Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madan Maharaj College Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 18352/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
itishree Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
31.7.2012 Shri Nikhil Tiwari, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Crime No.72/2012 registered at P.S.Nasrullaganj, District Sehore for the offence punishable under Sections 409, 420 of the IPC and 6 of the Madhya Pradesh Nikshepakon Ke Hiton Ka Sanrakshan Adhiniyam, 2000. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. As per prosecution itself, the allegations are made against Shivraj Sharma and Harish Sharma. Since the applicant was one of the Directors at the time of formation of Board, therefore, she is apprehending her arrest. She is a permanent resident of H.B.Pratapnagar, Jaipur, therefore, there is no possibility of her absconding. The applicant is a lady and is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest, h...
Sujeet Singh @ Mintu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
M.Cr.C.No.7471/2012 31/07/2012 Shri Rahul Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Prkash Gupta, P.P.for the respondent/State. Heard finally. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by applicant under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.109/12, registered at P.S.Vishwavidyalaya, District Rewa for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 294, 323, 327, 506, 325, 326 read with section 34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that initially a case under sections 341, 294, 323, 327, 506, 325 read with section 34 of IPC was registered against him thereafter, on the basis of x-ray report of injured/complainant, section 326 of IPC is added. It is submitted that during the period of bail, he did not misuse the liberty granted to him. Applicant is a Govt. Servant. In the event of arrest his reputation a...
Sonelal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
31.7.2012 Shri G.S.Thakur, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA for the State. Admit. Call for the case diary. Heard on I.A.No.14886/2012, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicants. The applicants apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.251/2012 registered at P.S.Hatta, District Damoh for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A/34 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. Applicant No.1 is father-in-law, applicant No.2 is mother-in-law and applicant No.3 is married sister-in-law of complainants Kamini and Bhanu. Applicant No.3 is residing separately, she has delivered a child recently. The applicants are reputed citizens of the locality, in the event of arrest their reputation will be tarnished, therefore, they be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for State has opposed the application. Considering the overall facts and circum...
indore Mahavidyalaya Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 17584/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Saviour College, Run by Kunjan Shiksha Samiti Bhopal Vs. Western Regio ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 594/2011 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges w...
Nagraj Patil Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
31.7.2012 Shri Abhilash Dey, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 18.4.2012 in connection with Crime No.71/2012 registered at P.S.Ratibarh, District Bhopal for the offence punishable under sections 363, 366, 376 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. As per prosecution itself, Prosecutrix Shivani is aged about more than 17 yeaRs.she had gone with the applicant on her own accord, they travelled many places and ultimately performed marriage in a Somnath Temple, thereafter, after coming back to her parental house, she lodged false and concocted report against the applicant. The charge sheet has already been filed. The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. Learned counsel...
Chouhan Education Society Vs. Barkatullah University
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 16037/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Khilan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
CR.R.No.1364.12 31.07.2012 Shri Shashank Upadhyay, Advocate, for applicant. Shri Pushpraj Singh, Panel Lawyer, for respondent/State. Records of the courts below were called on 25.7.2012 but not received. Heard on I.A.No.15090/12 an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to applicants . Applicant has been convicted u/s279 and 338 of IPC and sentenced to R.I.for six months and fined of Rs.1,000/ -vide judgment and finding dated 14.9.2011 in Criminal Case no.156/06 by J.M.F.C Tikamgarh; in Cri. appeal No.425/11 vide judgment dated 13.7.12 of Sessions Judge Tikamgarh has dismissed the appeal by maintaining sentence. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that fine amount has been deposited by applicant. Applicant is in jail. He filed copies of judgment of both the courts below and evidence of prosecution. Looking to the nature of punishment and the nature of the case and the fact that this revision is not likely to be heard and disposed of at an early date I.A.not is a...
Vardhman P.G. College Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 15735/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »