Mr.Sanjay Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. MRS.Sharada Dubey, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. Heard. In this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the validity of order dated 2.1.2013 by which the earlier order dated 13.7.2012 by which the respondent No.4 was discharged from the post of Hostel Superintendent, Girls Hostel Newton Chikhali has been cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by the order dated 13.7.2012 the respondent No.4 was discharged from the duties of the post of Hostel Superintendent, Girls Hostel Newton Chikhali on the ground that she has completed five years of tenure. Thereafter, the petitioner joined on the post of Hostel Superintendent, Girls Hostel Newton Chikhali on 8.8.2012. However, by the impugned order dated 2.1.2013, the earlier order dated 13.7.2012 has been cancelled and the respondents No.4 has been again posted as Hostel Superintendent of the aforesaid Girls Hostel for ac...
Smt. Sushila Ahirwar Vs. Smt. Arun Rashmi Sami
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
1...Con.C.No.19 o23. 01.2013 Shri Rajesh Dubey, Counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted by the petitioner that he has made the default good by affixing the deficit court fees on Vakalatnama in the Court itself and prays that the matter may be heard. In view of the aforesaid, the matter is heard. Shri Dubey submitted that vide order dated 4.7.2012 in W.A.No.729 of 2012, the Division Bench had directed the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner. It is submitted that after filing of this contempt petition, the representation of the petitioner has been decided so the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to assail the order passed by the respondents. Prayer is allowed. This contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No order as to costs. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) Judge Judge vj 2...Con.C.No.19 o23. 01.2013...
Smt. Anuradha Panthi Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
M.A. 2640/2011 1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA M.A. No.2640/2011 .........Appellants/:1. Smt. Anuradha Panthi, Wd/o Late Shri Claimants Rajkumar Panthi, R/o Ibrahim Ganj, Bhopal, M.P.2. Amit Panthi, Late Shri Rajkumar Panthi, R/o Ibrahim Ganj, Bhopal, M.P.3. Ku. Arti Panthi, D/o Late Shri Rajkumar Panthi, R/o Ibrahim Ganj, Bhopal, M.P. Versus .......Respondent: Union of India through General Manager, West Central Railway, Nearby Indira Market, Jabalpur (M.P.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appellants by - Shri Rajesh Soni, Advocate Respondent by - Shri Vinot Kumar Patel, Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (23/01/2013) The claimants-appellants have assailed the judgment dated 20.4.2011 passed by learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhopal Bench (for short, Tribunal) dismissing the claim application of the ap...
Mrigendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
Writ Petition No.1066/2013 23.1.2013 Shri Rajendra Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, Government Advocate, for the State. Heard on admission. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the election process of Krishak Sewa Sahakari Samiti, Bamhangawan, Tahsil Huzur, District Rewa. Section 64 of the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (in short the Act.) entitles any party to raise a dispute in connection with the election of any officer of the Society or representative of the Society or of Composite Society. This is also apparent from Clause V of sub-section (2) of section 64 of the Act. The petitioner has challenged the election process on various grounds which he can also raise while referring a dispute under section 64 of the Act. In Harneek Singh versus Charanjit Singh (2005) 8 SCC 38.the Supreme Court has held that if a remedy of election petition is available, writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable. I am, therefore, not inclined to adm...
Likkhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
Criminal Revision No.823/2006 23.1.2013 Shri Manish Tiwari, counsel for the applicant. Shri P.C.Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted a certificate from the Superintendent, Circle Jail, Seoni that the entire sentence is executed to the applicant. By perusal of the record of the Court, it appears that vide order dated 17.5.2006, execution of jail sentence of the applicant was suspended. However, he did not appear on the next date given by the Court i.e.on 28.8.2006. The bail papers were also demanded from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balaghat but, a letter dated 1.1.2013 has been received that no such bail papers were received before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balaghat. Under such circumstances, the certificate produced by the applicant appears to be acceptable. Since the entire sentence is executed, the present revision turns infructuous. Consequently, it is hereby dismissed being infructuous. (N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE Pushpendra...
Harsh Shiksha Avam Samaj Kalyan Samiti Vs. National Council for Teache ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
W.P.No.401/2013 23.01.2013 Shri Manot Chansoriya, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri K.K.Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 on advance notice. The petitioner has sought following reliefs(s):-"1. It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of certiorari by quashing impugned letters dated 22-03-2012 and 12-06-2012 contained in Annexure P/3 & P/4 and further they may be directed to take further steps in accordance with NCTE Regulation and Hon'ble Court Orders passed in identical cases, on application of the petitioner samiti for grant of recognition. OR In Alternate- (2) It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 that in case earlier application dated 01-10-2011 is not reconsidered for granting recognition in D.EL.ED. CouRs.then the application fees/inspection fees of Rs.40,000/- be refunded back to the petitioner and they may be also directed to proceed with the second ...
Shri Narmada Prasad Mehar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2013
WP 9913.12 Writ Petition No.9913 of 2012 (Sharda Prasad Mehar v State of M.P.and three otheRs.23-01-2013 Shri Narendra Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri V. Sharma, learned Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. With consent, matter heard finally. Petitioner, retired Patwari, seeks direction to respondents to pay him the salary of the period from 05-07-2005 to 30-12-2005. That, while posted as Patwari, Tehsil Sohagpur, District Hoshangabad, petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 09-07-2005. That a charge sheet was issued on 30-12-2005 and his suspension was revoked. Pending departmental enquiry petitioner retired from service with effect from 31-05-2009. Thereafter, on petitioner's representation regarding settlement of his salary and other dues of the period of suspension, respondent passed an order on 26-04-2012 to the following effect :- J.ueZnk izlkn esgj lsokfuoRr iVokjh }kjk izLrqr tokc dk voyksdu fd;kA iVokjh dh fuyacu vof/k 5-7-2005 ls 31-12-200...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »