Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Khilan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Khilan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 31, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047730

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Khilan

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

cr.r.no.1364.12 31.07.2012 shri shashank upadhyay, advocate, for applicant. shri pushpraj singh, panel lawyer, for respondent/state. records of the courts below were called on 25.7.2012 but not received. heard on i.a.no.15090/12 an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to applicants . applicant has been convicted u/s279 and 338 of ipc and sentenced to r.i.for six months and fined of rs.1,000/ -vide judgment and finding dated 14.9.2011 in criminal case no.156/06 by j.m.f.c tikamgarh; in cri. appeal no.425/11 vide judgment dated 13.7.12 of sessions judge tikamgarh has dismissed the appeal by maintaining sentence. learned counsel for the applicant submits that fine amount has been deposited by applicant. applicant is in jail. he filed copies of judgment of both the courts below and evidence of prosecution. looking to the nature of punishment and the nature of the case and the fact that this revision is not likely to be heard and disposed of at an early date i.a.not is allowed. it is directed that if the accused/applicant khilan pays the fine and furnishes personal bond to the tune of rs.25,000/- (rs.twenty five thousand only) each with a surety bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for his appearance before this court on 18.12.2012 and continue thereafter as may be directed, he be released on bail and the substantive jail sentence shall remain suspended during pendency of this revision. records of the courts below were called by sending a reminder. certified copy today. (m.a.siddiqui) judge ag/

Full Judgment

CR.R.No.1364.12 31.07.2012 Shri Shashank Upadhyay, Advocate, for applicant.

Shri Pushpraj Singh, Panel Lawyer, for respondent/State.

Records of the courts below were called on 25.7.2012 but not received.

Heard on I.A.No.15090/12 an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to applicants .

Applicant has been convicted u/s279 and 338 of IPC and sentenced to R.I.for six months and fined of Rs.1,000/ -vide judgment and finding dated 14.9.2011 in Criminal Case no.156/06 by J.M.F.C Tikamgarh; in Cri.

appeal No.425/11 vide judgment dated 13.7.12 of Sessions Judge Tikamgarh has dismissed the appeal by maintaining sentence.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that fine amount has been deposited by applicant.

Applicant is in jail.

He filed copies of judgment of both the courts below and evidence of prosecution.

Looking to the nature of punishment and the nature of the case and the fact that this revision is not likely to be heard and disposed of at an early date I.A.not is allowed.

It is directed that if the accused/applicant Khilan pays the fine and furnishes personal bond to the tune of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty five thousand only) each with a surety bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before this Court on 18.12.2012 and continue thereafter as may be directed, he be released on bail and the substantive jail sentence shall remain suspended during pendency of this revision.

Records of the courts below were called by sending a reminder.

Certified copy today.

(M.A.SIDDIQUI) JUDGE Ag/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial