Jeevanlal Vs. Puranlal

Jeevanlal vs Puranlal

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 29, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1051839

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1051839
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 29, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jeevanlal

Advocate Shri. Umesh Trivedi

Respondent

Puranlal

Excerpt

w.p.no.8713/2012 (jeevanlal versus puranlal & ors.) 29.06.2012 heard shri umesh trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. the learned counsel for the petitioner having assailed the validity of order dated 04.05.12 passed by the firs.additional district judge, balaghat in misc. appeal no.17/12 and having argued at length, submits that he will implead the janpad panchayat as party and has prayed for an observation to the effect that on his doing the same and filing a fresh application for injunction, the court below be directed to take a decision on the application at an early date. in view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with an observation that in case the petitioner files a fresh application for injunction in the pending suit after impleading the janpad panchayat, lanji, district balaghat, the court below shall take up the matter at an early date and after hearing all concerned shall decide the application as early as possible in accordance with law. with the aforesaid observations, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge gn w.p.no.8713/2012 (jeevanlal versus puranlal & ors.)

Full Judgment

W.P.No.8713/2012 (Jeevanlal versus Puranlal & ors.) 29.06.2012 Heard Shri Umesh Trivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

The learned counsel for the petitioner having assailed the validity of order dated 04.05.12 passed by the FiRs.Additional District Judge, Balaghat in Misc.

Appeal No.17/12 and having argued at length, submits that he will implead the Janpad Panchayat as party and has prayed for an observation to the effect that on his doing the same and filing a fresh application for injunction, the court below be directed to take a decision on the application at an early date.

In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with an observation that in case the petitioner files a fresh application for injunction in the pending suit after impleading the Janpad Panchayat, Lanji, District Balaghat, the court below shall take up the matter at an early date and after hearing all concerned shall decide the application as early as possible in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid observations, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge gn W.P.No.8713/2012 (Jeevanlal versus Puranlal & ors.)

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Jeevanlal vs Puranlal Same Subject Education