Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

ChaIn Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

ChaIn Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 31, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047780

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ChaIn Singh

Advocate Smt. Pratibha Mishra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 m. cr.c.no.9073/12. 31.7.2012. smt. pratibha mishra , learned counsel for the applicant. shri akhilesh shukla, learned dy.g.a. for the respondent. this petition is preferred on behalf of the applicant for appropriate direction to the legal services committee of this court to pay the scheduled fees to the appearing counsel of the applicant namely smt. pratibha mishra, as she was appointed at the expenses of the aforesaid legal services committee of this court to prosecute cr.r.no.1344/2000 decided by this court on 8.5.2012. in the cours.of the argument on admission in the light of order sheet dated 8.5.2012 passed in the aforesaid cr.r.no.1344/2000, contending the appointment of such applicant's counsel at the expenses of the aforesaid legal service committee of this court, on making certain query from the applicant's counsel, on which he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the office of such legal services committee to get her fees on the basis of order dated 8.5.2012. considering her prayer petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the aforesaid legal services committee of this court to get her remuneration on the basis of order sheet dated 8.5.2012. let the copy of this order as well the order sheet of dated 8.5.2012 drawn in cr.r.no.1344/00 be given to the appearing counsel of the appellant on usual charges within two days. (u.c.maheshwari) judge k

Full Judgment

1 M.

Cr.C.No.9073/12.

31.7.2012.

Smt.

Pratibha Mishra , learned counsel for the applicant.

Shri Akhilesh Shukla, learned Dy.G.A.

for the respondent.

This petition is preferred on behalf of the applicant for appropriate direction to the Legal Services Committee of this Court to pay the scheduled fees to the appearing counsel of the applicant namely Smt.

Pratibha Mishra, as she was appointed at the expenses of the aforesaid Legal Services Committee of this Court to prosecute Cr.R.No.1344/2000 decided by this Court on 8.5.2012.

In the couRs.of the argument on admission in the light of order sheet dated 8.5.2012 passed in the aforesaid Cr.R.No.1344/2000, contending the appointment of such applicant's counsel at the expenses of the aforesaid Legal Service Committee of this Court, on making certain query from the applicant's counsel, on which he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the office of such Legal Services Committee to get her fees on the basis of order dated 8.5.2012.

Considering her prayer petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the aforesaid Legal Services Committee of this Court to get her remuneration on the basis of order sheet dated 8.5.2012.

Let the copy of this order as well the order sheet of dated 8.5.2012 drawn in Cr.R.No.1344/00 be given to the appearing counsel of the appellant on usual charges within two days.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge k

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial