Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amar Singh and ors. Vs. Rajrup and ors.

Amar Singh and ors. vs Rajrup and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048951

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amar Singh and ors.

Advocate Shri. Anuj Singh

Respondent

Rajrup and ors.

Advocate Shri. K.S.Baghel

Excerpt

f.a.no.206/2005 13.7.2012 shri anuj singh, counsel for appellants. shri k.s.baghel, counsel for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 & 5. shri g.s.baghel, earlier counsel, who had appeared on behalf of appellants, is also present. i.a.no.7503/2012 for withdrawal of appeal. this application is filed on behalf of appellants by shri anuj singh, advocate. shri g.s.baghel submitted that he has not received any instructions for withdrawal of the appeal, however shri anuj singh, learned counsel for appellants submitted that this application has been filed by the appellants and is also supported by an affidavit of amar singh. learned counsel for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 & 5 has no objection if this application is allowed and appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal. in view of aforesaid, this application is allowed. appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal. this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt.vimla jain) judge judge m.

Full Judgment

F.A.No.206/2005 13.7.2012 Shri Anuj Singh, counsel for appellants.

Shri K.S.Baghel, counsel for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 & 5.

Shri G.S.Baghel, earlier counsel, who had appeared on behalf of appellants, is also present.

I.A.No.7503/2012 for withdrawal of appeal.

This application is filed on behalf of appellants by Shri Anuj Singh, Advocate.

Shri G.S.Baghel submitted that he has not received any instructions for withdrawal of the appeal, however Shri Anuj Singh, learned counsel for appellants submitted that this application has been filed by the appellants and is also supported by an affidavit of Amar Singh.

Learned counsel for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 & 5 has no objection if this application is allowed and appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal.

In view of aforesaid, this application is allowed.

Appellants are permitted to withdraw this appeal.

This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) JUDGE JUDGE M.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial