Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shriniwas Choudhary Vs. Superintendent of Police Jabalpur
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
W.P.No.7126 / 2012 (Shriniwas Choudhary.v.Supdt. of Police, Jabalpur & ors.) 13-07-2012 Heard Shri V.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging inaction on the part of the police authorities by not taking action against the respondent No.4 on the complaint filed by him. It is, however, prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition be disposed of directing the respondent/Supdt. of Police, to take appropriate action in accordance with law against the respondent No.4. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1, Superintendent of Police, Jabalpur to look into the complaint filed by the petitioner and deal with the same expeditiously in accordance with law. To enable the concerned authority to do so, a copy of the order passed by this Court today along with a copy of the petition be furnished by the ...
Lalu @ Rajesh Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2607/1997 Lalu alias Rajesh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ......................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri Ishteyaq Hussain, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer. ......................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 24.1.1997, passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa in ST. No.68/1997 whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 326 of I.P.C and sentenced for 3 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, he was to undergo, additional rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. The prosecution's story in short ...
Jay Karan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.680/2010 Jai Karan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri L. N. Sakle, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri G. S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer. ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 31.3.2010, passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara in ST. No.99/2009 whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 307of I.P.C and sentenced for 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, he was to undergo, additional rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. The prosecution's story in short is t...
Meena Kumar Vs. Municipal Corporation
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
W.P.No.8109/2007 (Smt. Meena Kumari and another versus Municipal Corporation Bhopal and another) 13.07.2012 Shri S.S.Thakur, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri Gaurav Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard. The petitioners have filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 27.06.2007 passed by the Town Inspector, Municipal Corporation, Bhopal directing the petitioners to vacate the premises within 24 hours under section 301 of the M.P.Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents opposes the petition on the ground that the petitioners have an alternative remedy against the impugned order under the provisions of the Act. It is however, observed that the petition is of the year 2007 and by order dated 02.07.2007 this court had stayed the operation of the impugned order Annexure P/4 dated 27.06.2007 till the next date of hearing on account of which the respondents have not taken any action against the petitioners till date. As the pe...
Devsharan Tripathi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2319/2011 Devsharan Tripathi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri Deepak Pendharkar, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer. ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on this 13th of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 30.9.2011, passed by Special Judge, NDPS Act, Satna in Special Case No.7/2009 whereby he was convicted for offence punishable under Section 8 read with Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act, 1985 and sentenced for four years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/-. It was further directed that he shall undergo for two months additional rigorous imprisonment in default of...
Sunil Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
W.P.No.7194/2008 (Sunil Kumar versus State of MP and otheRs.13.07.2012 Heard Shri K.K.Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 31.10.2007 passed by the Collector, Dindouri staying the notification issued in favour of the petitioner declaring him to be Secretary of Gram Panchayat Banki. Admittedly, the remedy of the petitioner against the aforesaid impugned order lies before the Commissioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to assail the impugned order before the competent authority. In view of the aforesaid request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Balak Ram Singh Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.1482/2011(S) Balak Ram Singh versus State Bank of India and another. PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi.J.Shri Akash Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Ashish Shroti, learned counsel for respondents. ORDER (13.7.2012) This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed calling in question the communication dated 28.12.2010 (Annx.P/1) by which the petitioner is informed that his application for voluntary retirement from Bank services cannot be considered as a disciplianry action is contemplated against the petitioner, on the ground that no such refusal to accept the application for voluntary retirement could have been communicated to the petitioner not such a decision could be taken by the respondents as the date for voluntary retirement was specifically mentioned by the petitioner in his application and the said communication was received by the petitioner after the expiry of ...
The State of M.P. Vs. Randheer Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR SB: HON. SHRI JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1003 OF 199.State of Madhya Pradesh. Vs. Randheer Singh & others. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the appellant/State. Shri Aseem Dixit, Advocate for the respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) The State has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 30.6.1997 passed in ST No.328/1996 by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar by which the respondents were acquitted from the charges of offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 324/149 of IPC.2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 20.7.1996 at about 6:00 PM complainant Harprasad (PW-6) was taking his bullocks from his field to his house situated in the village Orja. When he reached in front of the house of respondent ...
Pramod Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2049/2011 Pramod Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri B.K. Bais Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer. ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 23.8.2011, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Singrauli in ST. No.226/2010 whereby appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 of I.P.C and Section 342 of I.P.C and sentenced for 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/- and three months rigorous imprisonment. In default of payment of fine, he was to undergo additiona...
Rajjab Ali Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.1058/2012 Rajjab Ali VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Narendra Nikhare, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 13th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 30.4.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdol in S.T.No.260/2004, whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced as under:- CONVICTION SENTENCE DEFAULT SENTENCE 14 of IPC 1 year Rigorous - Imprisonment. 324/149 1 year Rigorous - Imprisonment. 332/149 2 years Rigorous - Imprisonment2. years Rigorous - Imprisonment7. years Rigorous 15 days additional Imprisonment Rigorous imprisonment with fine of in default of payment of Rs.100/-. fi...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »