Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
General Manager Narmada Hydro Electric Development Corporation Vs. Naz ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 F.A.No.614/2012 General Manager (R&R) Nazir Khan & others 13.7.2012 Shri A.J.Pawar, Counsel for appellant. Shri Shashank Upadhyaya, Counsel for respondent No.1. Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy.AG for respondents No.2,3 & 9. I.A.No.7065/12 under Section 149 of CPC for extension of time for payment of deficit court-fee. Alongwith the application, the appellant has paid deficit court-fee. Considering aforesaid, prayer made in the application is allowed. Time period for payment of deficit court-fee is extended till 22.6.2012, the date on which deficit court-fee was paid. Admit. Issue notice to the respondents. Notice on behalf of respondent No.1 is accepted by Shri Upadhyaya and on behalf of respondents No.2, 3 & 9 by Shri Pandey, Dy.AG. I.A.No.6793/12 for stay After hearing both parties, till further ordeRs.following directions are issued:- (i) Appellant to deposit 50% of the awarded amount within a period of one month before the reference Court. (ii) Appellant shall also furnish security for the...
Smt. Johra Bee Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
W.P.No.8492/2012 (Smt. Johra Bee versus State of M.P.& Ors.) 13.07.2012 Heard Shri Ghanshyam Paney, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the police of Police Station Kareli, District Narsinghpur are not properly investigating into the matter and ignoring the documents and complaints filed by the petitioner while registering the case against both the parties. In the circumstances, the petitioner filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5, Superintendent of Police, Narsinghpur to look into the complaint of the petitioner and deal with it in accordance with law. To enable the authority to do so, a copy of the order passed today alongwith a copy of the petition be served upon him by the petitioner. With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C.as per rules. (R.S.Jha) Judge gn...
Rohit Baiga Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.2091/2006 Rohit Baiga & another VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.K.Singh, counsel for the appellants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 21.9.2006 passed by learned Special Judge under Electricity Act, 2003, Sidhi in Special case No.16/2005, whereby the appellants were convicted for offence punishable under section 137 of Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter it will be referred to as 'The Act') and sentenced for one year's rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- against each of them. In default of payment of fine, each of them has to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for ...
Rameshwar Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.1839/1998 Rameshwar VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Y.K.Gupta, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 24.7.1998 passed by learned Special Judge under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Raisen in Special case No.283/1996, whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under section 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter it will be referred to as 'Special Act') and sentenced for 6 months' simple imprisonment with fine of Rs.200/-. In default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for one month was also directed.2. Prosecut...
Amar Singh and ors. Vs. Rajrup and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
F.A.No.206/2005 13.7.2012 Shri Anuj Singh, counsel for appellants. Shri K.S.Baghel, counsel for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 & 5. Shri G.S.Baghel, earlier counsel, who had appeared on behalf of appellants, is also present. I.A.No.7503/2012 for withdrawal of appeal. This application is filed on behalf of appellants by Shri Anuj Singh, Advocate. Shri G.S.Baghel submitted that he has not received any instructions for withdrawal of the appeal, however Shri Anuj Singh, learned counsel for appellants submitted that this application has been filed by the appellants and is also supported by an affidavit of Amar Singh. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 & 5 has no objection if this application is allowed and appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal. In view of aforesaid, this application is allowed. Appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal. This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) JUDGE JUDGE M....
Shyamlal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 Criminal Appeal No.992/2009 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.992/2009 Shyamlal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Brajesh Choubey, counsel for the appellant. Shri G.S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer the respondent/State. Shri Praveen Chourasiya, counsel for the complainant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT (Passed on 13th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 6.5.2009 in Special Case No.13/2007 passed by the Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities), Act Sagar, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(xi) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafte...
Chandramani Prasad and ors. Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K.Gupta,J.CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1101 OF 199.Chandra Mani Prasad & others. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Satish Chaturvedi, Advocate for the appellants No.1 and 3. Shri H.S.Dubey, Advocate for the appellant No.2. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) This criminal appeal is preferred by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment and order of sentence dated 26/5/1997 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rewa in ST No.84/1995, whereby the appellants were convicted for commission of offence punishable under Sections 306 and 498-A of IPC and sentenced for three years' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/- and one year's rigorous imprisonment with fine...
Jeevan Lal Thakur Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
11.07.2012. Petitioners have retired from the establishment of the Education Department. Payment of GPF amount due to the petitioners was withheld on the ground that certain amount from the GPF account of the petitioners was fraudulently withdrawn by some other employee. Petitioners submitted a representation claiming payment of GPF amount, but when the same was not granted, petitioners have filed this petition. It is submitted by the petitioners that due to irregularity committed by another employee in withdrawing the amount from the account of the petitioneRs.they cannot be punished. Orders passed by this Court in the case of other similarly situated employees vide order dated 21.8.2006, in Writ Petition No.9924/2006(S) and 15.12.2008, in Writ Petition No.14032/2008(S) are brought to the notice of this Court. A perusal of these orders indicates that the petitions have been allowed and they have been disposed of with the following directions: (i) Petitioners may submit their individua...
Smt. Sushila Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.4899/2012 Smt. Sushila Tiwari Vs The State of M.P.And otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri D.K.Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents No.1 to 3. Shri Manot Chansoriya, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. ORDER (11.7.2012) 1: This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the order dated 5.3.2012, by which the petitioner, who was working on the post of Auxiliary NuRs.Midwife in Community Health Centre, Naogaon, District Chhatarpur, is sought to be transferred to Sub Primary Health Centre, Koutheha (Gourihar).on the ground that the aforesaid order has been issued treating the petitioner as surplus in the Community Health Centre, Naogaon, whereas, in view of the order passed by the M.P.State Administrative Tribunal, in the Original Application of the petitioner, she is not surplus in the said Community Heal...
Shiv Kumar Kahar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2012
W.P.No.5482/2012 11.7.2012 At the request of Shri Bharat Dubey, T.I.Police Station Cantt., Jabalpur, the case has been called in supplementary list. The T.I.Police Station Cantt., Shri Bharat Dubey and Ms.Santoshi Dubey, Lady Home Guard Constable have produced Ku.Jyoti Kahar in the Court. Father of Jyoti Kahar, petitioner Shiv Kumar Kahar and his wife Smt.Sunita Kahar are also present. On being enquired into, Ku.Jyoti Kahar has handed over a written application addressed to T.I.Cantt., Jabalpur to us, which is taken on record. Ku.Jyoti Kahar has also stated that she is not willing to go along with her parents, as she is apprehending her forcible marriage with some other person. She also insisted that she be permitted to go with Balan Pillai, father of respondent no.4 Umesh Pillai, who is also present in the Court. We have enquired from respondent no.4 Umesh Pillai, who has stated that his age is 20 years and is studying. Balan Pillai, the father of respondent no.4 has stated that he is...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »