Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naran Saini Vs. Life Insurance Coporation of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 Naran Saini versus Life Insurance Co.W.P.No.4368/2012 31/7/2012: Shri P.N.Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.S.Ruprah, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A.No.5176/2012 an application for vacating stay. Petitioner is only transferred from one office to another in the same town of Bhopal. Distance between two offices are only 6 kMs.Petitioner has sought stay into the matter mainly on the ground that he is a RTI activist and because of certain queries made by the petitioner, a charge sheet is issued to the petitioner, enquiry into the charge sheet is stayed by this Court and therefore, the transfer is on malafide consideration. Shri N.S.Ruprah, learned counsel for the respondents Corporation has refuted the aforesaid and submits that only a vague allegation of malafide are made which are not supported by any cogent material. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record it is seen that in the writ petition filed by the petitioner ...
H.L.Agrawal College of Education Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 4567/2012 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Smt. Nisha Malhotra @ Smita Ghosh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
31.7.2012 Shri Ghanshyam Pandey, Advocate for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, PL for the State. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant is in custody since 31.5.2012 in connection with Crime No.461/2012 registered at P.S.Kotwali, District Shahdol for the offence punishable under sections 182, 193, 194, 211, 120B of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a lady, she has been falsely implicated in the case. As per prosecution, it is alleged against the applicant that previously she lodged a report against Arjit Walia and Durgadas, which was found false and fabricated during the investigation, therefore, the police registered the aforesaid offence against the applicant and taken her in custody. Co.accused Smt. Barkha Khatri has been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 27.6.2012 passed in M.Cr.C.No.6735/2012. The applicant is in custody and trial would take con...
M/S Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizer Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Prades ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
....1 W.A.No.652 o31. 7.2012 Shri Kishore Shrivastava, learned Senior Advocate with Shri Shashank Verma, Counsel for the appellant. Shri P.K.Kaurav, learned Dy. A.G.for the respondents. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that today he has filed an affidavit of Anil Kumar Bhalla in compliance of order dated 24.7.2012. Shri Kaurav prays for further two weeks time to file affidavit of the concerned Secretary in compliance of order dated 24.7.2012. On the aforesaid prayer, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent No.1 at the time of filing of the affidavit may also look into the provisions as contained under Sub Section 11 of Section 32 of the M.P.Commercial Act, 1994, which provides relaxation in the payment of interest and penalty and may submit a specific affidavit in this regard because in the matter of appellant installments were allowed by the respondents which the appellant had deposited much before the last date of payment of installments. The aforesai...
Pandit Bamhorilal Gayatri Devi Memorial College Vs. the State of Madhy ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 16206/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
indira Gandhi B. Ed. Mahavidyalaya Vs. Western Regional Committee of N ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 595/2011 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges w...
ChaIn Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 M. Cr.C.No.9073/12. 31.7.2012. Smt. Pratibha Mishra , learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Akhilesh Shukla, learned Dy.G.A. for the respondent. This petition is preferred on behalf of the applicant for appropriate direction to the Legal Services Committee of this Court to pay the scheduled fees to the appearing counsel of the applicant namely Smt. Pratibha Mishra, as she was appointed at the expenses of the aforesaid Legal Services Committee of this Court to prosecute Cr.R.No.1344/2000 decided by this Court on 8.5.2012. In the couRs.of the argument on admission in the light of order sheet dated 8.5.2012 passed in the aforesaid Cr.R.No.1344/2000, contending the appointment of such applicant's counsel at the expenses of the aforesaid Legal Service Committee of this Court, on making certain query from the applicant's counsel, on which he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the office of such Legal Services Committee to get her fees on the basis of orde...
Jawaharlal Nehru College Vs. Barkatullah University
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 14932/2010 31.7.2012 Shri Siddharth Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Satish Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned counsel for respondent State. Shri K.K. Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. Order passed in this case shall also govern the disposal of Writ Petition Nos. 15118/2010, 15214/2010, 15298/2010, 15307/2010, 16037/2010, 17086/2010, 17088/2010, 17583/2010, 17584/2010, 4552/2012, 4558/2012, 4561/2012, 4562/2012, 4567/2012, 4569/2012, 4570/2012, 16206/2010, 15735/2010, 18352/2010, 18353/2010, 18354/2010, 18355/2010, 18357/2010, 1047/2010, 16046/2010, 591/2011, 594/2011 and 595/2011. Common issue is being raised in all these petitions as to whether the students admitted in petitioner Colleges in the academic session 200809 for B. Ed courses would be entitled to take up the examinations as the same has been declined for the reason that the students ha...
indira Priyadarshni College Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 18353/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Shiv Gopal Vishwakarma Vs. Devendra Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI Misc. Appeal No.68 of 2008 Shiv Gopal Vishwakarma versus Devendra Kumar & others For Appellant : Shri Ranjeet Singh, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Rajkumar Verma, Advocate no.3 O R D E R 31.07.2012 Assailing the award dated 10.10.2007, passed by the learned Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raisen, in Claim Case No.17/2007 on the point of inadequacy of the compensation, the injured appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for an accident took place on 15.05.2006 in which he sustained severe injuries.2. The appellant had filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation to the tune of Rs.5,75,000/ for the injuries sustained by him. The reply to the claim petition was filed and after recording the evidence, the Tr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »