Likkhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Likkhan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 23, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049549

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049549
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 23, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Likkhan

Advocate Shri. Manish Tiwari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

criminal revision no.823/2006 23.1.2013 shri manish tiwari, counsel for the applicant. shri p.c.gupta, panel lawyer for the state/ respondent. learned counsel for the applicant has submitted a certificate from the superintendent, circle jail, seoni that the entire sentence is executed to the applicant. by perusal of the record of the court, it appears that vide order dated 17.5.2006, execution of jail sentence of the applicant was suspended. however, he did not appear on the next date given by the court i.e.on 28.8.2006. the bail papers were also demanded from the chief judicial magistrate, balaghat but, a letter dated 1.1.2013 has been received that no such bail papers were received before the chief judicial magistrate, balaghat. under such circumstances, the certificate produced by the applicant appears to be acceptable. since the entire sentence is executed, the present revision turns infructuous. consequently, it is hereby dismissed being infructuous. (n.k.gupta) judge pushpendra

Full Judgment

Criminal Revision No.823/2006 23.1.2013 Shri Manish Tiwari, counsel for the applicant.

Shri P.C.Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted a certificate from the Superintendent, Circle Jail, Seoni that the entire sentence is executed to the applicant.

By perusal of the record of the Court, it appears that vide order dated 17.5.2006, execution of jail sentence of the applicant was suspended.

However, he did not appear on the next date given by the Court i.e.on 28.8.2006.

The bail papers were also demanded from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balaghat but, a letter dated 1.1.2013 has been received that no such bail papers were received before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balaghat.

Under such circumstances, the certificate produced by the applicant appears to be acceptable.

Since the entire sentence is executed, the present revision turns infructuous.

Consequently, it is hereby dismissed being infructuous.

(N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE Pushpendra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Likkhan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education